Brain Injury Associated Shock: An Under-Recognized and Challenging Prehospital Phenomenon

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christopher Partyka, Alexander Alexiou, John Williams, Jimmy Bliss, Matthew Miller, Ian Ferguson
{"title":"Brain Injury Associated Shock: An Under-Recognized and Challenging Prehospital Phenomenon","authors":"Christopher Partyka, Alexander Alexiou, John Williams, Jimmy Bliss, Matthew Miller, Ian Ferguson","doi":"10.1017/s1049023x24000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Objective:</span><p>Hemodynamic collapse in multi-trauma patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for prehospital clinicians. Brain injury associated shock (BIAS), likely resulting from catecholamine storm, can cause both ventricular dysfunction and vasoplegia but may present clinically in a manner similar to hemorrhagic shock. Despite different treatment strategies, few studies exist describing this phenomenon in the early post-injury phase. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the frequency of shock in isolated TBI in prehospital trauma patients and to compare their clinical characteristics to those patients with hemorrhagic shock and TBI without shock.</p><span>Methods:</span><p>All prehospital trauma patients intubated by prehospital medical teams from New South Wales Ambulance Aeromedical Operations (NSWA-AO) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 12 or less were investigated. Shock was defined as a pre-intubation systolic blood pressure under 90mmHg and the administration of blood products or vasopressors. Injuries were classified from in-hospital computed tomography (CT) reports. From this, three study groups were derived: BIAS, hemorrhagic shock, and isolated TBI without shock. Descriptive statistics were then produced for clinical and treatment variables.</p><span>Results:</span><p>Of 1,292 intubated patients, 423 had an initial GCS of 12 or less, 24 patients (5.7% of the original cohort) had shock with an isolated TBI, and 39 patients had hemorrhagic shock. The hemodynamic parameters were similar amongst these groups, including values of tachycardia, hypotension, and elevated shock index. Prehospital clinical interventions including blood transfusion and total fluids administered were also similar, suggesting they were indistinguishable to prehospital clinicians.</p><span>Conclusions:</span><p>Hemodynamic compromise in the setting of isolated severe TBI is a rare clinical entity. Current prehospital physiological data available to clinicians do not allow for easy delineation between these patients from those with hemorrhagic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x24000359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:

Hemodynamic collapse in multi-trauma patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for prehospital clinicians. Brain injury associated shock (BIAS), likely resulting from catecholamine storm, can cause both ventricular dysfunction and vasoplegia but may present clinically in a manner similar to hemorrhagic shock. Despite different treatment strategies, few studies exist describing this phenomenon in the early post-injury phase. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the frequency of shock in isolated TBI in prehospital trauma patients and to compare their clinical characteristics to those patients with hemorrhagic shock and TBI without shock.

Methods:

All prehospital trauma patients intubated by prehospital medical teams from New South Wales Ambulance Aeromedical Operations (NSWA-AO) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 12 or less were investigated. Shock was defined as a pre-intubation systolic blood pressure under 90mmHg and the administration of blood products or vasopressors. Injuries were classified from in-hospital computed tomography (CT) reports. From this, three study groups were derived: BIAS, hemorrhagic shock, and isolated TBI without shock. Descriptive statistics were then produced for clinical and treatment variables.

Results:

Of 1,292 intubated patients, 423 had an initial GCS of 12 or less, 24 patients (5.7% of the original cohort) had shock with an isolated TBI, and 39 patients had hemorrhagic shock. The hemodynamic parameters were similar amongst these groups, including values of tachycardia, hypotension, and elevated shock index. Prehospital clinical interventions including blood transfusion and total fluids administered were also similar, suggesting they were indistinguishable to prehospital clinicians.

Conclusions:

Hemodynamic compromise in the setting of isolated severe TBI is a rare clinical entity. Current prehospital physiological data available to clinicians do not allow for easy delineation between these patients from those with hemorrhagic shock.

脑损伤相关休克:一种认识不足且极具挑战性的院前现象
目的:严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的多发性创伤患者的血流动力学衰竭给院前临床医生的诊断和治疗带来了挑战。脑损伤相关休克(BIAS)可能由儿茶酚胺风暴引起,可导致心室功能障碍和血管麻痹,但临床表现与失血性休克相似。尽管治疗策略各不相同,但很少有研究对损伤后早期阶段的这种现象进行描述。这项回顾性观察研究旨在描述院前创伤患者在孤立性创伤性脑损伤中发生休克的频率,并将其临床特征与失血性休克患者和无休克的创伤性脑损伤患者进行比较。方法:对所有由新南威尔士救护航空医疗行动(NSWA-AO)院前医疗团队插管且初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)不超过12的院前创伤患者进行调查。休克的定义是插管前收缩压低于 90mmHg,以及使用了血液制品或血管加压剂。根据院内计算机断层扫描(CT)报告对受伤情况进行分类。由此得出三个研究组:BIAS、失血性休克和无休克的孤立创伤性脑损伤。结果:在 1292 名插管患者中,423 名患者的初始 GCS 为 12 或更低,24 名患者(占原始组群的 5.7%)因孤立 TBI 而休克,39 名患者因失血性休克而休克。这几组患者的血液动力学参数相似,包括心动过速、低血压和休克指数升高。院前临床干预(包括输血和输液总量)也相似,这表明院前临床医生对它们没有区别。结论:孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤时出现的血流动力学损害是一种罕见的临床现象,临床医生目前所能获得的院前生理数据并不能轻易将这些患者与失血性休克患者区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信