Safety and clinical efficacy of double posterolateral coaxial portals for endoscopic management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Rui Li , Yuan-Qiang Li , Kun-Gao He , Xiao-Li Gou , Chen-Ke Zhang , Wan Chen , Fang-Yuan Wei , Cheng-Song Yuan
{"title":"Safety and clinical efficacy of double posterolateral coaxial portals for endoscopic management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome","authors":"Rui Li ,&nbsp;Yuan-Qiang Li ,&nbsp;Kun-Gao He ,&nbsp;Xiao-Li Gou ,&nbsp;Chen-Ke Zhang ,&nbsp;Wan Chen ,&nbsp;Fang-Yuan Wei ,&nbsp;Cheng-Song Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aims to analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of using double posterolateral coaxial portals for endoscopic treatment of posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS), a procedure that has gained popularity in recent times.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six fresh foot samples were randomly selected to measure the distances of two posterolateral portals to the sural nerve in different positions (plantar flexion 10°, dorsiflexion 30°, and plantar flexion 30°) for safety evaluation. A prospective analysis was conducted on the clinical efficacy of the operative approach for endoscopic management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome, including evaluation of effectiveness and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study, the mean distances of the first and second portals to the sural nerve were measured in different ankle positions. The distances were found to be 2.26 ± 0.22 cm and 1.59 ± 0.12 cm in the plantar flexion 10° position, 2.21 ± 0.21 cm and 1.55 ± 0.12 cm in the dorsiflexion 30° position, and 2.46 ± 0.29 cm and 1.73 ± 0.19 cm in the plantar flexion 30° position, demonstrating a significant safety margin from the nerve. A total of 38 patients underwent endoscopic treatment for posterior ankle impingement syndrome using double posterolateral coaxial portals between January 2012 and December 2017. This surgical approach provided access to the subtalar joint and posterior ankle region. The patients were followed up for an average of 38.2 months (24–72 months), with a satisfaction rate of 94.7%. There were no reported complications, and significant improvements were observed in both visual analogue scale (VAS) and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) scores postoperatively. The VAS score decreased from 5.68 to 0.51 (P &lt; 0.001), while the AOFAS score increased from 71.68 to 92.34 (P &lt; 0.001), resulting in an excellent/good rate of 97.3%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of double posterolateral coaxial portals in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement syndrome offers several advantages, including improved safety, reduced risk of nerve injury, enhanced visualization of the posterior ankle and subtalar joint, favorable clinical outcomes, and minimal complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221468732400013X/pdfft?md5=0a9d56eac0506c459913cd695773c106&pid=1-s2.0-S221468732400013X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221468732400013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aims to analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of using double posterolateral coaxial portals for endoscopic treatment of posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS), a procedure that has gained popularity in recent times.

Methods

Six fresh foot samples were randomly selected to measure the distances of two posterolateral portals to the sural nerve in different positions (plantar flexion 10°, dorsiflexion 30°, and plantar flexion 30°) for safety evaluation. A prospective analysis was conducted on the clinical efficacy of the operative approach for endoscopic management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome, including evaluation of effectiveness and complications.

Results

In this study, the mean distances of the first and second portals to the sural nerve were measured in different ankle positions. The distances were found to be 2.26 ± 0.22 cm and 1.59 ± 0.12 cm in the plantar flexion 10° position, 2.21 ± 0.21 cm and 1.55 ± 0.12 cm in the dorsiflexion 30° position, and 2.46 ± 0.29 cm and 1.73 ± 0.19 cm in the plantar flexion 30° position, demonstrating a significant safety margin from the nerve. A total of 38 patients underwent endoscopic treatment for posterior ankle impingement syndrome using double posterolateral coaxial portals between January 2012 and December 2017. This surgical approach provided access to the subtalar joint and posterior ankle region. The patients were followed up for an average of 38.2 months (24–72 months), with a satisfaction rate of 94.7%. There were no reported complications, and significant improvements were observed in both visual analogue scale (VAS) and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) scores postoperatively. The VAS score decreased from 5.68 to 0.51 (P < 0.001), while the AOFAS score increased from 71.68 to 92.34 (P < 0.001), resulting in an excellent/good rate of 97.3%.

Conclusion

The use of double posterolateral coaxial portals in the treatment of posterior ankle impingement syndrome offers several advantages, including improved safety, reduced risk of nerve injury, enhanced visualization of the posterior ankle and subtalar joint, favorable clinical outcomes, and minimal complications.

内窥镜治疗后踝撞击综合征的双后外侧同轴入口的安全性和临床疗效
背景本研究旨在分析使用双后外侧同轴孔进行内窥镜治疗后踝撞击综合征(PAIS)的安全性和临床疗效。方法随机选取6只新鲜足部样本,在不同位置(跖屈10°、背屈30°和跖屈30°)测量两个后外侧孔到鞍神经的距离,以进行安全性评估。对内窥镜手术治疗后踝撞击综合征的临床疗效进行了前瞻性分析,包括对有效性和并发症的评估。结果发现,在跖屈 10° 位置时,距离分别为 2.26 ± 0.22 厘米和 1.59 ± 0.12 厘米;在背屈 30° 位置时,距离分别为 2.21 ± 0.21 厘米和 1.55 ± 0.12 厘米;在跖屈 30° 位置时,距离分别为 2.46 ± 0.29 厘米和 1.73 ± 0.19 厘米,这表明与神经的安全距离很大。2012年1月至2017年12月期间,共有38名患者接受了使用双后外侧同轴切口的后踝撞击综合征内窥镜治疗。这种手术方法可进入距下关节和后踝区域。对患者进行了平均 38.2 个月(24-72 个月)的随访,满意率为 94.7%。没有并发症报告,术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)和美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS)均有明显改善。VAS评分从5.68分降至0.51分(P< 0.001),而AOFAS评分从71.68分升至92.34分(P< 0.001),优秀/良好率为97.3%。结论使用双后外侧同轴门户治疗后踝撞击综合征具有多项优势,包括提高安全性、降低神经损伤风险、增强后踝和距下关节的可视性、良好的临床效果以及并发症极少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信