High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can predict osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root injury: randomized in vivo experimental study in a rabbit model

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can predict osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root injury: randomized in vivo experimental study in a rabbit model","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><p>The field of meniscal root preservation has undergone significant advancement over the past decades; however, the challenge remains to fully understand whether meniscal root repair can ultimately arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess longitudinal changes in articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and progression to meniscal extrusion (ME) using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Medial meniscus posterior root tear was surgically induced in 39 New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM, n ​= ​13); root tear left in situ (CT, n ​= ​13); and transtibial root repair (RR, n ​= ​13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. High resolution 4.7 Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed at baseline, after 2-, and 4-months of post-surgery. Cartilage thickness was calculated in medial and lateral compartments. In addition, the evaluation of ME, subchondral bone edema and healing potential after root repair were assessed too.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Progressive cartilage thinning, ME, and subchondral bone edema were evident in all 3 study groups after 4-months of follow-up. The mean cartilage thickness in the PM group was 0.53 ​mm (±0.050), 0.57 ​mm (±0.05) in the CT group, and 0.60 ​mm (±0.08) in the RR group. The PM group exhibited significantly higher cartilage loss when compared to the CT and RR groups (p ​&lt; ​0.001). Moreover, progressive ME and subchondral bone edema were associated with a more severe cartilage loss at the final follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Meniscal root repair did not halt but rather reduced the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Degenerative changes worsened at a rapid rate in the PM group compared to the RR and CT groups. Early cartilage swelling, persistent subchondral edema, and progressive ME predicted a more severe progression to knee OA in the CT and RR groups.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>II.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 526-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000695/pdfft?md5=62db8eaed8296fd339d55296f3849308&pid=1-s2.0-S2059775424000695-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance

The field of meniscal root preservation has undergone significant advancement over the past decades; however, the challenge remains to fully understand whether meniscal root repair can ultimately arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes.

Objective

To assess longitudinal changes in articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and progression to meniscal extrusion (ME) using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Medial meniscus posterior root tear was surgically induced in 39 New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into three experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM, n ​= ​13); root tear left in situ (CT, n ​= ​13); and transtibial root repair (RR, n ​= ​13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. High resolution 4.7 Tesla MRI of the knee joint was performed at baseline, after 2-, and 4-months of post-surgery. Cartilage thickness was calculated in medial and lateral compartments. In addition, the evaluation of ME, subchondral bone edema and healing potential after root repair were assessed too.

Results

Progressive cartilage thinning, ME, and subchondral bone edema were evident in all 3 study groups after 4-months of follow-up. The mean cartilage thickness in the PM group was 0.53 ​mm (±0.050), 0.57 ​mm (±0.05) in the CT group, and 0.60 ​mm (±0.08) in the RR group. The PM group exhibited significantly higher cartilage loss when compared to the CT and RR groups (p ​< ​0.001). Moreover, progressive ME and subchondral bone edema were associated with a more severe cartilage loss at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

Meniscal root repair did not halt but rather reduced the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Degenerative changes worsened at a rapid rate in the PM group compared to the RR and CT groups. Early cartilage swelling, persistent subchondral edema, and progressive ME predicted a more severe progression to knee OA in the CT and RR groups.

Level of evidence

II.

高分辨率磁共振成像可预测内侧半月板后根损伤后的骨关节炎进展:兔子模型的随机活体实验研究
在过去的几十年中,半月板根部保存领域取得了长足的进步;然而,全面了解半月板根部修复能否最终阻止或延缓骨关节炎的变化仍然是一项挑战。利用高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)评估关节软骨、软骨下骨的纵向变化以及半月板挤压(ME)的进展。通过手术诱导 39 只新西兰白兔的内侧半月板后根撕裂。动物被随机分配到三个实验组:兔根撕裂后半月板部分切除术(PM,n = 13);兔根原位撕裂(CT,n = 13);经胫骨兔根修复术(RR,n = 13)。对侧肢体作为健康对照。分别在基线期、术后2个月和4个月后对膝关节进行高分辨率4.7特斯拉核磁共振成像。计算了内侧和外侧的软骨厚度。此外,还评估了ME、软骨下骨水肿和根部修复后的愈合潜力。随访 4 个月后,所有 3 个研究组的软骨都明显变薄、ME 和软骨下骨水肿。PM 组的平均软骨厚度为 0.53 毫米(±0.050),CT 组为 0.57 毫米(±0.05),RR 组为 0.60 毫米(±0.08)。与 CT 组和 RR 组相比,PM 组的软骨损失明显较高(p < 0.001)。此外,在最后的随访中,ME和软骨下骨水肿的进展与更严重的软骨损失有关。半月板根部修复并没有阻止而是减轻了骨关节炎(OA)的进展。与RR组和CT组相比,PM组的退行性病变恶化速度更快。早期软骨肿胀、持续软骨下水肿和进行性ME预示着CT组和RR组膝关节OA的进展更为严重。II.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信