{"title":"An Oracle with no $\\mathrm{UP}$-Complete Sets, but $\\mathrm{NP}=\\mathrm{PSPACE}$","authors":"David Dingel, Fabian Egidy, Christian Glaßer","doi":"arxiv-2404.19104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We construct an oracle relative to which $\\mathrm{NP} = \\mathrm{PSPACE}$, but\n$\\mathrm{UP}$ has no many-one complete sets. This combines the properties of an\noracle by Hartmanis and Hemachandra [HH88] and one by Ogiwara and Hemachandra\n[OH93]. The oracle provides new separations of classical conjectures on optimal proof\nsystems and complete sets in promise classes. This answers several questions by\nPudl\\'ak [Pud17], e.g., the implications $\\mathsf{UP} \\Longrightarrow\n\\mathsf{CON}^{\\mathsf{N}}$ and $\\mathsf{SAT} \\Longrightarrow \\mathsf{TFNP}$ are\nfalse relative to our oracle. Moreover, the oracle demonstrates that, in principle, it is possible that\n$\\mathrm{TFNP}$-complete problems exist, while at the same time $\\mathrm{SAT}$\nhas no p-optimal proof systems.","PeriodicalId":501024,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.19104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We construct an oracle relative to which $\mathrm{NP} = \mathrm{PSPACE}$, but
$\mathrm{UP}$ has no many-one complete sets. This combines the properties of an
oracle by Hartmanis and Hemachandra [HH88] and one by Ogiwara and Hemachandra
[OH93]. The oracle provides new separations of classical conjectures on optimal proof
systems and complete sets in promise classes. This answers several questions by
Pudl\'ak [Pud17], e.g., the implications $\mathsf{UP} \Longrightarrow
\mathsf{CON}^{\mathsf{N}}$ and $\mathsf{SAT} \Longrightarrow \mathsf{TFNP}$ are
false relative to our oracle. Moreover, the oracle demonstrates that, in principle, it is possible that
$\mathrm{TFNP}$-complete problems exist, while at the same time $\mathrm{SAT}$
has no p-optimal proof systems.