Comparison between inhalational anesthetics in terms of DNA damage and immunological markers

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mariana G. Braz, Mariane A. P. Silva, Carlos E. Scorza, Juliana R. Lara, José Reinaldo C. Braz, Leandro G. Braz
{"title":"Comparison between inhalational anesthetics in terms of DNA damage and immunological markers","authors":"Mariana G. Braz,&nbsp;Mariane A. P. Silva,&nbsp;Carlos E. Scorza,&nbsp;Juliana R. Lara,&nbsp;José Reinaldo C. Braz,&nbsp;Leandro G. Braz","doi":"10.1002/em.22600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compared genetic damage and immunological markers between surgical patients who underwent inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane or sevoflurane. Blood samples were collected from surgical patients (<i>n</i> = 18 in the isoflurane group and <i>n</i> = 17 in the sevoflurane group) at baseline (before the anesthesia procedure) and the day after anesthesia. DNA damage was detected using an alkaline comet assay; proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6 was detected by flow cytometry, and white blood cells were detected via an automatic hematology analyzer. The characteristics of both groups were similar, and neither of the two anesthetics induced DNA damage. Similarly, mild neutrophilia was observed after anesthesia in both groups. Increased IL-6 levels were observed 1 day after anesthesia regardless of the type of anesthetic, but this increase was greater in the isoflurane group. Our study suggested that isoflurane and sevoflurane administration may contribute to changes in the immune parameters measured, though no genotoxic hazard was identified, in healthy adult patients who undergo low-stress surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"65 3-4","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared genetic damage and immunological markers between surgical patients who underwent inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane or sevoflurane. Blood samples were collected from surgical patients (n = 18 in the isoflurane group and n = 17 in the sevoflurane group) at baseline (before the anesthesia procedure) and the day after anesthesia. DNA damage was detected using an alkaline comet assay; proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6 was detected by flow cytometry, and white blood cells were detected via an automatic hematology analyzer. The characteristics of both groups were similar, and neither of the two anesthetics induced DNA damage. Similarly, mild neutrophilia was observed after anesthesia in both groups. Increased IL-6 levels were observed 1 day after anesthesia regardless of the type of anesthetic, but this increase was greater in the isoflurane group. Our study suggested that isoflurane and sevoflurane administration may contribute to changes in the immune parameters measured, though no genotoxic hazard was identified, in healthy adult patients who undergo low-stress surgery.

不同吸入麻醉剂对 DNA 损伤和免疫标志物的影响比较
本研究比较了接受异氟醚或七氟烷吸入麻醉的手术患者的遗传损伤和免疫标记物。研究人员收集了手术患者(异氟烷组 18 人,七氟烷组 17 人)在基线(麻醉前)和麻醉后第二天的血液样本。使用碱性彗星试验检测DNA损伤;通过流式细胞术检测促炎性白细胞介素(IL)-6,并通过自动血液分析仪检测白细胞。两组的特征相似,两种麻醉剂均未诱发 DNA 损伤。同样,两组在麻醉后都观察到轻度中性粒细胞增多。无论使用哪种麻醉剂,麻醉后 1 天均可观察到 IL-6 水平升高,但异氟醚组的升高幅度更大。我们的研究表明,在接受低应激手术的健康成年患者中,使用异氟醚和七氟醚可能会导致所测得的免疫参数发生变化,但并未发现基因毒性危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信