Asynchronous opinion dynamics in social networks

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
{"title":"Asynchronous opinion dynamics in social networks","authors":"Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand","doi":"10.1007/s00446-024-00467-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. A prominent model to study opinion formation processes is due to Hegselmann and Krause. It has the distinguishing feature that stable states do not necessarily show consensus, i.e., the population of agents might not agree on the same opinion. We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann–Krause model. There are <i>n</i> agents, which are connected by a social network. Their opinions evolve in an iterative, asynchronous process, in which agents are activated one after another at random. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion (where similarity of opinions is defined using a parameter <span>\\(\\varepsilon \\)</span>). Thus, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. We show that such opinion dynamics are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of <span>\\({\\text {O}}(n|E|^2 (\\varepsilon /\\delta )^2)\\)</span> on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence to a stable state, where <span>\\(|E|\\)</span> is the number of edges of the social network, and <span>\\(\\delta \\)</span> is a parameter of the stability concept. For the complete social network we show a bound of <span>\\({\\text {O}}(n^3(n^2 + (\\varepsilon /\\delta )^2))\\)</span> that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of <span>\\({\\text {O}}(n^9 (\\varepsilon /\\delta )^2)\\)</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50569,"journal":{"name":"Distributed Computing","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-024-00467-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. A prominent model to study opinion formation processes is due to Hegselmann and Krause. It has the distinguishing feature that stable states do not necessarily show consensus, i.e., the population of agents might not agree on the same opinion. We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann–Krause model. There are n agents, which are connected by a social network. Their opinions evolve in an iterative, asynchronous process, in which agents are activated one after another at random. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion (where similarity of opinions is defined using a parameter \(\varepsilon \)). Thus, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. We show that such opinion dynamics are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of \({\text {O}}(n|E|^2 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2)\) on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence to a stable state, where \(|E|\) is the number of edges of the social network, and \(\delta \) is a parameter of the stability concept. For the complete social network we show a bound of \({\text {O}}(n^3(n^2 + (\varepsilon /\delta )^2))\) that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of \({\text {O}}(n^9 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2)\).

Abstract Image

社交网络中的异步舆论动态
社会中的舆论传播决定着选举的命运、产品的成败以及政治或社会运动的影响。Hegselmann 和 Krause 提出了一个研究舆论形成过程的著名模型。该模型的显著特点是,稳定状态并不一定表现出共识,也就是说,群体中的代理人不一定会就同一观点达成一致。我们重点讨论海格塞曼-克劳斯模型的社会变体。有 n 个代理,它们通过一个社会网络连接在一起。它们的观点在一个迭代的、异步的过程中演变,在这个过程中,代理一个接一个地被随机激活。一个代理被激活后,会采纳其具有相似观点的邻居的平均观点(观点的相似性用参数 \(\varepsilon \)来定义)。因此,一个代理的影响邻居集可能会随着时间的推移而改变。我们证明,对于任何社交网络,这种意见动态都能保证收敛。我们为收敛到稳定状态之前的预期意见更新次数提供了一个上限({\text {O}}(n|E|^2 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2)),其中\(|E|\)是社交网络的边数,\(\delta \)是稳定性概念的参数。对于完整的社交网络,我们展示了一个界限({\text {O}}(n^3(n^2+(\varepsilon /\delta )^2)),这个界限比之前的最佳上限(\({\text {O}}(n^9 (\varepsilon /\delta )^2))有了很大的改进。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Distributed Computing
Distributed Computing 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Distributed Computing provides a forum for original and significant contributions to the theory, design, specification and implementation of distributed systems. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: design and analysis of distributed algorithms; multiprocessor and multi-core architectures and algorithms; synchronization protocols and concurrent programming; distributed operating systems and middleware; fault-tolerance, reliability and availability; architectures and protocols for communication networks and peer-to-peer systems; security in distributed computing, cryptographic protocols; mobile, sensor, and ad hoc networks; internet applications; concurrency theory; specification, semantics, verification, and testing of distributed systems. In general, only original papers will be considered. By virtue of submitting a manuscript to the journal, the authors attest that it has not been published or submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere. However, papers previously presented in conference proceedings may be submitted in enhanced form. If a paper has appeared previously, in any form, the authors must clearly indicate this and provide an account of the differences between the previously appeared form and the submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信