Evaluation of Spectral Estimation Parameters for Direct Sampling FFT-Based Measuring Receivers

IF 2.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Marc García-Bermúdez;Jordi Solé-Lloveras;Martin Hudlička;Marco A. Azpúrua
{"title":"Evaluation of Spectral Estimation Parameters for Direct Sampling FFT-Based Measuring Receivers","authors":"Marc García-Bermúdez;Jordi Solé-Lloveras;Martin Hudlička;Marco A. Azpúrua","doi":"10.1109/OJSP.2024.3389825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard CISPR 16-1-1 defines the measuring receiver using a black-box approach and sets requirements for its accuracy and spectral properties. Traditionally, such test receivers were developed using a superheterodyne architecture. Recently, time-domain electromagnetic emission measurement systems have been built employing direct sampling instruments, mainly oscilloscopes, and relying on specific signal processing to emulate the performance of compliant instruments. In these cases, the short-time Fourier transform is used for spectral estimation, but the corresponding electromagnetic compatibility standards lack details for its correct use with respect to parameters such as windowing function, overlapping factor, and frequency interpolation. Moreover, it is unclear which combination of spectral estimation parameters is best fit for this purpose. Obtaining reliable, consistent and low uncertainty spectral estimates of electromagnetic emissions measured in time-domain needs appropriate configuration and tuning of the signal processing algorithms. This paper investigates the error in the calculated spectrum for various reference signals: multitone, chirp pulses and rectangular pulses. The analysis is carried out for each CISPR band from A to D, that is, between 9 kHz and 1 GHz. After \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$489.6\\times 10^{3}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n iterations, distributed in 1700 different digital implementations of the CISPR 16-1-1 measuring receiver, the simulations outcomes point to certain sets of parameters that showed satisfactory performance overall, being the Nutall, Kaiser, and Parzen windows with more than 75% of overlapping and using interpolation factor higher than 5, generally suitable. Calibration results are used to experimentally verify that a valid set of parameters is adequate to fulfil CISPR 16-1-1 requirements.","PeriodicalId":73300,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","volume":"5 ","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10502171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10502171/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard CISPR 16-1-1 defines the measuring receiver using a black-box approach and sets requirements for its accuracy and spectral properties. Traditionally, such test receivers were developed using a superheterodyne architecture. Recently, time-domain electromagnetic emission measurement systems have been built employing direct sampling instruments, mainly oscilloscopes, and relying on specific signal processing to emulate the performance of compliant instruments. In these cases, the short-time Fourier transform is used for spectral estimation, but the corresponding electromagnetic compatibility standards lack details for its correct use with respect to parameters such as windowing function, overlapping factor, and frequency interpolation. Moreover, it is unclear which combination of spectral estimation parameters is best fit for this purpose. Obtaining reliable, consistent and low uncertainty spectral estimates of electromagnetic emissions measured in time-domain needs appropriate configuration and tuning of the signal processing algorithms. This paper investigates the error in the calculated spectrum for various reference signals: multitone, chirp pulses and rectangular pulses. The analysis is carried out for each CISPR band from A to D, that is, between 9 kHz and 1 GHz. After $489.6\times 10^{3}$ iterations, distributed in 1700 different digital implementations of the CISPR 16-1-1 measuring receiver, the simulations outcomes point to certain sets of parameters that showed satisfactory performance overall, being the Nutall, Kaiser, and Parzen windows with more than 75% of overlapping and using interpolation factor higher than 5, generally suitable. Calibration results are used to experimentally verify that a valid set of parameters is adequate to fulfil CISPR 16-1-1 requirements.
评估基于直接采样 FFT 测量接收机的频谱估计参数
CISPR 16-1-1 标准采用黑盒方法定义了测量接收机,并对其精度和频谱特性提出了要求。传统上,此类测试接收器采用超外差结构。最近,时域电磁辐射测量系统的建立采用了直接采样仪器,主要是示波器,并依靠特定的信号处理来模拟兼容仪器的性能。在这些情况下,短时傅里叶变换被用于频谱估计,但相应的电磁兼容性标准缺乏关于正确使用短时傅里叶变换的详细信息,如窗口函数、重叠因子和频率插值等参数。此外,还不清楚哪种频谱估计参数组合最适合这一目的。要获得可靠、一致和低不确定性的时域电磁辐射频谱估计值,需要对信号处理算法进行适当的配置和调整。本文研究了多音、啁啾脉冲和矩形脉冲等各种参考信号的频谱计算误差。分析针对从 A 到 D 的每个 CISPR 频段,即 9 kHz 到 1 GHz。经过 489.6 次 10^{3}$ 的迭代(分布在 1700 个不同的 CISPR 16-1-1 测量接收器的数字实现中),模拟结果表明某些参数集显示出令人满意的整体性能,其中 Nutall、Kaiser 和 Parzen 窗口的重叠率超过 75%,且使用的插值因子大于 5,通常是合适的。校准结果用于实验验证有效参数集是否足以满足 CISPR 16-1-1 的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信