Low-dose versus standard-dose normal temporal bone CT in children: a comparison study

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
R. Rashma, Jyoti Kumar, Anju Garg, Radhika Batra, Ravi Meher, Ankita Phulia
{"title":"Low-dose versus standard-dose normal temporal bone CT in children: a comparison study","authors":"R. Rashma, Jyoti Kumar, Anju Garg, Radhika Batra, Ravi Meher, Ankita Phulia","doi":"10.1186/s43055-024-01254-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare the image quality of normal anatomical structures and radiation dose on low-dose (LDCT) and standard-dose (SDCT) temporal bone CT in children. The study included 45 LDCT (80 kV and 130 mAs) and 45 SDCT (120 kV and 170 mAs) scans in children, 1–15 years of age. LDCT and SDCT scans were analyzed on H60s and H70h reconstruction kernels, respectively. Two readers assessed the image quality for 25 anatomical structures, using a 5-point scale. A score of 3 and above was considered “sufficient” and 2 and below was considered “insufficient” image quality. Image noise, contrast, age and size-specific effective doses were calculated. Despite an increase in image noise on LDCT, image quality remained sufficient for most structures owing to increased image contrast. The median effective dose on LDCT, calculated with age-specific conversion factor, decreased by 72.9% and that calculated with size-specific conversion factor decreased by 81.8% compared to the dose on SDCT. LDCT provides comparable image quality for evaluation of temporal bone with significant reduction in radiation dose in children.","PeriodicalId":11540,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-024-01254-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the image quality of normal anatomical structures and radiation dose on low-dose (LDCT) and standard-dose (SDCT) temporal bone CT in children. The study included 45 LDCT (80 kV and 130 mAs) and 45 SDCT (120 kV and 170 mAs) scans in children, 1–15 years of age. LDCT and SDCT scans were analyzed on H60s and H70h reconstruction kernels, respectively. Two readers assessed the image quality for 25 anatomical structures, using a 5-point scale. A score of 3 and above was considered “sufficient” and 2 and below was considered “insufficient” image quality. Image noise, contrast, age and size-specific effective doses were calculated. Despite an increase in image noise on LDCT, image quality remained sufficient for most structures owing to increased image contrast. The median effective dose on LDCT, calculated with age-specific conversion factor, decreased by 72.9% and that calculated with size-specific conversion factor decreased by 81.8% compared to the dose on SDCT. LDCT provides comparable image quality for evaluation of temporal bone with significant reduction in radiation dose in children.
低剂量与标准剂量儿童正常颞骨 CT 的比较研究
比较低剂量(LDCT)和标准剂量(SDCT)儿童颞骨 CT 正常解剖结构的图像质量和辐射剂量。研究包括对 1-15 岁儿童进行的 45 次 LDCT(80 kV 和 130 mAs)和 45 次 SDCT(120 kV 和 170 mAs)扫描。LDCT 和 SDCT 扫描分别在 H60s 和 H70h 重建内核上进行分析。两名阅读者采用 5 级评分法对 25 个解剖结构的图像质量进行评估。3 分及以上为 "足够",2 分及以下为 "不足"。计算了图像噪音、对比度、年龄和体型的有效剂量。尽管 LDCT 的图像噪声有所增加,但由于图像对比度提高,大多数结构的图像质量仍然足够。与 SDCT 的剂量相比,采用年龄特定换算系数计算的 LDCT 有效剂量中位数减少了 72.9%,采用体型特定换算系数计算的有效剂量中位数减少了 81.8%。LDCT 可为儿童颞骨评估提供相当的图像质量,同时显著降低辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信