Qian (Eric) Luo PhD, Bernard Black JD, David J. Magid MD, MPH, Frederick A. Masoudi MD, MSPH, Vinay Kini MD, MSHP, Ali Moghtaderi PhD
{"title":"A more complete measure of vertical integration between physicians and hospitals","authors":"Qian (Eric) Luo PhD, Bernard Black JD, David J. Magid MD, MPH, Frederick A. Masoudi MD, MSPH, Vinay Kini MD, MSHP, Ali Moghtaderi PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To develop an accurate and reproducible measure of vertical integration between physicians and hospitals (defined as hospital or health system employment of physicians), which can be used to assess the impact of integration on healthcare quality and spending.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We use multiple data sources including from the Internal Revenue Service, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and others to determine the Tax Identification Numbers (TINs) that hospitals and physicians use to bill Medicare for services, and link physician billing TINs to hospital-related TINs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a new measure of vertical integration, based on the TINs that hospitals and physicians use to bill Medicare, using a broad set of sources for hospital-related TINs. We considered physicians as hospital-employed if they bill Medicare primarily or exclusively using hospital-related TINs. We assessed integration status for all physicians who billed Medicare from 1999 to 2019. We compared this measure with others used in the existing literature. We conducted a simulation study which highlights the importance of accurately identifying integrated physicians when study the effects of integration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We extracted physician and hospital-related TINs from multiple sources, emphasizing specificity (a small proportion of nonintegrated physicians identified as integrated).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 12,269 hospital-related TINs, used for billing by 546,775 physicians. We estimate that the percentage of integrated physicians rose from 19% in 1999 to 43% in 2019. Our approach identifies many additional physician practices as integrated; a simpler TIN measure, comparable with prior work, identifies only 30% (3877) of the TINs we identify. A service location measure, used in prior work, has both many false positives and false negatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a new measure of hospital-physician integration. This measure is reproducible and identifies many additional physician practices as integrated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To develop an accurate and reproducible measure of vertical integration between physicians and hospitals (defined as hospital or health system employment of physicians), which can be used to assess the impact of integration on healthcare quality and spending.
Data Sources and Study Setting
We use multiple data sources including from the Internal Revenue Service, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and others to determine the Tax Identification Numbers (TINs) that hospitals and physicians use to bill Medicare for services, and link physician billing TINs to hospital-related TINs.
Study Design
We developed a new measure of vertical integration, based on the TINs that hospitals and physicians use to bill Medicare, using a broad set of sources for hospital-related TINs. We considered physicians as hospital-employed if they bill Medicare primarily or exclusively using hospital-related TINs. We assessed integration status for all physicians who billed Medicare from 1999 to 2019. We compared this measure with others used in the existing literature. We conducted a simulation study which highlights the importance of accurately identifying integrated physicians when study the effects of integration.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
We extracted physician and hospital-related TINs from multiple sources, emphasizing specificity (a small proportion of nonintegrated physicians identified as integrated).
Principal Findings
We identified 12,269 hospital-related TINs, used for billing by 546,775 physicians. We estimate that the percentage of integrated physicians rose from 19% in 1999 to 43% in 2019. Our approach identifies many additional physician practices as integrated; a simpler TIN measure, comparable with prior work, identifies only 30% (3877) of the TINs we identify. A service location measure, used in prior work, has both many false positives and false negatives.
Conclusion
We developed a new measure of hospital-physician integration. This measure is reproducible and identifies many additional physician practices as integrated.
目标对医生和医院之间的纵向整合(定义为医院或医疗系统雇佣医生)进行准确且可重复的测量,用于评估整合对医疗质量和支出的影响。数据来源和研究设置我们使用多种数据来源,包括国内税收署、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心及其他机构的数据,以确定医院和医生用于为医疗保险服务收费的税务识别码(TIN),并将医生收费 TIN 与医院相关 TIN 联系起来。研究设计我们根据医院和医生用于为医疗保险收费的 TIN,开发了一种新的纵向整合度量方法,并使用一套广泛的医院相关 TIN 来源。如果医生主要或完全使用与医院相关的 TIN 编码向医疗保险付费,我们就将其视为医院雇佣的医生。我们对 1999 年至 2019 年期间所有向医疗保险付费的医生的整合状态进行了评估。我们将这一衡量标准与现有文献中使用的其他衡量标准进行了比较。我们进行了一项模拟研究,该研究强调了在研究整合效果时准确识别整合医生的重要性。数据收集/提取方法我们从多个来源提取了医生和医院相关的 TIN,强调了特异性(一小部分非整合医生被识别为整合医生)。主要发现我们识别了 12,269 个医院相关 TIN,这些 TIN 被 546,775 名医生用于计费。我们估计,整合医生的比例从 1999 年的 19% 上升到 2019 年的 43%。我们的方法还能识别出更多的综合医生;与之前的工作类似,一种更简单的 TIN 测量方法只能识别出我们识别出的 TIN 中的 30%(3877)。我们开发了一种新的医院-医生一体化衡量方法。我们开发了一种新的医院-医生一体化衡量标准,这种衡量标准具有可重复性,能识别出更多的一体化医生。
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.