Caregiver reactions to babbling organize turn-taking interactions: Facilitative effects of vocal versus non-vocal responses

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Vivian Hanwen Zhang, Steven L. Elmlinger, Rachel R. Albert, Michael H. Goldstein
{"title":"Caregiver reactions to babbling organize turn-taking interactions: Facilitative effects of vocal versus non-vocal responses","authors":"Vivian Hanwen Zhang,&nbsp;Steven L. Elmlinger,&nbsp;Rachel R. Albert,&nbsp;Michael H. Goldstein","doi":"10.1111/infa.12596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Turn-taking interactions are foundational to the development of social, communicative, and cognitive skills. In infants, vocal turn-taking experience is predictive of infants' socioemotional and language development. However, different forms of turn-taking interactions may have different effects on infant vocalizing. It is presently unknown how caregiver vocal, non-vocal and multimodal responses to infant vocalizations compare in extending caregiver-infant vocal turn-taking bouts. In bouts that begin with an infant vocalization, responses that maintain versus change the communicative modality may differentially affect the likelihood of further infant vocalizing. No studies have examined how caregiver response modalities that either matched or differed from the infant acoustic (vocal) modality might affect the temporal structure of vocal turn-taking beyond the initial serve-and-return exchanges. We video-recorded free-play sessions of 51 caregivers with their 9-month-old infants. Caregivers responded to babbling most often with vocalizations. In turn, caregiver vocal responses were significantly more likely to elicit subsequent infant babbling. Bouts following an initial caregiver vocal response contained significantly more turns than those following a non-vocal or multimodal response. Thus prelinguistic turn-taking is sensitive to the modality of caregivers' responses. Future research should investigate if such sensitivity is grounded in attentional constraints, which may influence the structure of turn-taking interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turn-taking interactions are foundational to the development of social, communicative, and cognitive skills. In infants, vocal turn-taking experience is predictive of infants' socioemotional and language development. However, different forms of turn-taking interactions may have different effects on infant vocalizing. It is presently unknown how caregiver vocal, non-vocal and multimodal responses to infant vocalizations compare in extending caregiver-infant vocal turn-taking bouts. In bouts that begin with an infant vocalization, responses that maintain versus change the communicative modality may differentially affect the likelihood of further infant vocalizing. No studies have examined how caregiver response modalities that either matched or differed from the infant acoustic (vocal) modality might affect the temporal structure of vocal turn-taking beyond the initial serve-and-return exchanges. We video-recorded free-play sessions of 51 caregivers with their 9-month-old infants. Caregivers responded to babbling most often with vocalizations. In turn, caregiver vocal responses were significantly more likely to elicit subsequent infant babbling. Bouts following an initial caregiver vocal response contained significantly more turns than those following a non-vocal or multimodal response. Thus prelinguistic turn-taking is sensitive to the modality of caregivers' responses. Future research should investigate if such sensitivity is grounded in attentional constraints, which may influence the structure of turn-taking interactions.

照料者对咿呀学语组织轮流互动的反应:发声与不发声反应的促进作用
轮流互动是社交、沟通和认知技能发展的基础。对于婴儿来说,轮流发声的经验可以预测婴儿的社会情感和语言发展。然而,不同形式的轮流互动可能会对婴儿发声产生不同的影响。目前我们还不清楚,在护理人-婴儿轮流发声的过程中,护理人对婴儿发声的发声、非发声和多模式反应是如何比较的。在以婴儿发声开始的回合中,保持或改变交流模式的反应可能会对婴儿进一步发声的可能性产生不同的影响。目前还没有研究表明,与婴儿声音(发声)模式相匹配或不同的照料者反应模式会如何影响发声回合的时间结构,而不仅仅是最初的发球和回球交流。我们对 51 名照顾者与 9 个月大婴儿的自由游戏过程进行了录像。婴儿咿呀学语时,照顾者最常以发声作为回应。反过来,照顾者的发声反应也更有可能引起婴儿随后的咿呀学语。与非发声或多模态反应相比,护理人员最初发声反应后的回合数明显更多。因此,前语言轮流对照料者的反应方式很敏感。未来的研究应探讨这种敏感性是否基于注意力限制,而注意力限制可能会影响轮流互动的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信