Semi-automated system for capturing and removing invasive carp during seasonal migrations

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Przemyslaw G. Bajer, M. Vincent Hirt, Cameron P. Swanson, Emil Kukulski, Matthew Kocian
{"title":"Semi-automated system for capturing and removing invasive carp during seasonal migrations","authors":"Przemyslaw G. Bajer, M. Vincent Hirt, Cameron P. Swanson, Emil Kukulski, Matthew Kocian","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03308-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many invasive fish conduct seasonal migrations, which create opportunities for large-scale removal. However, labor costs, cumbersome logistics, and environmental conditions (water depth, current, etc.) often make such efforts not feasible. We tested a semi-autonomous system for removing invasive common carp during spawning migrations in a natural stream (20 m wide, 1.5 m deep) over two migration seasons. A low-voltage, vertical deterrence and guidance system (DGS) was used to block the migrating carp and direct them into a large enclosure near shore. Additional electrodes placed in the enclosure created a sweeping electric field to push the carp towards one end and aggregate them over partially submerged conveyors that removed the carp from the water. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and antennas were used to monitor carp behavior and removal efficacy. Each year, spawning migration lasted approximately two months and removal efforts occurred on 19 (year 1) and 21 (year 2) days. The DGS blocked over 90% of the carp and directed them into our trap. In year 1, 56% of the migrating carp were removed, and 68% were removed in year 2 (23,500 carp removed overall). In the final iteration of the system, a crew of three was able to conduct the removal, primarily by operating control systems on shore. Similar systems could be used for other invasive fish in larger and deeper environments where direct human labor is problematic. Such systems could also be used for native species to help them navigate passageways or to deflect them from entrainment areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03308-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many invasive fish conduct seasonal migrations, which create opportunities for large-scale removal. However, labor costs, cumbersome logistics, and environmental conditions (water depth, current, etc.) often make such efforts not feasible. We tested a semi-autonomous system for removing invasive common carp during spawning migrations in a natural stream (20 m wide, 1.5 m deep) over two migration seasons. A low-voltage, vertical deterrence and guidance system (DGS) was used to block the migrating carp and direct them into a large enclosure near shore. Additional electrodes placed in the enclosure created a sweeping electric field to push the carp towards one end and aggregate them over partially submerged conveyors that removed the carp from the water. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and antennas were used to monitor carp behavior and removal efficacy. Each year, spawning migration lasted approximately two months and removal efforts occurred on 19 (year 1) and 21 (year 2) days. The DGS blocked over 90% of the carp and directed them into our trap. In year 1, 56% of the migrating carp were removed, and 68% were removed in year 2 (23,500 carp removed overall). In the final iteration of the system, a crew of three was able to conduct the removal, primarily by operating control systems on shore. Similar systems could be used for other invasive fish in larger and deeper environments where direct human labor is problematic. Such systems could also be used for native species to help them navigate passageways or to deflect them from entrainment areas.

Abstract Image

在季节性迁徙期间捕捉和清除入侵鲤鱼的半自动化系统
许多入侵鱼类会进行季节性洄游,这为大规模清除创造了机会。然而,劳动力成本、繁琐的后勤工作以及环境条件(水深、水流等)往往使这种工作不可行。我们测试了一种半自动系统,用于在自然溪流(宽 20 米,深 1.5 米)的两个洄游季节清除产卵期洄游的外来鲤鱼。该系统采用低电压、垂直威慑和引导系统(DGS)来阻挡洄游的鲤鱼,并将其引导至靠近海岸的大型围栏内。放置在围栏中的其他电极产生一个横扫电场,将鲤鱼推向一端,并将它们聚集在部分浸没的传送带上,传送带将鲤鱼从水中移走。被动集成转发器(PIT)标签和天线用于监测鲤鱼的行为和移除效果。每年的产卵洄游大约持续两个月,清除工作分别在 19 天(第一年)和 21 天(第二年)进行。DGS 拦截了 90% 以上的鲤鱼,并引导它们进入我们的诱捕器。第 1 年,56% 的洄游鲤鱼被清除,第 2 年,68% 的洄游鲤鱼被清除(共清除 23500 条鲤鱼)。在该系统的最后一次迭代中,一个三人小组主要通过在岸上操作控制系统来完成清除工作。类似的系统也可用于其他入侵鱼类,在更大和更深的环境中,直接使用人力是有问题的。这种系统也可用于本地物种,帮助它们在通道中航行,或使它们偏离夹带区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信