Low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture therapy for pain relief after initial archwire placement

Farzaneh Ahrari, Hooman Shafaee, Melika Haghpanahi, Erfan Bardideh
{"title":"Low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture therapy for pain relief after initial archwire placement","authors":"Farzaneh Ahrari, Hooman Shafaee, Melika Haghpanahi, Erfan Bardideh","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00526-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>Pain is among the most unpleasant experience during fixed orthodontic therapy. This study compared the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in pain reduction after initial archwire placement.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial included 60 female patients who required four premolar extractions to relieve crowding. The subjects were randomly designated into four groups of 15. After placement of the initial orthodontic archwire, patients in group 1 took ibuprofen (400 mg), whereas those in group 2 received LLLT (808 nm, 200 mW, 2 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) on both buccal and lingual sides of the teeth. In group 3 (LAT), the laser (808 nm, 200 mW, 24 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) was applied bilaterally to acupuncture points (SI 18, ST 6, LI 4, SJ 2, and SJ 5). Subjects in group 4 received placebo laser treatment. Patients were requested to record the intensity of spontaneous pain, pain while biting with anterior teeth, and pain while biting with posterior teeth at different times using a visual analogue scale (VAS).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The intensity of spontaneous and biting pain increased up to the first or second days following initial archwire placement and diminished to a negligible value by the seventh day. No significant difference was found between the study groups concerning spontaneous and biting pain at any timepoint of investigation (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>With the protocols used in the study, low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture therapy were as effective as ibuprofen and placebo laser treatment for pain reduction in orthodontic patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>IRCT, IRCT20200622047886N1. Registered 2020-06-29; https://www.irct.ir/trial/49121</p>","PeriodicalId":519217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00526-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Pain is among the most unpleasant experience during fixed orthodontic therapy. This study compared the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in pain reduction after initial archwire placement.

Methods

This randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial included 60 female patients who required four premolar extractions to relieve crowding. The subjects were randomly designated into four groups of 15. After placement of the initial orthodontic archwire, patients in group 1 took ibuprofen (400 mg), whereas those in group 2 received LLLT (808 nm, 200 mW, 2 J/cm2) on both buccal and lingual sides of the teeth. In group 3 (LAT), the laser (808 nm, 200 mW, 24 J/cm2) was applied bilaterally to acupuncture points (SI 18, ST 6, LI 4, SJ 2, and SJ 5). Subjects in group 4 received placebo laser treatment. Patients were requested to record the intensity of spontaneous pain, pain while biting with anterior teeth, and pain while biting with posterior teeth at different times using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

The intensity of spontaneous and biting pain increased up to the first or second days following initial archwire placement and diminished to a negligible value by the seventh day. No significant difference was found between the study groups concerning spontaneous and biting pain at any timepoint of investigation (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

With the protocols used in the study, low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture therapy were as effective as ibuprofen and placebo laser treatment for pain reduction in orthodontic patients.

Trial registration

IRCT, IRCT20200622047886N1. Registered 2020-06-29; https://www.irct.ir/trial/49121

Abstract Image

低强度激光疗法和激光针灸疗法缓解初次安置弓丝后的疼痛
目的疼痛是固定正畸治疗过程中最令人不愉快的经历之一。这项研究比较了低强度激光疗法(LLLT)和激光针灸疗法(LAT)对减轻初次弓丝放置后疼痛的效果。方法这项随机、平行组、单盲临床试验包括 60 名女性患者,她们需要拔除四颗前磨牙来缓解拥挤。受试者被随机分为四组,每组 15 人。在放置初始正畸弓丝后,第 1 组患者服用布洛芬(400 毫克),而第 2 组患者则在牙齿的颊侧和舌侧接受 LLLT(808 纳米,200 毫瓦,2 焦耳/平方厘米)治疗。在第 3 组(LAT)中,激光(808 纳米、200 毫瓦、24 焦耳/平方厘米)作用于双侧穴位(SI 18、ST 6、LI 4、SJ 2 和 SJ 5)。第 4 组患者接受安慰剂激光治疗。要求患者用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录不同时间的自发痛、咬前牙时的疼痛和咬后牙时的疼痛强度。结论在本研究中使用的方案下,低强度激光疗法和激光针灸疗法与布洛芬和安慰剂激光疗法对正畸患者减轻疼痛同样有效。注册时间:2020-06-29;https://www.irct.ir/trial/49121
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信