Clinical validation of automated depth camera-based measurement of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Zhaoyang Wang, Tao Zhang, Jingyuan Fan, Fanbin Gu, Qiuhua Yu, Honggang Wang, Jiantao Yang, Qingtang Zhu
{"title":"Clinical validation of automated depth camera-based measurement of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity","authors":"Zhaoyang Wang, Tao Zhang, Jingyuan Fan, Fanbin Gu, Qiuhua Yu, Honggang Wang, Jiantao Yang, Qingtang Zhu","doi":"10.1177/02692155241251434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveDepth camera-based measurement has demonstrated efficacy in automated assessment of upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment for paralysis rehabilitation. However, there is a lack of adequately sized studies to provide clinical support. Thus, we developed an automated system utilizing depth camera and machine learning, and assessed its feasibility and validity in a clinical setting.DesignValidation and feasibility study of a measurement instrument based on single cross-sectional data.SettingRehabilitation unit in a general hospitalParticipantsNinety-five patients with hemiparesis admitted for inpatient rehabilitation unit (2021–2023).Main measuresScores for each item, excluding those related to reflexes, were computed utilizing machine learning models trained on participant videos and readouts from force test devices, while the remaining reflex scores were derived through regression algorithms. Concurrent criterion validity was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement and Cohen's Kappa coefficient for ordinal scores of individual items, as well as correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients for total scores. Video-based manual assessment was also conducted and compared to the automated tools.ResultThe majority of patients completed the assessment without therapist intervention. The automated scoring models demonstrated superior validity compared to video-based manual assessment across most items. The total scores derived from the automated assessment exhibited a high coefficient of 0.960. However, the validity of force test items utilizing force sensing resistors was relatively low.ConclusionThe integration of depth camera technology and machine learning models for automated Fugl-Meyer Assessment demonstrated acceptable validity and feasibility, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in rehabilitation assessment.","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241251434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveDepth camera-based measurement has demonstrated efficacy in automated assessment of upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment for paralysis rehabilitation. However, there is a lack of adequately sized studies to provide clinical support. Thus, we developed an automated system utilizing depth camera and machine learning, and assessed its feasibility and validity in a clinical setting.DesignValidation and feasibility study of a measurement instrument based on single cross-sectional data.SettingRehabilitation unit in a general hospitalParticipantsNinety-five patients with hemiparesis admitted for inpatient rehabilitation unit (2021–2023).Main measuresScores for each item, excluding those related to reflexes, were computed utilizing machine learning models trained on participant videos and readouts from force test devices, while the remaining reflex scores were derived through regression algorithms. Concurrent criterion validity was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement and Cohen's Kappa coefficient for ordinal scores of individual items, as well as correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients for total scores. Video-based manual assessment was also conducted and compared to the automated tools.ResultThe majority of patients completed the assessment without therapist intervention. The automated scoring models demonstrated superior validity compared to video-based manual assessment across most items. The total scores derived from the automated assessment exhibited a high coefficient of 0.960. However, the validity of force test items utilizing force sensing resistors was relatively low.ConclusionThe integration of depth camera technology and machine learning models for automated Fugl-Meyer Assessment demonstrated acceptable validity and feasibility, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in rehabilitation assessment.
基于深度摄像头的上肢福格尔-迈耶评估自动测量的临床验证
目标基于深度摄像头的测量方法已被证明可有效自动评估上肢瘫痪康复的 Fugl-Meyer 评估。然而,目前还缺乏足够规模的研究来提供临床支持。因此,我们利用深度摄像头和机器学习开发了一套自动系统,并评估了其在临床环境中的可行性和有效性。设计基于单个横断面数据的测量工具的验证和可行性研究。主要测量方法利用受试者视频和测力设备读数训练的机器学习模型计算每个项目的分数(不包括与反射相关的项目),而其余反射分数则通过回归算法得出。使用单个项目序数得分的灵敏度、特异性、一致性百分比和科恩卡帕系数,以及总分的相关性和类内相关系数,对并行标准有效性进行了评估。结果大多数患者在没有治疗师干预的情况下完成了评估。在大多数项目上,自动评分模型的有效性都优于视频人工评估。自动评估得出的总分系数高达 0.960。结论将深度摄像技术和机器学习模型整合到自动化 Fugl-Meyer 评估中,显示出了可接受的有效性和可行性,表明其有潜力成为康复评估中的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信