The Discursive Struggle for Digital Sovereignty: Security, Economy, Rights and the Cloud Project Gaia-X

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Kristin Anabel Eggeling
{"title":"The Discursive Struggle for Digital Sovereignty: Security, Economy, Rights and the Cloud Project Gaia-X","authors":"Rebecca Adler-Nissen,&nbsp;Kristin Anabel Eggeling","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the struggle for ‘digital sovereignty’ in the European Union (EU). A seeming contradiction – the internet, after all, spans the globe – digital sovereignty is portrayed as the winning geoeconomic formula to keep the EU secure, competitive and democratic in the digital future. Approaching digital sovereignty as a discursive claim and analysing it through a case study of the European cloud project Gaia-X, we show that there is no singular understanding of digital sovereignty in the EU. Instead, we identify six different conceptions across the domains of security, economy and rights. This article outlines three scenarios for how the digital sovereignty agenda may develop and thus shape the EU's digital policy and its relations with the rest of the world: <i>constitutional tolerance</i> (where the conceptions co-exist), <i>hegemony</i> (where one conception dominates) or <i>collapse</i> (where the agenda falls apart due to inbuilt conceptual contradictions).</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"62 4","pages":"993-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13594","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the struggle for ‘digital sovereignty’ in the European Union (EU). A seeming contradiction – the internet, after all, spans the globe – digital sovereignty is portrayed as the winning geoeconomic formula to keep the EU secure, competitive and democratic in the digital future. Approaching digital sovereignty as a discursive claim and analysing it through a case study of the European cloud project Gaia-X, we show that there is no singular understanding of digital sovereignty in the EU. Instead, we identify six different conceptions across the domains of security, economy and rights. This article outlines three scenarios for how the digital sovereignty agenda may develop and thus shape the EU's digital policy and its relations with the rest of the world: constitutional tolerance (where the conceptions co-exist), hegemony (where one conception dominates) or collapse (where the agenda falls apart due to inbuilt conceptual contradictions).

数字主权的话语斗争:安全、经济权利与云项目 Gaia-X
本文探讨了欧洲联盟(欧盟)为争取 "数字主权 "而进行的斗争。数字主权看似矛盾--毕竟互联网横跨全球--却被描绘成欧盟在数字未来保持安全、竞争力和民主的制胜法宝。我们将数字主权视为一种话语主张,并通过对欧洲云项目 Gaia-X 的案例研究对其进行分析,结果表明欧盟对数字主权的理解并不单一。相反,我们在安全、经济和权利领域发现了六种不同的概念。本文概述了数字主权议程如何发展并进而塑造欧盟数字政策及其与世界其他地区关系的三种情况:宪法宽容(各种概念共存)、霸权(一种概念占主导地位)或崩溃(议程因内在概念矛盾而分崩离析)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信