A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial.
Nishita Singh, Carol Kenney, Kenneth Butcher, Brian Buck, Philip A Barber, Thalia Shoshana Field, Philip Choi, Amy Ying Xin Yu, Tim Kleinig, Ramana Appireddy, Carlos A Molina, Keith W Muir, Michael D Hill, Shelagh B Coutts
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial.","authors":"Nishita Singh, Carol Kenney, Kenneth Butcher, Brian Buck, Philip A Barber, Thalia Shoshana Field, Philip Choi, Amy Ying Xin Yu, Tim Kleinig, Ramana Appireddy, Carlos A Molina, Keith W Muir, Michael D Hill, Shelagh B Coutts","doi":"10.1177/17474930241253702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes, however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials.Design:TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) over non thrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with NIHSS <5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 hours of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial and full recanalization on follow up CT Angiogram.Conclusion:Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion.Trial Registry Name:A Randomized Controlled Trial of tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion, Registration number: NCT02398656; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02398656 .","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241253702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background:Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes, however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials.Design:TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) over non thrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with NIHSS <5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 hours of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial and full recanalization on follow up CT Angiogram.Conclusion:Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion.Trial Registry Name:A Randomized Controlled Trial of tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion, Registration number: NCT02398656; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02398656 .
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.