Nitrous Oxide Use for Pain in Labor, Conversion to Neuraxial Analgesia, and Birth Outcome

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Susan DeJoy CNM (ret), PhD, Candice Killeen CNM, MS, Donna Jackson-Köhlin CNM, MSN, Audrey Psaltis CNM, MSN, Alexander Knee MS
{"title":"Nitrous Oxide Use for Pain in Labor, Conversion to Neuraxial Analgesia, and Birth Outcome","authors":"Susan DeJoy CNM (ret), PhD,&nbsp;Candice Killeen CNM, MS,&nbsp;Donna Jackson-Köhlin CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Audrey Psaltis CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Alexander Knee MS","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A variety of labor pain management options is essential to patients and their care providers. Inhaled, patient controlled nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a valuable addition to these options. The purpose of this study was to examine laboring patient, newborn, and provider characteristics associated with N<sub>2</sub>O use for pain relief in labor and to examine the association between N<sub>2</sub>O, conversion to neuraxial analgesia, and cesarean birth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective observational cohort study of the first year of N<sub>2</sub>O use in one large academic medical center. Patients at least 37 weeks’ gestation who were admitted for labor with intended vaginal birth from August 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were included (N = 2605). Laboring patient and newborn factors and their relationship to N<sub>2</sub>O use were calculated as unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (RRs). Poisson regression was used to model the association between N<sub>2</sub>O use and subsequent use of neuraxial analgesia and type of birth for both nulliparous and multiparous patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 20.2% of patients used N<sub>2</sub>O during labor. Multiparous patients were 24% less likely to use N<sub>2</sub>O than nulliparous patients (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84). Use of N<sub>2</sub>O did not differ significantly between patients cared for by midwives compared with patients cared for by physicians (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00). In multivariable modeling, N<sub>2</sub>O use in multiparous patients was associated with a 17% decrease in use of neuraxial analgesia (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94). There was no association between N<sub>2</sub>O use and use of neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous patients (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06). N<sub>2</sub>O use was not associated with cesarean birth in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>N<sub>2</sub>O is an important pain management option for laboring patients and those who care for them. Study results may assist midwives, physicians, and nurses in counseling patients about analgesia options.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"69 5","pages":"647-652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A variety of labor pain management options is essential to patients and their care providers. Inhaled, patient controlled nitrous oxide (N2O) is a valuable addition to these options. The purpose of this study was to examine laboring patient, newborn, and provider characteristics associated with N2O use for pain relief in labor and to examine the association between N2O, conversion to neuraxial analgesia, and cesarean birth.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational cohort study of the first year of N2O use in one large academic medical center. Patients at least 37 weeks’ gestation who were admitted for labor with intended vaginal birth from August 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were included (N = 2605). Laboring patient and newborn factors and their relationship to N2O use were calculated as unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (RRs). Poisson regression was used to model the association between N2O use and subsequent use of neuraxial analgesia and type of birth for both nulliparous and multiparous patients.

Results

Overall, 20.2% of patients used N2O during labor. Multiparous patients were 24% less likely to use N2O than nulliparous patients (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84). Use of N2O did not differ significantly between patients cared for by midwives compared with patients cared for by physicians (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00). In multivariable modeling, N2O use in multiparous patients was associated with a 17% decrease in use of neuraxial analgesia (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94). There was no association between N2O use and use of neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous patients (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06). N2O use was not associated with cesarean birth in either group.

Discussion

N2O is an important pain management option for laboring patients and those who care for them. Study results may assist midwives, physicians, and nurses in counseling patients about analgesia options.

分娩疼痛时使用一氧化二氮、转用神经麻醉和分娩结果
引言 对于患者及其护理人员来说,多种分娩镇痛方法是必不可少的。由患者控制的吸入式一氧化二氮(N2O)是这些选择中的重要补充。本研究的目的是探讨分娩患者、新生儿和医疗服务提供者在分娩过程中使用一氧化二氮镇痛的相关特征,并探讨一氧化二氮、转用神经镇痛和剖宫产之间的关联。研究纳入了 2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间妊娠至少 37 周并打算经阴道分娩的住院分娩患者(N = 2605)。分娩患者和新生儿因素及其与一氧化二氮使用的关系被计算为未调整和调整后的相对风险(RR)。结果总体而言,20.2%的患者在分娩过程中使用了一氧化二氮。多产妇使用 N2O 的几率比单产妇低 24%(RR,0.76;95% CI,0.69-0.84)。由助产士护理的患者与由医生护理的患者在使用 N2O 方面没有明显差异(RR,0.95;95% CI,0.90-1.00)。在多变量建模中,多胎患者使用 N2O 可使神经镇痛的使用率降低 17%(RR,0.83;95% CI,0.73-0.94)。无产科病人使用一氧化二氮与使用神经镇痛之间没有关联(RR,0.99;95% CI,0.93-1.06)。讨论N2O对于分娩患者和护理人员来说是一种重要的镇痛方法。研究结果可能有助于助产士、医生和护士向患者提供有关镇痛选择的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信