Comparative efficacy of telehealth interventions on promoting cancer screening: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Shu Zhang MSN, Lin Zhou MSN, Li Yi MSc, Xiaoli Chen MSN, Yun Zhang MSN, Juejin Li PhD, Yalin Zhang MSN, Xiaolin Hu RN, PhD
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of telehealth interventions on promoting cancer screening: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Shu Zhang MSN,&nbsp;Lin Zhou MSN,&nbsp;Li Yi MSc,&nbsp;Xiaoli Chen MSN,&nbsp;Yun Zhang MSN,&nbsp;Juejin Li PhD,&nbsp;Yalin Zhang MSN,&nbsp;Xiaolin Hu RN, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer screening is a pivotal method for reducing mortality from disease, but the screening coverage is still lower than expected. Telehealth interventions demonstrated significant benefits in cancer care, yet there is currently no consensus on their impact on facilitating cancer screening or on the most effective remote technology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A network meta-analysis was conducted to detect the impact of telehealth interventions on cancer screening and to identify the most effective teletechnologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Six English databases were searched from inception until July 2023 to yield relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two individual authors completed the literature selection, data extraction, and methodological evaluations using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Traditional pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to identify the overall effects and compare different teletechnologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-four eligible RCTs involving 131,644 participants were enrolled. Overall, telehealth interventions showed statistically significant effects on the improvement of cancer screening. Subgroup analyses revealed that telehealth interventions were most effective for breast and cervical cancer screening, and rural populations also experienced benefits, but there was no improvement in screening for older adults. The network meta-analysis indicated that mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone were associated with more obvious improvements in screening than other teletechnologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study identified that telehealth interventions were effective for the completion of cancer screening and clarified the exact impact of telehealth on different cancer types, ages, and rural populations. Mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone are the three forms of teletechnologies most likely to improve cancer screening. More well-designed RCTs involving direct comparisons of different teletechnologies are needed in the future.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth interventions should be encouraged to facilitate cancer screening, and the selection of the optimal teletechnology based on the characteristics of the population is also necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"56 4","pages":"585-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer screening is a pivotal method for reducing mortality from disease, but the screening coverage is still lower than expected. Telehealth interventions demonstrated significant benefits in cancer care, yet there is currently no consensus on their impact on facilitating cancer screening or on the most effective remote technology.

Design

A network meta-analysis was conducted to detect the impact of telehealth interventions on cancer screening and to identify the most effective teletechnologies.

Methods

Six English databases were searched from inception until July 2023 to yield relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two individual authors completed the literature selection, data extraction, and methodological evaluations using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Traditional pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to identify the overall effects and compare different teletechnologies.

Results

Thirty-four eligible RCTs involving 131,644 participants were enrolled. Overall, telehealth interventions showed statistically significant effects on the improvement of cancer screening. Subgroup analyses revealed that telehealth interventions were most effective for breast and cervical cancer screening, and rural populations also experienced benefits, but there was no improvement in screening for older adults. The network meta-analysis indicated that mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone were associated with more obvious improvements in screening than other teletechnologies.

Conclusion

Our study identified that telehealth interventions were effective for the completion of cancer screening and clarified the exact impact of telehealth on different cancer types, ages, and rural populations. Mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone are the three forms of teletechnologies most likely to improve cancer screening. More well-designed RCTs involving direct comparisons of different teletechnologies are needed in the future.

Clinical Relevance

Telehealth interventions should be encouraged to facilitate cancer screening, and the selection of the optimal teletechnology based on the characteristics of the population is also necessary.

远程保健干预对促进癌症筛查的比较效果:随机对照试验网络荟萃分析
背景癌症筛查是降低疾病死亡率的关键方法,但筛查覆盖率仍低于预期。方法检索了六个英文数据库,以获得相关的随机对照试验 (RCT),检索时间从开始到 2023 年 7 月。两位作者使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具完成了文献筛选、数据提取和方法学评估。为确定总体效果并比较不同的远程技术,进行了传统的配对分析和网络荟萃分析。总体而言,远程医疗干预对癌症筛查的改善有显著的统计学效果。分组分析表明,远程医疗干预对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查最有效,农村人口也能从中受益,但老年人的筛查没有改善。网络荟萃分析表明,与其他电信技术相比,移动应用程序、视频加电话和短信加电话与筛查的明显改善相关。移动应用、视频加电话和短信加电话是最有可能改善癌症筛查的三种形式的远程技术。临床相关性应鼓励采取远程医疗干预措施来促进癌症筛查,同时有必要根据人群的特点选择最佳的远程医疗技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信