Rethinking Greek Genius: Reflections on Demon Entrepreneurs

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thomas W. Gallant
{"title":"Rethinking Greek Genius: Reflections on Demon Entrepreneurs","authors":"Thomas W. Gallant","doi":"10.1353/mgs.2024.a925798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Rethinking Greek Genius:<span>Reflections on <em>Demon Entrepreneurs</em><sup>1</sup></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Thomas W. Gallant (bio) </li> </ul> <p>This fascinating collection of essays examines \"Greek genius\" from various angles and interpretive stances. The concept is rooted in two stereotypes: the resourceful and clever Odysseus from Homer's epics and the deceitful Sinon from Virgil's works. Collectively, the essays argue that the Greek genius is closely tied to economic success, with shipping and commerce playing a crucial role in spreading Enlightenment ideas and fostering political emancipation in Greek lands. The argument suggests a reciprocal relationship between economic success and education, with each reinforcing the other. The volume also emphasizes the persistence of the Greek genius stereotype as a myth of redemption despite Greece's limited resources and uncertain prospects. Nations have traditionally crafted self-images of their character that define them and distinguish them from others. British reserve and stalwartness, for example, are captured in the phrase \"stiff upper lip.\" Americans have crafted a self-conception around concepts such as \"rugged individualism\" and \"the self-made man.\" For Greeks, the equivalent is the idea of the Greek genius, and this richly textured collection explores the content and impact of the concept on the political, social, and economic levels. It contributes to the broader discussion surrounding the history of Greek identity, particularly its complex interplay with cultural stereotypes, economic factors, and education.</p> <p>In addition to discussing the structure and content of the volume, Gounaris, in his introduction, grapples with the thorny issue of what constitutes the \"Greek genius\" and how the phrase's meaning has changed over the ages. Translating Ἑλληνικὸν δαιμόνιον from ancient Greek to modern English is a challenging task because it was polyvalent and context-dependent. Gounaris argues that, in ancient Greek, both <em>daimon</em> and <em>daimonion</em> signify \"god\" or \"deity.\" In modern Greek, they are likewise synonymous and encompass religious and <strong>[End Page 95]</strong> divine connotations as well as exceptional ingenuity in the broader sense of logical and emotional intelligence. Despite the nineteenth-century business opportunities available to diaspora Greeks, the <em>acquired</em> feature of ingenuity in the Greek temperament has been largely overlooked. The Greek character, with its various talents such as shrewdness and cunning, has been well studied, but there has been a tendency to neglect the (re)fashioning of the Greek genius as a constructed trait rather than an inherent one.</p> <p>Part 1 of the book, \"Beware of the Greeks: From Antiquity to Rediscovery,\" contains chapters by Evangelos Sakkas, Constantine Theodoridis, Ioannis Zelepos, Tatiana Triantafyllidou, and Alexis Dassios. What unites them is their emphasis on how other cultures—British, German, and Russian, for example—understood the Greek genius during the Early Modern period. A focus on the Greek <em>daimonion</em> resulted from two encounters: one was the classicizing imperative that accompanied the West's \"discovery\" of ancient Greece, and the other was the actual interaction between Greek and Western merchants and travelers. As Westerners increasingly imagined themselves as descendants of an idealized ancient Greek culture, they simultaneously had to craft an understanding of who the contemporary Greeks were. On the one hand, these Greeks demonstrated many characteristics exemplified by Homer's Odysseus—clever, ingenious, shrewd, freedom-loving, and skilled in the marketplace. On the other hand, many of the actual Greeks Westerners encountered from day to day were more akin to Virgil's Sinon—cunning, immoral, sly, deceitful, subservient, and corrupt. These two perspectives created a Janus-like stereotype of Greeks, with foreigners generally focusing on the negative, darker version of the Greek genius trope, especially where merchants and businessmen were concerned. Meanwhile, as Greeks themselves internalized the genius concept, they also created two contrasting identities, one as Hellenes and the other as <em>Romaioi</em>.</p> <p>Sakkas's chapter, \"Greek Subtlety and Ingenuity,\" explores the historical evolution, in Early Modern Europe, of an ancient stereotype depicting Greeks as eloquent fraudsters. Originating from the Virgilian character Sinon, this Latin trope resurfaced during the Renaissance, cautioning against the dangers of rhetoric. As interest in Greek texts grew, however, the concept of genius was transformed, becoming associated with the subtlety inherent in using the Greek language in the arts and theology. The classical Greeks' celebrated linguistic ingenuity created a dilemma for their descendants, who were judged against historical standards and...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43810,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2024.a925798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Rethinking Greek Genius:Reflections on Demon Entrepreneurs1
  • Thomas W. Gallant (bio)

