Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence

Brydie Willburger, Zhuoran Chen, Kylie J. Mansfield
{"title":"Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence","authors":"Brydie Willburger, Zhuoran Chen, Kylie J. Mansfield","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundMany women are embarrassed to discuss pelvic floor exercises with health professionals during pregnancy; instead they search the internet for information on pelvic floor exercises.AimsThis project investigated the quality and health literacy demand in terms of readability, understandability and actionability of information available on the internet relating to pelvic floor exercises.Materials and MethodsAn analysis was conducted on 150 websites and 43 videos obtained from three consecutive Google searches relating to pelvic floor exercises. Websites were assessed for Health on the Net certification. Readability was assessed using a readability calculator, and understandability/actionability of website and video information was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for Print or Audiovisual Materials.ResultsLess than one‐third (24%) of the websites were certified for quality. The median readability score for the websites was grade 9 and the websites and videos both rated highly for understandability and actionability. The median understandability score for the website information was 87%, and the median actionability score was 71%. The median understandability score of the video information was 95.5% and the median actionability score was 100%. The understandability and actionability of video information was also significantly greater than that for website information (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01).ConclusionClinicians could consider directing patients to video‐based resources when advising online pelvic floor exercise resources for women during pregnancy, especially those with lower health literacy.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMany women are embarrassed to discuss pelvic floor exercises with health professionals during pregnancy; instead they search the internet for information on pelvic floor exercises.AimsThis project investigated the quality and health literacy demand in terms of readability, understandability and actionability of information available on the internet relating to pelvic floor exercises.Materials and MethodsAn analysis was conducted on 150 websites and 43 videos obtained from three consecutive Google searches relating to pelvic floor exercises. Websites were assessed for Health on the Net certification. Readability was assessed using a readability calculator, and understandability/actionability of website and video information was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for Print or Audiovisual Materials.ResultsLess than one‐third (24%) of the websites were certified for quality. The median readability score for the websites was grade 9 and the websites and videos both rated highly for understandability and actionability. The median understandability score for the website information was 87%, and the median actionability score was 71%. The median understandability score of the video information was 95.5% and the median actionability score was 100%. The understandability and actionability of video information was also significantly greater than that for website information (P < 0.01).ConclusionClinicians could consider directing patients to video‐based resources when advising online pelvic floor exercise resources for women during pregnancy, especially those with lower health literacy.
盆底肌锻炼减少压力性尿失禁在线信息的质量和健康素养需求调查
背景许多妇女在怀孕期间都不好意思与医疗专业人员讨论盆底肌锻炼的问题;相反,她们会在互联网上搜索有关盆底肌锻炼的信息。本项目从可读性、可理解性和可操作性等方面调查了互联网上有关盆底肌锻炼信息的质量和健康素养需求。对网站进行了网络健康认证评估。可读性使用可读性计算器进行评估,网站和视频信息的可理解性/可操作性使用针对印刷或视听材料的患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)进行评估。网站的可读性得分中位数为 9 级,网站和视频的可理解性和可操作性得分都很高。网站信息的可理解性得分中位数为 87%,可操作性得分中位数为 71%。视频信息的可理解性得分中位数为 95.5%,可操作性得分中位数为 100%。视频信息的可理解性和可操作性也明显高于网站信息(P < 0.01)。结论临床医生在为孕期妇女,尤其是健康知识水平较低的妇女提供在线盆底肌锻炼资源建议时,可以考虑引导患者使用视频资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信