Stored collections of museums: an overview of how visible storage makes them accessible

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lara Corona
{"title":"Stored collections of museums: an overview of how visible storage makes them accessible","authors":"Lara Corona","doi":"10.1108/cc-06-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to provide an overview of the dimension of stored collections displayed in visible storage and to indicate the main factors which hinder their accessibility.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study is based on quantitative analysis: a survey was conducted through the offices of International Council of Museums and direct invitations to 2,558 museums located worldwide.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study estimated 32% on average the share of stored collections displayed in visible storage. The analysis provides a picture of how many stored items are made accessible in visible storage across the continents, according to the collection’s type and size and the museums’ legal status. In addition, several aspects of visible storage are investigated to highlight whether or not it truly enables museums to achieve accessibility of their stored collections and which factors might hinder the accessibility. Amid them, the foremost factors involve the inadequacy of resources, such as the lack of staff (71%) and poor budget (68%). Because of it, museums are prone to setting up offsite storage (37%), often 16 km far from the city centre, thereby questioning the concept of accessibility itself.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>One major limitation of this study is that it does not consider people’s standpoints. Therefore, the author recommends that future studies focus on what people opine on visible storage, such as their appreciation of the display format, the behind-the-scenes, their need for interpretation and the degree of satisfaction with their information needs, as well as their perception of the size of stored collections.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>These findings suggest that museums could take action in areas whereby the data demonstrated weaknesses in terms of accessibility. For instance, museums could set up a shuttle service or arrange public transportation service to allow people to visit offsite storage. Additionally, financial accessibility might be achieved by not charging some groups (elderly, students, etc.).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The topic of stored collections and their accessibility has crucial social implications because not displaying collections triggers inequality amid social groups of excluded people and a small elite.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study focuses on visible storage as a possible solution to enhance the accessibility of collections and indicates to what extent visible storage provides this accessibility. On the contrary, previous research did not estimate how much visible storage impacts the accessibility of stored collections.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-06-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to provide an overview of the dimension of stored collections displayed in visible storage and to indicate the main factors which hinder their accessibility.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is based on quantitative analysis: a survey was conducted through the offices of International Council of Museums and direct invitations to 2,558 museums located worldwide.

Findings

The study estimated 32% on average the share of stored collections displayed in visible storage. The analysis provides a picture of how many stored items are made accessible in visible storage across the continents, according to the collection’s type and size and the museums’ legal status. In addition, several aspects of visible storage are investigated to highlight whether or not it truly enables museums to achieve accessibility of their stored collections and which factors might hinder the accessibility. Amid them, the foremost factors involve the inadequacy of resources, such as the lack of staff (71%) and poor budget (68%). Because of it, museums are prone to setting up offsite storage (37%), often 16 km far from the city centre, thereby questioning the concept of accessibility itself.

Research limitations/implications

One major limitation of this study is that it does not consider people’s standpoints. Therefore, the author recommends that future studies focus on what people opine on visible storage, such as their appreciation of the display format, the behind-the-scenes, their need for interpretation and the degree of satisfaction with their information needs, as well as their perception of the size of stored collections.

Practical implications

These findings suggest that museums could take action in areas whereby the data demonstrated weaknesses in terms of accessibility. For instance, museums could set up a shuttle service or arrange public transportation service to allow people to visit offsite storage. Additionally, financial accessibility might be achieved by not charging some groups (elderly, students, etc.).

Social implications

The topic of stored collections and their accessibility has crucial social implications because not displaying collections triggers inequality amid social groups of excluded people and a small elite.

Originality/value

This study focuses on visible storage as a possible solution to enhance the accessibility of collections and indicates to what extent visible storage provides this accessibility. On the contrary, previous research did not estimate how much visible storage impacts the accessibility of stored collections.

博物馆的存储藏品:概述可视存储如何使藏品便于获取
本研究以定量分析为基础:通过国际博物馆理事会办事处进行调查,并直接邀请全球 2558 家博物馆参与。研究结果本研究估计,以可视存储方式展示的藏品平均占 32%。根据藏品的类型和规模以及博物馆的法律地位,该分析提供了各大洲有多少藏品可以通过可视存储进行展示的情况。此外,还对可视存储的几个方面进行了调查,以强调可视存储是否能真正使博物馆实现其存储藏品的无障碍化,以及哪些因素可能会阻碍藏品的无障碍化。其中,最主要的因素是资源不足,如缺乏工作人员(71%)和预算不足(68%)。研究的局限性/启示本研究的一个主要局限性是没有考虑人们的立场。因此,作者建议今后的研究应关注人们对可视存储的看法,如他们对展示形式的欣赏、幕后情况、他们对解说的需求和对信息需求的满足程度,以及他们对存储藏品规模的看法。例如,博物馆可以设立班车服务或安排公共交通服务,方便人们参观馆外藏品。社会影响关于藏品存储及其无障碍性的话题具有重要的社会影响,因为不展示藏品会引发被排斥人群和少数精英社会群体之间的不平等。原创性/价值这项研究关注可视存储,将其作为提高藏品无障碍性的可能解决方案,并指出可视存储在多大程度上提供了这种无障碍性。相反,以往的研究并未估计可视存储对所存储藏品的可访问性有多大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collection and Curation
Collection and Curation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信