Real-world efficacy, roll-out and uptake of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab as COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in people with multiple sclerosis and neuroimmunological conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Louise Rath, Wei Zhen Yeh, Angie Roldan, Robb Wesselingh, Michael Zhong, Tracie Tan, Nabil Seery, Francesca Bridge, YiChao Foong, Olga Skibina, Cassie Nesbitt, Helmut Butzkueven, Mastura Monif, Anneke van der Walt
{"title":"Real-world efficacy, roll-out and uptake of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab as COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in people with multiple sclerosis and neuroimmunological conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Louise Rath, Wei Zhen Yeh, Angie Roldan, Robb Wesselingh, Michael Zhong, Tracie Tan, Nabil Seery, Francesca Bridge, YiChao Foong, Olga Skibina, Cassie Nesbitt, Helmut Butzkueven, Mastura Monif, Anneke van der Walt","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In Australia, tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg was a government-funded pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and other neuroimmunological conditions (pwNIc) treated with anti-CD20 antibodies or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators were eligible. Objective To analyse the roll-out, uptake and real-world efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the prevention and severity of COVID-19. To assess compliance with uptake depending on the location of delivery. Methods We undertook a single-centre study. 440 pwMS and pwNIc were eligible. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of COVID-19 during follow-up and to assess predictors of uptake among those who consented. Results Of the eligible pwMS and pwNIc in our service, 52.7% (233/440) requested a consultation and were included in this study. Consultation resulted in 71.7% of people (167/233) receiving the treatment. Of these, 94.0% (157/167) had received three or more COVID-19 vaccines. Among those who received a single dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 19.16% (32/167) tested positive for COVID-19 during the observational window. The majority of these were on ocrelizumab (68.8% (22/32)). None of those with COVID-19 required hospitalisation or supplemental oxygen. There was no difference in odds of COVID-19 during the observation period between those who received and did not receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab (adjusted OR, aOR 2.16 (95% CI 0.82 to 6.85), p=0.43). Uptake of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was highest when offered at the hospital infusion centre (aOR 3.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 9.94) relative to referral to the local pharmacy, p=0.04). Conclusion Tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration did not protect against subsequent COVID-19 in our cohort. Compliance with uptake was influenced by administration location. Data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In Australia, tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg was a government-funded pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and other neuroimmunological conditions (pwNIc) treated with anti-CD20 antibodies or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators were eligible. Objective To analyse the roll-out, uptake and real-world efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the prevention and severity of COVID-19. To assess compliance with uptake depending on the location of delivery. Methods We undertook a single-centre study. 440 pwMS and pwNIc were eligible. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of COVID-19 during follow-up and to assess predictors of uptake among those who consented. Results Of the eligible pwMS and pwNIc in our service, 52.7% (233/440) requested a consultation and were included in this study. Consultation resulted in 71.7% of people (167/233) receiving the treatment. Of these, 94.0% (157/167) had received three or more COVID-19 vaccines. Among those who received a single dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 19.16% (32/167) tested positive for COVID-19 during the observational window. The majority of these were on ocrelizumab (68.8% (22/32)). None of those with COVID-19 required hospitalisation or supplemental oxygen. There was no difference in odds of COVID-19 during the observation period between those who received and did not receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab (adjusted OR, aOR 2.16 (95% CI 0.82 to 6.85), p=0.43). Uptake of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was highest when offered at the hospital infusion centre (aOR 3.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 9.94) relative to referral to the local pharmacy, p=0.04). Conclusion Tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration did not protect against subsequent COVID-19 in our cohort. Compliance with uptake was influenced by administration location. Data are available on reasonable request.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,将肌肉注射替沙吉单抗/西格维单抗作为多发性硬化症和神经免疫疾病患者的 COVID-19 暴露前预防药物的实际疗效、推广和吸收情况
背景 在澳大利亚,tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg是一种由政府资助的COVID-19暴露前预防药物,接受抗CD20抗体或1-磷酸鞘磷脂受体调节剂治疗的多发性硬化症(pwMS)和其他神经免疫疾病(pwNIc)患者符合条件。目标 分析 tixagevimab/cilgavimab 在预防和治疗 COVID-19 方面的推广、吸收和实际疗效。评估不同分娩地点对吸收的依从性。方法 我们开展了一项单中心研究。共有 440 名产妇和新生儿符合条件。采用逻辑回归法评估随访期间COVID-19的预测因素,并评估同意接受者中接受COVID-19的预测因素。结果 在我们服务的符合条件的住院病人和残疾人中,52.7%(233/440)要求进行咨询并被纳入本研究。咨询后,71.7% 的患者(167/233)接受了治疗。其中,94.0%(157/167)的人接种过三次或三次以上的 COVID-19 疫苗。在接受过单剂 tixagevimab/cilgavimab 治疗的患者中,19.16%(32/167)的人在观察窗口期检测出 COVID-19 阳性。其中大部分患者使用的是奥克雷珠单抗(68.8%(22/32))。COVID-19患者中没有人需要住院治疗或补充氧气。在观察期内,接受和未接受替沙吉单抗/西格维单抗治疗的患者发生COVID-19的几率没有差异(调整OR,aOR为2.16(95% CI为0.82至6.85),P=0.43)。医院输液中心提供的替沙吉单抗/西格维单抗的使用率最高(相对于转诊至当地药房,aOR 为 3.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 9.94),p=0.04)。结论 在我们的队列中,使用 Tixagevimab/cilgavimab 并不能预防后续 COVID-19 的发生。服药依从性受服药地点的影响。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信