This fascinating collection of essays examines "Greek genius" from various angles and interpretive stances. The concept is rooted in two stereotypes: the resourceful and clever Odysseus from Homer's epics and the deceitful Sinon from Virgil's works. Collectively, the essays argue that the Greek genius is closely tied to economic success, with shipping and commerce playing a crucial role in spreading Enlightenment ideas and fostering political emancipation in Greek lands. The argument suggests a reciprocal relationship between economic success and education, with each reinforcing the other. The volume also emphasizes the persistence of the Greek genius stereotype as a myth of redemption despite Greece's limited resources and uncertain prospects. Nations have traditionally crafted self-images of their character that define them and distinguish them from others. British reserve and stalwartness, for example, are captured in the phrase "stiff upper lip." Americans have crafted a self-conception around concepts such as "rugged individualism" and "the self-made man." For Greeks, the equivalent is the idea of the Greek genius, and this richly textured collection explores the content and impact of the concept on the political, social, and economic levels. It contributes to the broader discussion surrounding the history of Greek identity, particularly its complex interplay with cultural stereotypes, economic factors, and education.

In addition to discussing the structure and content of the volume, Gounaris, in his introduction, grapples with the thorny issue of what constitutes the "Greek genius" and how the phrase's meaning has changed over the ages. Translating Ἑλληνικὸν δαιμόνιον from ancient Greek to modern English is a challenging task because it was polyvalent and context-dependent. Gounaris argues that, in ancient Greek, both daimon and daimonion signify "god" or "deity." In modern Greek, they are likewise synonymous and encompass religious and [End Page 95] divine connotations as well as exceptional ingenuity in the broader sense of logical and emotional intelligence. Despite the nineteenth-century business opportunities available to diaspora Greeks, the acquired feature of ingenuity in the Greek temperament has been largely overlooked. The Greek character, with its various talents such as shrewdness and cunning, has been well studied, but there has been a tendency to neglect the (re)fashioning of the Greek genius as a constructed trait rather than an inherent one.

Part 1 of the book, "Beware of the Greeks: From Antiquity to Rediscovery," contains chapters by Evangelos Sakkas, Constantine Theodoridis, Ioannis Zelepos, Tatiana Triantafyllidou, and Alexis Dassios. What unites them is their emphasis on how other cultures—British, German, and Russian, for example—understood the Greek genius during the Early Modern period. A focus on the Greek daimonion resulted from two encounters: one was the classicizing imperative that accompanied the West's "discovery" of ancient Greece, and the other was the actual interaction between Greek and Western merchants and travelers. As Westerners increasingly imagined themselves as descendants of an idealized ancient Greek culture, they simultaneously had to craft an understanding of who the contemporary Greeks were. On the one hand, these Greeks demonstrated many characteristics exemplified by Homer's Odysseus—clever, ingenious, shrewd, freedom-loving, and skilled in the marketplace. On the other hand, many of the actual Greeks Westerners encountered from day to day were more akin to Virgil's Sinon—cunning, immoral, sly, deceitful, subservient, and corrupt. These two perspectives created a Janus-like stereotype of Greeks, with foreigners generally focusing on the negative, darker version of the Greek genius trope, especially where merchants and businessmen were concerned. Meanwhile, as Greeks themselves internalized the genius concept, they also created two contrasting identities, one as Hellenes and the other as Romaioi.

Sakkas's chapter, "Greek Subtlety and Ingenuity," explores the historical evolution, in Early Modern Europe, of an ancient stereotype depicting Greeks as eloquent fraudsters. Originating from the Virgilian character Sinon, this Latin trope resurfaced during the Renaissance, cautioning against the dangers of rhetoric. As interest in Greek texts grew, however, the concept of genius was transformed, becoming associated with the subtlety inherent in using the Greek language in the arts and theology. The classical Greeks' celebrated linguistic ingenuity created a dilemma for their descendants, who were judged against historical standards and...

