Factors Influencing the Resilience of Created Tidal Marshes in the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Daniel Stewart, Megan Lievesley, James E. Paterson, Daniel Hennigar, Robyn Ingham, Rob Knight, Brad Mason, Eric Balke
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Resilience of Created Tidal Marshes in the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia","authors":"Daniel Stewart, Megan Lievesley, James E. Paterson, Daniel Hennigar, Robyn Ingham, Rob Knight, Brad Mason, Eric Balke","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01802-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>More than 100 tidal marsh creation projects were constructed throughout the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia, Canada from the 1980s to present. Past studies described and evaluated many of these projects and found varied success, but the underlying factors that determine project outcomes remain uncertain. Combining field sampling, spatial analysis, and statistical modeling of plant communities, we aim to address this knowledge gap by asking what factors influence the resilience of created marshes, as measured by (1) persistence of marsh vegetation, (2) native species dominance, and (3) species richness. We observed marsh recession in 40 of the 78 projects visited, representing 23,666 m<sup>2</sup> (9.3%) of the 254,357 m<sup>2</sup> of created marsh surveyed. Increases in mean site elevation had a negative effect on percent recessed area, while sites in the north branch of the river and sites further upriver were more prone to recession. From field observations and data interpretation we suggest that wake erosion and Canada Goose (<i>Branta canadensis</i>) herbivory may be drivers behind these losses and warrant further investigation. Dominance of native species declined with distance upriver, though invasive cattail (<i>Typha angustifolia, T.</i> × <i>glauca)</i> defied this trend, dominating outer estuary sites, particularly closed embayments, when present. Native and non-native richness shared similar patterns and were comparable between reference and created marshes, increasing on average with elevation and distance upriver. These findings offer insight into how site design and location influence the outcome of marsh creation projects, and the challenges presented by stressors and environmental change in estuaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01802-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 100 tidal marsh creation projects were constructed throughout the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia, Canada from the 1980s to present. Past studies described and evaluated many of these projects and found varied success, but the underlying factors that determine project outcomes remain uncertain. Combining field sampling, spatial analysis, and statistical modeling of plant communities, we aim to address this knowledge gap by asking what factors influence the resilience of created marshes, as measured by (1) persistence of marsh vegetation, (2) native species dominance, and (3) species richness. We observed marsh recession in 40 of the 78 projects visited, representing 23,666 m2 (9.3%) of the 254,357 m2 of created marsh surveyed. Increases in mean site elevation had a negative effect on percent recessed area, while sites in the north branch of the river and sites further upriver were more prone to recession. From field observations and data interpretation we suggest that wake erosion and Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) herbivory may be drivers behind these losses and warrant further investigation. Dominance of native species declined with distance upriver, though invasive cattail (Typha angustifolia, T. × glauca) defied this trend, dominating outer estuary sites, particularly closed embayments, when present. Native and non-native richness shared similar patterns and were comparable between reference and created marshes, increasing on average with elevation and distance upriver. These findings offer insight into how site design and location influence the outcome of marsh creation projects, and the challenges presented by stressors and environmental change in estuaries.

Abstract Image

影响不列颠哥伦比亚省弗雷泽河口人造潮汐沼泽恢复能力的因素
从 20 世纪 80 年代至今,在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的弗雷泽河河口建造了 100 多个潮汐沼泽创建项目。过去的研究对其中的许多项目进行了描述和评估,发现这些项目取得了不同程度的成功,但决定项目成果的基本因素仍不确定。通过实地取样、空间分析和植物群落统计建模相结合的方法,我们旨在了解哪些因素会影响已营造沼泽的恢复力,并通过以下方面来衡量:(1)沼泽植被的持久性;(2)本地物种的优势;以及(3)物种的丰富性,从而填补这一知识空白。在考察的 78 个项目中,我们在 40 个项目中观察到了沼泽衰退现象,占所调查的 254,357 平方米人工沼泽中的 23,666 平方米(9.3%)。沼泽地平均海拔的增加对沼泽地凹陷面积的百分比有负面影响,而位于河流北支的沼泽地和位于河流上游的沼泽地更容易出现沼泽地凹陷。通过实地观察和数据解读,我们认为唤醒侵蚀和加拿大鹅(Branta canadensis)的草食可能是这些损失背后的驱动因素,值得进一步研究。本地物种的优势度随着上游距离的增加而下降,但入侵香蒲(Typha angustifolia, T. × glauca)却逆转了这一趋势,在河口外围,尤其是封闭的河口占据了优势。原生和非原生植物的丰富度具有相似的模式,在参照沼泽和新建沼泽之间具有可比性,平均随着海拔高度和上游距离的增加而增加。这些发现有助于深入了解场地设计和位置如何影响沼泽创建项目的结果,以及河口的压力因素和环境变化所带来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信