Early and Late Complications of Mandibulectomy Free Flap Reconstruction: Does the Selective Use of Soft Tissue Only Flaps Reduce Complications?

Dylan B. McBee, Michael J. DiLeo, Caroline C. Keehn, Andrew T. Huang, Angela D. Haskins, David J. Hernandez
{"title":"Early and Late Complications of Mandibulectomy Free Flap Reconstruction: Does the Selective Use of Soft Tissue Only Flaps Reduce Complications?","authors":"Dylan B. McBee, Michael J. DiLeo, Caroline C. Keehn, Andrew T. Huang, Angela D. Haskins, David J. Hernandez","doi":"10.1177/00034894241250177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:This study aims to evaluate the factors most associated with early and late complications following microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) after mandibulectomy.Methods:A retrospective review of patients undergoing MVFTT after segmental mandibulectomy from September 2016 to February 2021 was performed across a single academic institution. Surgical variables were collected, including the location of the resultant mandibular defect (anterior vs posterior) and flap type (osseous or non-osseous). The primary outcome variables included postoperative complications (early, <90 days; and late, >90 days) and the patients’ functional status (return to oral intake). Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fischer’s exact test, and 2-sample t tests were used to analyze differences among variables.Results:We analyzed a cohort of 114 consecutive patients with mandibular defects, comprising 57 anterior and 57 posterior defects. Bony free flaps with hardware were used to reconstruct 98% of anterior defects compared to 58% of posterior defects ( P < .001). All soft tissue only flaps did not utilize any hardware during the reconstruction. Anterior defects demonstrated more late complications requiring additional surgery (30% vs 9%, P = .04). A secondary analysis of posterior mandibular reconstructions compared soft tissue only flaps and bony free flaps with hardware and showed equivalent rates of early (12% vs 13%, P > .99) and late (9% vs 8%, P > .99) complications requiring additional surgery while demonstrating a similar return to full oral competence (55% vs 46%, P = .52) and recovery of a 100% oral diet (67% vs 54%, P = .53).Conclusion:Osseous free tissue transfer for segmental mandibular defects remains the gold standard in reconstruction. In our patient cohort, anterior mandibular defects are associated with greater late (>90 day) complications requiring additional surgery. Comparable outcomes may be achieved with soft tissue only versus osseous free flap reconstruction of posterior mandibular defects.","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241250177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:This study aims to evaluate the factors most associated with early and late complications following microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) after mandibulectomy.Methods:A retrospective review of patients undergoing MVFTT after segmental mandibulectomy from September 2016 to February 2021 was performed across a single academic institution. Surgical variables were collected, including the location of the resultant mandibular defect (anterior vs posterior) and flap type (osseous or non-osseous). The primary outcome variables included postoperative complications (early, <90 days; and late, >90 days) and the patients’ functional status (return to oral intake). Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fischer’s exact test, and 2-sample t tests were used to analyze differences among variables.Results:We analyzed a cohort of 114 consecutive patients with mandibular defects, comprising 57 anterior and 57 posterior defects. Bony free flaps with hardware were used to reconstruct 98% of anterior defects compared to 58% of posterior defects ( P < .001). All soft tissue only flaps did not utilize any hardware during the reconstruction. Anterior defects demonstrated more late complications requiring additional surgery (30% vs 9%, P = .04). A secondary analysis of posterior mandibular reconstructions compared soft tissue only flaps and bony free flaps with hardware and showed equivalent rates of early (12% vs 13%, P > .99) and late (9% vs 8%, P > .99) complications requiring additional surgery while demonstrating a similar return to full oral competence (55% vs 46%, P = .52) and recovery of a 100% oral diet (67% vs 54%, P = .53).Conclusion:Osseous free tissue transfer for segmental mandibular defects remains the gold standard in reconstruction. In our patient cohort, anterior mandibular defects are associated with greater late (>90 day) complications requiring additional surgery. Comparable outcomes may be achieved with soft tissue only versus osseous free flap reconstruction of posterior mandibular defects.
下颌骨切除术游离皮瓣重建的早期和晚期并发症:选择性使用软组织皮瓣能否减少并发症?
目的:本研究旨在评估下颌骨切除术后微血管游离组织转移(MVFTT)与早期和晚期并发症最相关的因素。方法:对一家学术机构在2016年9月至2021年2月期间接受下颌骨节段切除术后MVFTT的患者进行了回顾性研究。收集的手术变量包括下颌骨缺损的位置(前部与后部)和皮瓣类型(骨性或非骨性)。主要结果变量包括术后并发症(早期,90 天;晚期,90 天)和患者的功能状态(恢复口腔摄入)。我们采用了描述性统计、卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验和双样本 t 检验来分析变量之间的差异。98%的前部缺损采用带硬件的骨性游离皮瓣重建,而58%的后部缺损采用带硬件的骨性游离皮瓣重建(P <.001)。所有软组织皮瓣在重建过程中均未使用任何硬件。前部缺损需要进行额外手术的晚期并发症较多(30% vs 9%,P = .04)。对下颌骨后部重建的二次分析比较了纯软组织皮瓣和带硬件的骨性游离皮瓣,结果显示需要额外手术的早期(12% vs 13%,P = .99)和晚期(9% vs 8%,P = .99)并发症发生率相当,同时显示完全口腔能力的恢复率(55% vs 46%,P = .52)和100%口腔饮食的恢复率(67% vs 54%,P = .53)相似。结论:骨性游离组织转移治疗下颌骨节段性缺损仍是重建的金标准。在我们的患者队列中,下颌骨前部缺损的后期(90 天)并发症较多,需要进行额外手术。下颌后部缺损的软组织重建与骨性游离皮瓣重建可获得相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信