反思希腊天才对恶魔企业家的思考
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 反思希腊天才:对恶魔企业家的思考1 托马斯-W-加兰特(Thomas W. Gallant)(简历) 这本引人入胜的论文集从不同角度和解释立场审视了 "希腊天才"。这一概念源于两个刻板印象:荷马史诗中足智多谋的奥德修斯和维吉尔作品中诡计多端的西农。这些文章共同认为,希腊天才与经济成功密切相关,航运和商业在传播启蒙思想和促进希腊政治解放方面发挥了至关重要的作用。文章认为,经济成功与教育之间存在互为因果的关系,两者相辅相成。本卷还强调,尽管希腊资源有限、前景不明,但希腊天才的刻板印象作为一种救赎神话依然存在。传统上,各国都会精心塑造自我形象,以确定自己的性格,并将自己与其他国家区分开来。例如,英国人的矜持和坚毅就体现在 "stiff upper lip "一词中。美国人围绕 "粗犷的个人主义 "和 "自食其力的人 "等概念建立了自我概念。这本内容丰富的文集探讨了这一概念的内容及其在政治、社会和经济层面的影响。它有助于围绕希腊人身份历史展开更广泛的讨论,尤其是希腊人身份与文化成见、经济因素和教育之间复杂的相互作用。除了讨论该书的结构和内容外,古纳里斯还在导言中探讨了 "希腊天才 "的构成要素以及这一短语的含义如何随着时代的变迁而变化这一棘手问题。将Ἑλληνικὸν δαιμόνιον从古希腊语翻译成现代英语是一项极具挑战性的任务,因为它具有多义性,而且取决于语境。Gounaris 认为,在古希腊语中,daimon 和 daimonion 都表示 "神 "或 "神性"。在现代希腊语中,这两个词同样是同义词,既包含宗教和 [第 95 页完] 神的内涵,也包含广义上的逻辑和情感智慧,即非凡的聪明才智。尽管十九世纪散居海外的希腊人获得了很多商业机会,但希腊人性情中后天形成的聪明才智却在很大程度上被忽视了。希腊人的性格中蕴含着精明和狡猾等各种天赋,这一点已经得到了很好的研究,但人们倾向于忽视希腊天才的(再)塑造,将其视为一种建构的特质,而非与生俱来的特质。本书第一部分 "警惕希腊人:从古代到再发现",包含了伊万杰洛斯-萨克斯卡斯(Evangelos Sakkas)、康斯坦丁-西奥多里迪斯(Constantine Theodoridis)、伊奥尼斯-泽勒波斯(Ioannis Zelepos)、塔蒂亚娜-特里安塔菲利杜(Tatiana Triantafyllidou)和亚历克西斯-达西奥斯(Alexis Dassios)的章节。他们的共同点是强调其他文化--例如英国、德国和俄罗斯--如何理解早期现代时期的希腊天才。对希腊daimonion的关注源于两种遭遇:一种是西方 "发现 "古希腊时的古典化要求,另一种是希腊与西方商人和旅行者之间的实际互动。当西方人越来越多地将自己想象成理想化的古希腊文化的后裔时,他们同时也不得不精心设计对当代希腊人的理解。一方面,这些希腊人表现出荷马史诗中奥德修斯所代表的许多特征--聪明、机智、精明、热爱自由、精通市场。另一方面,西方人日常接触到的许多真实的希腊人更像维吉尔笔下的西农,狡猾、不道德、狡诈、欺骗、顺从、腐败。这两种观点对希腊人形成了一种雅努斯式的刻板印象,外国人通常关注希腊天才的负面、黑暗形象,尤其是商人和生意人。与此同时,随着希腊人自己将天才概念内化,他们也创造了两种截然不同的身份,一种是希腊人,另一种是罗马人。萨卡斯的 "希腊人的精巧与独创性 "一章探讨了将希腊人描绘成能言善辩的骗子的古老刻板印象在近代早期欧洲的历史演变。这个拉丁语特例源于维吉尔笔下的人物西农,在文艺复兴时期再次出现,提醒人们警惕修辞的危险。然而,随着人们对希腊文本的兴趣与日俱增,天才的概念也发生了转变,变得与在艺术和神学中使用希腊语的精妙内在联系在一起。古典希腊人为人称道的语言独创性给他们的后代造成了两难的境地,他们既要根据历史标准来评判,又要根据自己的语言来评判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES
JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Praised as "a magnificent scholarly journal" by Choice magazine, the Journal of Modern Greek Studies is the only scholarly periodical to focus exclusively on modern Greece. The Journal publishes critical analyses of Greek social, cultural, and political affairs, covering the period from the late Byzantine Empire to the present. Contributors include internationally recognized scholars in the fields of history, literature, anthropology, political science, Byzantine studies, and modern Greece.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信