A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial of the Acute Antisuicidal and Antidepressant Effects of Intranasal (R,S)-Ketamine in Severe Unipolar and Bipolar Depression With and Without Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorder.

Gregory H Jones, Courtney M Vecera, Ana C Ruiz, Hanjing E Wu, Sophia I McInturff, Maria J Orejarena, Kacy A Smith, Jair C Soares, Carlos A Zarate, Scott D Lane, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira
{"title":"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial of the Acute Antisuicidal and Antidepressant Effects of Intranasal (R,S)-Ketamine in Severe Unipolar and Bipolar Depression With and Without Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorder.","authors":"Gregory H Jones, Courtney M Vecera, Ana C Ruiz, Hanjing E Wu, Sophia I McInturff, Maria J Orejarena, Kacy A Smith, Jair C Soares, Carlos A Zarate, Scott D Lane, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira","doi":"10.4088/jcp.23m14974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Objective:</b> Although individuals with a family history of alcohol use disorder (AUD) have a superior antidepressant response to ketamine, outcomes in patients with current AUD remain unclear. This study sought to investigate whether intranasal (IN) racemic (<i>R,S</i>)-ketamine had antisuicidal and antidepressant effects in unipolar and bipolar depression and whether comorbid AUD conferred superior antisuicidal outcomes for patients. <b>Methods:</b> This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (May 2018 to January 2022) of single administration, fixed-dose (50 mg) IN (<i>R,S</i>)-ketamine (or saline comparator) in unmedicated inpatients meeting <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, criteria for a current major depressive episode (bipolar or unipolar), with current suicidal ideation (SI) and past attempt. Patients with and without comorbid AUD were enrolled. Change in Scale for Suicide Ideation score was the primary outcome measure, and change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score was the secondary outcome measure. <b>Results:</b> No significant group × time effect was noted for SI (<i>F</i> = 1.1, <i>P</i> = .36). A statistical trend toward superior improvement in suicidality was observed in participants with comorbid AUD. The group × time interaction was significant for improvements in depression (<i>F</i> = 3.06, <i>P</i> = .03) and largely unaffected by comorbid AUD or primary mood disorder type. Within the ketamine group, a significant correlation was observed between improvement in depressive symptoms and SI for patients without comorbid AUD (<i>r</i> =0.927, <i>P</i> = .023) that was absent in patients with AUD (<i>r</i> = 0.39, <i>P</i> = .44). <b>Conclusion:</b> IN ketamine induced rapid antidepressant effects compared to placebo but did not significantly alter SI scores. The treatment was well tolerated. Continued investigation with IN ketamine as a practical alternative to current formulations is warranted. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539887.","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.23m14974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although individuals with a family history of alcohol use disorder (AUD) have a superior antidepressant response to ketamine, outcomes in patients with current AUD remain unclear. This study sought to investigate whether intranasal (IN) racemic (R,S)-ketamine had antisuicidal and antidepressant effects in unipolar and bipolar depression and whether comorbid AUD conferred superior antisuicidal outcomes for patients. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (May 2018 to January 2022) of single administration, fixed-dose (50 mg) IN (R,S)-ketamine (or saline comparator) in unmedicated inpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, criteria for a current major depressive episode (bipolar or unipolar), with current suicidal ideation (SI) and past attempt. Patients with and without comorbid AUD were enrolled. Change in Scale for Suicide Ideation score was the primary outcome measure, and change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score was the secondary outcome measure. Results: No significant group × time effect was noted for SI (F = 1.1, P = .36). A statistical trend toward superior improvement in suicidality was observed in participants with comorbid AUD. The group × time interaction was significant for improvements in depression (F = 3.06, P = .03) and largely unaffected by comorbid AUD or primary mood disorder type. Within the ketamine group, a significant correlation was observed between improvement in depressive symptoms and SI for patients without comorbid AUD (r =0.927, P = .023) that was absent in patients with AUD (r = 0.39, P = .44). Conclusion: IN ketamine induced rapid antidepressant effects compared to placebo but did not significantly alter SI scores. The treatment was well tolerated. Continued investigation with IN ketamine as a practical alternative to current formulations is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539887.
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验:鼻内注射(R,S)氯胺酮对伴有或不伴有酒精使用障碍的严重单相和双相抑郁症患者的急性抗自杀和抗抑郁作用
目的:尽管有酒精使用障碍(AUD)家族史的患者对氯胺酮的抗抑郁反应较好,但目前AUD患者的治疗效果仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨鼻内(IN)外消旋(R,S)氯胺酮是否对单相和双相抑郁症患者具有抗自杀和抗抑郁作用,以及合并有 AUD 的患者是否具有更好的抗自杀效果。研究方法这是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(2018年5月至2022年1月),对符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版文本修订版标准的当前重度抑郁发作(双相或单相)、当前有自杀意念(SI)和既往有自杀企图的未用药住院患者进行单次给药、固定剂量(50毫克)IN(R,S)-氯胺酮(或生理盐水比较药)治疗。有或没有合并 AUD 的患者均被纳入研究。自杀意念量表评分的变化是主要结果测量指标,蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评分量表评分的变化是次要结果测量指标。结果显示自杀意念没有明显的组别 × 时间效应(F = 1.1,P = .36)。在合并有 AUD 的参与者中观察到自杀倾向有明显改善的统计学趋势。组与时间的交互作用对抑郁症的改善有显著影响(F = 3.06,P = .03),且基本不受合并 AUD 或原发性情绪障碍类型的影响。在氯胺酮组中,未合并 AUD 的患者抑郁症状的改善与 SI 之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.927,P = .023),而 AUD 患者则不存在这种相关性(r = 0.39,P = .44)。结论与安慰剂相比,IN氯胺酮能迅速产生抗抑郁效果,但不会显著改变SI评分。治疗的耐受性良好。作为目前配方的一种实用替代品,IN氯胺酮值得继续研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03539887:NCT03539887。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信