I need some space: solitary nesting Adélie penguins demonstrate an alternative breeding strategy at Cape Crozier

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
A. M. Cox, D. J. Khor, M. L. Elrod, A. Lescroël, G. Ballard, A. E. Schmidt
{"title":"I need some space: solitary nesting Adélie penguins demonstrate an alternative breeding strategy at Cape Crozier","authors":"A. M. Cox, D. J. Khor, M. L. Elrod, A. Lescroël, G. Ballard, A. E. Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s00300-024-03246-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to the ‘selfish herd’ hypothesis, most seabird species breed colonially so that individuals can decrease their risk of predation by forming compact groups. However, costs and benefits associated with colonial breeding may not be evenly distributed among individuals within a colony. At Adélie penguin colonies, individuals nesting on the periphery of subcolonies (distinct groups of nests) may experience higher rates of nest predation by south polar skuas, and thus the optimal aggregation pattern for Adélie penguins may be within groups that minimize the proportion of edge nests. Nevertheless, some penguins choose to nest solitarily, at significant distances from conspecifics. We tracked 50 of these “solitary-nesting” Adélie penguins at Cape Crozier, a large colony on Ross Island, during the 2021 nesting season and compared their breeding success to individuals nesting within subcolony boundaries. We found that both solitary and subcolony nests successfully raised chicks large enough to join crèches and left unattended by adults. However, chicks from solitary nests exhibited a rate of mortality more than six times higher during the transition from nest brooding/guarding to crèche stage. In the 2022 nesting season, we found that solitary nests which had previously hosted actively breeding penguins were more likely to be re-occupied. Solitary nesting therefore appears to be a less-successful alternative to breeding within subcolonies, but enough individuals could be successful with this approach to maintain the apparently disadvantageous behavior and effectively pioneer previously unused locations, possibly including eventual new colony locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20362,"journal":{"name":"Polar Biology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-024-03246-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the ‘selfish herd’ hypothesis, most seabird species breed colonially so that individuals can decrease their risk of predation by forming compact groups. However, costs and benefits associated with colonial breeding may not be evenly distributed among individuals within a colony. At Adélie penguin colonies, individuals nesting on the periphery of subcolonies (distinct groups of nests) may experience higher rates of nest predation by south polar skuas, and thus the optimal aggregation pattern for Adélie penguins may be within groups that minimize the proportion of edge nests. Nevertheless, some penguins choose to nest solitarily, at significant distances from conspecifics. We tracked 50 of these “solitary-nesting” Adélie penguins at Cape Crozier, a large colony on Ross Island, during the 2021 nesting season and compared their breeding success to individuals nesting within subcolony boundaries. We found that both solitary and subcolony nests successfully raised chicks large enough to join crèches and left unattended by adults. However, chicks from solitary nests exhibited a rate of mortality more than six times higher during the transition from nest brooding/guarding to crèche stage. In the 2022 nesting season, we found that solitary nests which had previously hosted actively breeding penguins were more likely to be re-occupied. Solitary nesting therefore appears to be a less-successful alternative to breeding within subcolonies, but enough individuals could be successful with this approach to maintain the apparently disadvantageous behavior and effectively pioneer previously unused locations, possibly including eventual new colony locations.

Abstract Image

我需要一些空间:独自筑巢的阿德利企鹅在克罗泽角展示了另一种繁殖策略
根据 "自私的鸟群 "假说,大多数海鸟物种都进行集群繁殖,这样个体就可以通过形成紧凑的群体来降低被捕食的风险。然而,与集群繁殖相关的成本和收益可能不会在集群内的个体之间平均分配。在阿德利企鹅群落中,在亚群落(不同的巢群)外围筑巢的个体可能会遭受南极鼬更高的巢捕食率,因此阿德利企鹅的最佳聚居模式可能是在群落内尽量减少边缘巢的比例。然而,有些企鹅会选择单独筑巢,与同类保持相当远的距离。在2021年的筑巢季节,我们在罗斯岛的一个大型群落克罗泽角跟踪了50只 "独巢 "阿德利企鹅,并将它们的繁殖成功率与在亚群落边界内筑巢的个体进行了比较。我们发现,独居巢和亚群落巢都能成功哺育出足够大的雏鸟,使其能够加入育雏箱,而不需要成鸟照料。然而,单巢雏鸟在从巢中育雏/看护阶段过渡到育雏阶段期间的死亡率是单巢雏鸟的六倍多。在2022年的筑巢季节,我们发现之前曾有企鹅积极繁殖的独居巢更有可能被重新占据。因此,与在亚群内繁殖相比,单独筑巢的成功率较低,但有足够的个体可以通过这种方法成功维持这种明显不利的行为,并有效地开拓以前未使用的地点,可能包括最终的新群落地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polar Biology
Polar Biology 生物-生态学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
116
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Polar Biology publishes Original Papers, Reviews, and Short Notes and is the focal point for biologists working in polar regions. It is also of interest to scientists working in biology in general, ecology and physiology, as well as in oceanography and climatology related to polar life. Polar Biology presents results of studies in plants, animals, and micro-organisms of marine, limnic and terrestrial habitats in polar and subpolar regions of both hemispheres. Taxonomy/ Biogeography Life History Spatio-temporal Patterns in Abundance and Diversity Ecological Interactions Trophic Ecology Ecophysiology/ Biochemistry of Adaptation Biogeochemical Pathways and Cycles Ecological Models Human Impact/ Climate Change/ Conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信