Functional traits differ across an invasive tree species’ native, introduced, and invasive populations

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Michael J. Gundale, Lisa Lindberg, Alex Fajardo, Martin A. Nuñez, Marie-Charlotte Nilsson, Paul Kardol, Jaime Moyano, Susan J. Nuske
{"title":"Functional traits differ across an invasive tree species’ native, introduced, and invasive populations","authors":"Michael J. Gundale, Lisa Lindberg, Alex Fajardo, Martin A. Nuñez, Marie-Charlotte Nilsson, Paul Kardol, Jaime Moyano, Susan J. Nuske","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03316-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is often speculated that non-native invasive species undergo rapid changes in their phenotypic properties (i.e., traits) that provide adaptive advantage in their new environment. However, few studies have directly compared traits of invasive non-native species with their native counterparts to reveal whether such phenotypic changes occur, and which stages of initial introduction and subsequent invasion contribute to these shifts. We studied trait variation of an invasive tree, <i>Pinus contorta</i>, which is native to northwestern North America and invasive in the Patagonia region of South America (i.e., Argentina and Chile). Commercial plantations of <i>P. contorta</i> were introduced extensively in Patagonia from the 1970s onward, from an unknown seed origin within the Pacific Northwest, USA, where three sub-species are found, including subsp. <i>contorta</i>, <i>latifolia</i>, and <i>murrayana</i>. We employed a home-versus-away study approach, where we compared mean growth, defense, and reproduction trait values, and mean within-stand trait variation (Coefficient of Variation, CV) of Patagonia plantations, with the three native sub-species. We further compared mean traits, and trait CVs between invasive <i>P. contorta</i> and the Patagonia plantations from which they escaped. Patagonia plantations shared the most similar mean trait values with subsp. <i>latifolia</i> and <i>murrayana</i>, suggesting possible source populations. However, both mean trait values and trait CVs of Patagonia plantations differed from all three native sub-species, indicating potential founder effects, population bottlenecks, and/or plastic responses to their new environment that occurred during or after introduction. We also found evidence for selective change during invasion; however, these differences did not suggest growth traits were prioritized over defense traits, which was inconsistent with hypotheses that invaders exhibit an evolutionary trade-off between defense traits and growth traits. Our study highlights that processes occurring both at first introduction and establishment, as well as the subsequent invasion phase can influence the phenotype of successful invaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03316-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often speculated that non-native invasive species undergo rapid changes in their phenotypic properties (i.e., traits) that provide adaptive advantage in their new environment. However, few studies have directly compared traits of invasive non-native species with their native counterparts to reveal whether such phenotypic changes occur, and which stages of initial introduction and subsequent invasion contribute to these shifts. We studied trait variation of an invasive tree, Pinus contorta, which is native to northwestern North America and invasive in the Patagonia region of South America (i.e., Argentina and Chile). Commercial plantations of P. contorta were introduced extensively in Patagonia from the 1970s onward, from an unknown seed origin within the Pacific Northwest, USA, where three sub-species are found, including subsp. contorta, latifolia, and murrayana. We employed a home-versus-away study approach, where we compared mean growth, defense, and reproduction trait values, and mean within-stand trait variation (Coefficient of Variation, CV) of Patagonia plantations, with the three native sub-species. We further compared mean traits, and trait CVs between invasive P. contorta and the Patagonia plantations from which they escaped. Patagonia plantations shared the most similar mean trait values with subsp. latifolia and murrayana, suggesting possible source populations. However, both mean trait values and trait CVs of Patagonia plantations differed from all three native sub-species, indicating potential founder effects, population bottlenecks, and/or plastic responses to their new environment that occurred during or after introduction. We also found evidence for selective change during invasion; however, these differences did not suggest growth traits were prioritized over defense traits, which was inconsistent with hypotheses that invaders exhibit an evolutionary trade-off between defense traits and growth traits. Our study highlights that processes occurring both at first introduction and establishment, as well as the subsequent invasion phase can influence the phenotype of successful invaders.

Abstract Image

入侵树种的原生种群、引进种群和入侵种群的功能特征各不相同
人们通常推测,非外来入侵物种的表型特性(即性状)会发生快速变化,从而在新环境中获得适应优势。然而,很少有研究直接比较入侵的非本地物种与本地物种的性状,以揭示是否发生了这种表型变化,以及最初引入和随后入侵的哪个阶段促成了这些变化。我们研究了入侵树种孔雀松的性状变异,孔雀松原产于北美西北部,入侵南美洲巴塔哥尼亚地区(即阿根廷和智利)。从 20 世纪 70 年代起,巴塔哥尼亚地区广泛引进了商业种植的孔雀松,这些孔雀松的种子来自美国西北太平洋地区,来源不明,该地区有三个亚种,包括孔雀松亚种、拉蒂福利亚亚种和穆拉亚种。我们采用了 "同地-异地 "研究方法,比较了巴塔哥尼亚种植园与三个本地亚种的平均生长、防御和繁殖性状值,以及平均株内性状变异(变异系数,CV)。我们还进一步比较了入侵的孔雀草和它们逃出的巴塔哥尼亚种植园之间的平均性状和性状变异系数。巴塔哥尼亚种植园与 latifolia 和 murrayana 亚种的平均性状值最为相似,这表明可能存在源种群。然而,巴塔哥尼亚种植园的平均性状值和性状 CV 与所有三个本地亚种都不同,这表明在引入过程中或引入后可能会出现创始人效应、种群瓶颈和/或对新环境的可塑性反应。我们还发现了入侵过程中选择性变化的证据;然而,这些差异并不表明生长性状优先于防御性状,这与入侵者在防御性状和生长性状之间进行进化权衡的假设不一致。我们的研究强调,首次引入和建立过程以及随后的入侵阶段都会影响成功入侵者的表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信