Are there interactions between the urban and rural construction land use transition? Evidence from Jiangsu province in China

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Xin Li , Xiaofu Kuang , Xiaodong Ma , Chuangchang Li
{"title":"Are there interactions between the urban and rural construction land use transition? Evidence from Jiangsu province in China","authors":"Xin Li ,&nbsp;Xiaofu Kuang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Ma ,&nbsp;Chuangchang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interactive feedback between the transition of urban construction land (UCL) and rural construction land (RCL) lies at the forefront of land use transition (LUT) research, and can shape the intrinsic driving forces for land system sustainable transition and urban-rural integrated development. This study innovatively investigated the interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transition. First, a theoretical analytical framework was proposed. Second, a spatial simultaneous equation model (SSEM) was employed to examine the interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transitions in Jiangsu Province, China, from 2000 to 2020. The main findings were as follows: The interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transitions followed two paths. The first interactive feedback path was driven by the interaction of urban and rural factors, whereas the second was driven by the integrated management of urban and rural land. UCL and RCL transition witnessed a positive interactive feedback relation. Specifically, a 1% increase in UCL transition led to a 0.535% increase in RCL transition, and a 1% increase in RCL transition resulted in a 0.579% increase in UCL transition. The two aspects exhibited complex spatial interaction effects. The UCL transition in the subject city had positive and negative effects on the UCL and RCL transitions of neighboring cities, respectively. The RCL transition had positive effect on the RCL transition in neighboring cities. The key to regulation is to make the mutual feedback pathways unobstructed through innovative policies in terms of both direct and indirect regulation. This study contributes to advance research on LUT and provides scientific evidence for urban–rural integrated development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 103092"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524000924","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interactive feedback between the transition of urban construction land (UCL) and rural construction land (RCL) lies at the forefront of land use transition (LUT) research, and can shape the intrinsic driving forces for land system sustainable transition and urban-rural integrated development. This study innovatively investigated the interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transition. First, a theoretical analytical framework was proposed. Second, a spatial simultaneous equation model (SSEM) was employed to examine the interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transitions in Jiangsu Province, China, from 2000 to 2020. The main findings were as follows: The interactive feedback between UCL and RCL transitions followed two paths. The first interactive feedback path was driven by the interaction of urban and rural factors, whereas the second was driven by the integrated management of urban and rural land. UCL and RCL transition witnessed a positive interactive feedback relation. Specifically, a 1% increase in UCL transition led to a 0.535% increase in RCL transition, and a 1% increase in RCL transition resulted in a 0.579% increase in UCL transition. The two aspects exhibited complex spatial interaction effects. The UCL transition in the subject city had positive and negative effects on the UCL and RCL transitions of neighboring cities, respectively. The RCL transition had positive effect on the RCL transition in neighboring cities. The key to regulation is to make the mutual feedback pathways unobstructed through innovative policies in terms of both direct and indirect regulation. This study contributes to advance research on LUT and provides scientific evidence for urban–rural integrated development.

城乡建设用地转型之间是否存在相互作用?来自中国江苏省的证据
城市建设用地(UCL)转型与农村建设用地(RCL)转型之间的互动反馈是土地利用转型(LUT)研究的前沿问题,能够形成土地系统可持续转型和城乡一体化发展的内在驱动力。本研究创新性地探讨了城市建设用地转型与农村建设用地转型之间的互动反馈。首先,提出了一个理论分析框架。其次,运用空间同步方程模型(SSEM)研究了 2000-2020 年中国江苏省土地系统可持续转型与城乡一体化转型之间的互动反馈。主要研究结果如下:UCL 和 RCL 过渡之间的互动反馈遵循两条路径。第一条互动反馈路径由城市和农村因素的相互作用驱动,而第二条则由城市和农村土地的综合管理驱动。城市综合开发和农村土地综合利用的过渡呈现出正向互动反馈关系。具体而言,UCL 过渡增加 1%,RCL 过渡增加 0.535%;RCL 过渡增加 1%,UCL 过渡增加 0.579%。这两个方面表现出复杂的空间交互效应。研究对象城市的 UCL 过渡分别对邻近城市的 UCL 和 RCL 过渡产生正效应和负效应。RCL 过渡对邻近城市的 RCL 过渡有积极影响。调控的关键在于通过直接调控和间接调控两方面的创新政策,使相互反馈的途径畅通无阻。本研究有助于推进 LUT 研究,为城乡一体化发展提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信