Governing hybrid organisations: Lessons from the provision of local sports facility services in 2020s Finland

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Kerkko Huhtanen, Anna‐Katriina Salmikangas, Hannu Itkonen
{"title":"Governing hybrid organisations: Lessons from the provision of local sports facility services in 2020s Finland","authors":"Kerkko Huhtanen, Anna‐Katriina Salmikangas, Hannu Itkonen","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>The Finnish welfare society is based on strong public and civic sectors with an emerging private sector. In the context of sports, the public sector's statutory task has been to provide opportunities and facilities for citizens, whereas the civic sector has been responsible for organising activities. However, since the 1990s, economic recessions, new public management doctrines, and other societal changes have mixed this institutionalised setting and increased hybridity in the provision of public services. This study examines how hybridity is manifested and governed in the provision of local sports facility services in contemporary Finland through a literature review and a multiple case study focusing on three sports facility construction projects. The projects had partners from all societal sectors and, organisationally, assumed different forms: privately owned, sports clubs co‐owned, and municipally owned enterprises. The case data consist of thematic interviews and project documentation and are analysed with theory‐driven content analysis. The study deepens understanding of the mixed ownership structures, various funding arrangements, control mechanisms, and management of goal incongruency found in hybrid facility‐provider organisations. Additionally, it describes changing roles and challenges that municipalities face in hybrid settings and develops recommendations for future research on hybridity and sports policy.Points for practitioners<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Note that the capacity to steer the operations of hybrids in municipal services provision can be obtained in various ways which do not entail formal ownership.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Deepen your understanding of the goals and commitment incentives of the different stakeholders planned to be involved in the hybrid project.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Consider jointly written formal contracts as tools for managing goal ambiguity and incongruence and for creating trust in the hybrid arrangement.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Examine comprehensively the resourcing of the facility‐provider organisation in the operational phase of the facility when evaluating the funding arrangements and public value creation of hybrid facility projects.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Prepare to become a practitioner and the object subjected to more diverse forms of control when committing to hybrid arrangements with various stakeholders.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Finnish welfare society is based on strong public and civic sectors with an emerging private sector. In the context of sports, the public sector's statutory task has been to provide opportunities and facilities for citizens, whereas the civic sector has been responsible for organising activities. However, since the 1990s, economic recessions, new public management doctrines, and other societal changes have mixed this institutionalised setting and increased hybridity in the provision of public services. This study examines how hybridity is manifested and governed in the provision of local sports facility services in contemporary Finland through a literature review and a multiple case study focusing on three sports facility construction projects. The projects had partners from all societal sectors and, organisationally, assumed different forms: privately owned, sports clubs co‐owned, and municipally owned enterprises. The case data consist of thematic interviews and project documentation and are analysed with theory‐driven content analysis. The study deepens understanding of the mixed ownership structures, various funding arrangements, control mechanisms, and management of goal incongruency found in hybrid facility‐provider organisations. Additionally, it describes changing roles and challenges that municipalities face in hybrid settings and develops recommendations for future research on hybridity and sports policy.Points for practitioners Note that the capacity to steer the operations of hybrids in municipal services provision can be obtained in various ways which do not entail formal ownership. Deepen your understanding of the goals and commitment incentives of the different stakeholders planned to be involved in the hybrid project. Consider jointly written formal contracts as tools for managing goal ambiguity and incongruence and for creating trust in the hybrid arrangement. Examine comprehensively the resourcing of the facility‐provider organisation in the operational phase of the facility when evaluating the funding arrangements and public value creation of hybrid facility projects. Prepare to become a practitioner and the object subjected to more diverse forms of control when committing to hybrid arrangements with various stakeholders.
管理混合组织:2020 年代芬兰提供地方体育设施服务的经验教训
芬兰福利社会的基础是强大的公共部门和民间部门,以及新兴的私营部门。在体育方面,公共部门的法定任务是为公民提供机会和设施,而民间部门则负责组织活动。然而,自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,经济衰退、新的公共管理理论和其他社会变革混杂了这种制度化的环境,增加了提供公共服务的混合性。本研究通过文献综述和以三个体育设施建设项目为重点的多案例研究,探讨了当代芬兰在提供地方体育设施服务时如何体现和管理混合性。这些项目的合作伙伴来自各个社会部门,组织形式也各不相同:私营企业、体育俱乐部共同拥有的企业和市政当局拥有的企业。案例数据包括专题访谈和项目文件,并通过理论驱动的内容分析进行了分析。本研究加深了对混合所有制结构、各种资金安排、控制机制以及混合设施提供者组织目标不一致管理的理解。此外,本研究还描述了市政当局在混合环境中不断变化的角色和面临的挑战,并为未来有关混合性和体育政策的研究提出了建议。 从业人员注意事项 在提供市政服务时,可以通过各种方式获得指导混合体运营的能力,而不需要正式的所有权。深入了解计划参与混合项目的不同利益相关者的目标和承诺动机。考虑将共同撰写的正式合同作为管理目标模糊性和不一致性以及在混合安排中建立信任的工具。在评估混合设施项目的资金安排和公共价值创造时,全面审查设施运营阶段设施提供方组织的资源配置。在与不同的利益相关者进行混合安排时,准备成为一名实践者和受控对象,接受更多样化的控制形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信