Evaluation of borehole interface shear test simulations for cohesive soils under monotonic loading: A comparison of Mohr–Coulomb and hypoplasticity constitutive models

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Shen Wang , Mu’ath I. Abu Qamar , Muhannad T. Suleiman , Natasha Vermaak
{"title":"Evaluation of borehole interface shear test simulations for cohesive soils under monotonic loading: A comparison of Mohr–Coulomb and hypoplasticity constitutive models","authors":"Shen Wang ,&nbsp;Mu’ath I. Abu Qamar ,&nbsp;Muhannad T. Suleiman ,&nbsp;Natasha Vermaak","doi":"10.1016/j.finel.2024.104180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Cyclic Interface Shear Test (CIST) device was recently developed to evaluate the response of soil–structure interfaces subjected to monotonic or cyclic loading. Numerical models of the CIST have not been documented. Such simulations may be beneficial to help guide the design of experiments, interpret results, and inform the development of further experimental device modifications. In the present paper, a series of interface shear tests utilizing the CIST system on a cohesive soil under monotonic loadings were simulated using a proposed three-dimensional model in the commercial finite element analysis software ABAQUS/Standard. Comparisons of simulations with experimental results are presented for the Mohr–Coulomb and hypoplasticity models for cohesive soils. It is found that (i) the clay-based hypoplasticity model outperformed the simpler Mohr–Coulomb model in terms of predicting the interface shear stress evolution and the soil volume change and (ii) the clay-based hypoplasticity model allows for identification of trends in shear response as a function of normal confining pressures at the soil–structure interface (e.g. soil–structure interface shear zone thickness). Neither of these capabilities have previously been documented or experimentally validated for cohesive soil–structure interface simulations using clay-based hypoplasticity models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56133,"journal":{"name":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 104180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finite Elements in Analysis and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168874X2400074X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cyclic Interface Shear Test (CIST) device was recently developed to evaluate the response of soil–structure interfaces subjected to monotonic or cyclic loading. Numerical models of the CIST have not been documented. Such simulations may be beneficial to help guide the design of experiments, interpret results, and inform the development of further experimental device modifications. In the present paper, a series of interface shear tests utilizing the CIST system on a cohesive soil under monotonic loadings were simulated using a proposed three-dimensional model in the commercial finite element analysis software ABAQUS/Standard. Comparisons of simulations with experimental results are presented for the Mohr–Coulomb and hypoplasticity models for cohesive soils. It is found that (i) the clay-based hypoplasticity model outperformed the simpler Mohr–Coulomb model in terms of predicting the interface shear stress evolution and the soil volume change and (ii) the clay-based hypoplasticity model allows for identification of trends in shear response as a function of normal confining pressures at the soil–structure interface (e.g. soil–structure interface shear zone thickness). Neither of these capabilities have previously been documented or experimentally validated for cohesive soil–structure interface simulations using clay-based hypoplasticity models.

单调荷载下粘性土的钻孔界面剪切试验模拟评估:莫尔-库仑构成模型与低塑性构成模型的比较
循环界面剪切试验(CIST)装置是最近开发的,用于评估土壤-结构界面在单调或循环荷载作用下的响应。CIST 的数值模型尚未记录在案。这种模拟可能有助于指导实验设计、解释实验结果,并为进一步改进实验装置提供信息。本文在商用有限元分析软件 ABAQUS/Standard 中使用一个拟议的三维模型,模拟了在单调荷载下利用 CIST 系统对粘性土壤进行的一系列界面剪切试验。对内聚性土壤的莫尔-库仑模型和低塑性模型的模拟结果与实验结果进行了比较。结果发现:(i) 基于粘土的低塑性模型在预测界面剪应力演变和土壤体积变化方面优于较简单的莫尔-库仑模型;(ii) 基于粘土的低塑性模型可识别剪切响应作为土壤-结构界面正常约束压力函数的趋势(如土壤-结构界面剪切带厚度)。在使用基于粘土的低塑性模型模拟粘性土-结构界面时,这两种功能以前都没有记录或经过实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to provide ideas and information involving the use of the finite element method and its variants, both in scientific inquiry and in professional practice. The scope is intentionally broad, encompassing use of the finite element method in engineering as well as the pure and applied sciences. The emphasis of the journal will be the development and use of numerical procedures to solve practical problems, although contributions relating to the mathematical and theoretical foundations and computer implementation of numerical methods are likewise welcomed. Review articles presenting unbiased and comprehensive reviews of state-of-the-art topics will also be accommodated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信