Analyst information about peer firms during the IPO quiet period

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Badryah Alhusaini, Andrew C. Call, Kimball Chapman
{"title":"Analyst information about peer firms during the IPO quiet period","authors":"Badryah Alhusaini, Andrew C. Call, Kimball Chapman","doi":"10.1007/s11142-024-09824-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The SEC limits sell-side analysts’ research activities on IPO firms both before and immediately after going public (the IPO quiet period). However, during the IPO quiet period, analysts provide regular coverage of IPO peer firms, which is potentially relevant to investors seeking to glean information about the IPO firm itself. We examine whether, despite the restrictions on analyst research of IPO firms during the quiet period, investors uncover information about the IPO firm indirectly through analyst research of peer firms. We find that, on the IPO date, institutional investors trade on the information in analysts’ recommendation revisions of peer firms that were issued earlier in the quiet period. Institutional investors also trade in the short window around analyst revisions of peer firms that are issued later in the quiet period (after the IPO date) but before analysts initiate coverage of the IPO firm. Retail investors, however, are inattentive to the information available in analyst research of peer firms. Importantly, our findings vary predictably with attributes of the issuing analyst, which helps rule out firm- and industry-level alternative explanations. Lastly, we find that recommendation revisions analysts issue for peer firms predict future IPO-firm performance, suggesting that analyst research of peer firms during the quiet period conveys meaningful information about the IPO firm that results in an information advantage for institutional investors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48120,"journal":{"name":"Review of Accounting Studies","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09824-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SEC limits sell-side analysts’ research activities on IPO firms both before and immediately after going public (the IPO quiet period). However, during the IPO quiet period, analysts provide regular coverage of IPO peer firms, which is potentially relevant to investors seeking to glean information about the IPO firm itself. We examine whether, despite the restrictions on analyst research of IPO firms during the quiet period, investors uncover information about the IPO firm indirectly through analyst research of peer firms. We find that, on the IPO date, institutional investors trade on the information in analysts’ recommendation revisions of peer firms that were issued earlier in the quiet period. Institutional investors also trade in the short window around analyst revisions of peer firms that are issued later in the quiet period (after the IPO date) but before analysts initiate coverage of the IPO firm. Retail investors, however, are inattentive to the information available in analyst research of peer firms. Importantly, our findings vary predictably with attributes of the issuing analyst, which helps rule out firm- and industry-level alternative explanations. Lastly, we find that recommendation revisions analysts issue for peer firms predict future IPO-firm performance, suggesting that analyst research of peer firms during the quiet period conveys meaningful information about the IPO firm that results in an information advantage for institutional investors.

Abstract Image

首次公开募股静默期同行公司的分析师信息
美国证券交易委员会限制卖方分析师在首次公开募股公司上市前和上市后(首次公开募股静默期)对其进行研究活动。然而,在 IPO 静默期,分析师会对 IPO 同行公司进行定期报道,这对投资者收集 IPO 公司本身的信息具有潜在意义。我们研究了尽管在静默期分析师对 IPO 公司的研究受到限制,投资者是否仍能通过分析师对同行公司的研究间接发现 IPO 公司的信息。我们发现,在 IPO 当日,机构投资者会根据分析师对同行公司在静默期早些时候发布的建议修订中的信息进行交易。机构投资者还在静默期后期(IPO 日之后)但在分析师开始报道 IPO 公司之前发布的同行公司分析师建议修订前后的短暂窗口中进行交易。然而,散户投资者并不关注分析师对同行公司的研究信息。重要的是,我们的研究结果随发行分析师属性的变化而变化,这有助于排除公司和行业层面的其他解释。最后,我们发现分析师为同行公司发布的建议修订预测了未来 IPO 公司的表现,这表明在静默期分析师对同行公司的研究传递了有关 IPO 公司的有意义的信息,从而为机构投资者带来了信息优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Accounting Studies
Review of Accounting Studies BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Review of Accounting Studies provides an outlet for significant academic research in accounting including theoretical, empirical, and experimental work. The journal is committed to the principle that distinctive scholarship is rigorous. While the editors encourage all forms of research, it must contribute to the discipline of accounting. The Review of Accounting Studies is committed to prompt turnaround on the manuscripts it receives.  For the majority of manuscripts the journal will make an accept-reject decision on the first round.  Authors will be provided the opportunity to revise accepted manuscripts in response to reviewer and editor comments; however, discretion over such manuscripts resides principally with the authors.  An editorial revise and resubmit decision is reserved for new submissions which are not acceptable in their current version, but for which the editor sees a clear path of changes which would make the manuscript publishable. Officially cited as: Rev Account Stud
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信