Polygenic scores for longitudinal prediction of incident type 2 diabetes in an ancestrally and medically diverse primary care physician network: a patient cohort study

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ravi Mandla, Philip Schroeder, Bianca Porneala, Jose C. Florez, James B. Meigs, Josep M. Mercader, Aaron Leong
{"title":"Polygenic scores for longitudinal prediction of incident type 2 diabetes in an ancestrally and medically diverse primary care physician network: a patient cohort study","authors":"Ravi Mandla, Philip Schroeder, Bianca Porneala, Jose C. Florez, James B. Meigs, Josep M. Mercader, Aaron Leong","doi":"10.1186/s13073-024-01337-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical utility of genetic information for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prediction with polygenic scores (PGS) in ancestrally diverse, real-world US healthcare systems is unclear, especially for those at low clinical phenotypic risk for T2D. We tested the association of PGS with T2D incidence in patients followed within a primary care practice network over 16 years in four hypothetical scenarios that varied by clinical data availability (N = 14,712): (1) age and sex; (2) age, sex, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and family history of T2D; (3) all variables in (2) and random glucose; and (4) all variables in (3), HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, combined in a clinical risk score (CRS). To determine whether genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk, we tested for interaction with the CRS. PGS was associated with incident T2D in all models. Adjusting for age and sex only, the Hazard Ratio (HR) per PGS standard deviation (SD) was 1.76 (95% CI 1.68, 1.84) and the HR of top 5% of PGS vs interquartile range (IQR) was 2.80 (2.39, 3.28). Adjusting for the CRS, the HR per SD was 1.48 (1.40, 1.57) and HR of the top 5% of PGS vs IQR was 2.09 (1.72, 2.55). Genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk ((PGS-CRS interaction p = 0.05; CRS below the median: HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79); CRS above the median: HR 1.45 (1.35, 1.55)). Genetic information can help identify high-risk patients even among those perceived to be low risk in a clinical evaluation.","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01337-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical utility of genetic information for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prediction with polygenic scores (PGS) in ancestrally diverse, real-world US healthcare systems is unclear, especially for those at low clinical phenotypic risk for T2D. We tested the association of PGS with T2D incidence in patients followed within a primary care practice network over 16 years in four hypothetical scenarios that varied by clinical data availability (N = 14,712): (1) age and sex; (2) age, sex, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and family history of T2D; (3) all variables in (2) and random glucose; and (4) all variables in (3), HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, combined in a clinical risk score (CRS). To determine whether genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk, we tested for interaction with the CRS. PGS was associated with incident T2D in all models. Adjusting for age and sex only, the Hazard Ratio (HR) per PGS standard deviation (SD) was 1.76 (95% CI 1.68, 1.84) and the HR of top 5% of PGS vs interquartile range (IQR) was 2.80 (2.39, 3.28). Adjusting for the CRS, the HR per SD was 1.48 (1.40, 1.57) and HR of the top 5% of PGS vs IQR was 2.09 (1.72, 2.55). Genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk ((PGS-CRS interaction p = 0.05; CRS below the median: HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79); CRS above the median: HR 1.45 (1.35, 1.55)). Genetic information can help identify high-risk patients even among those perceived to be low risk in a clinical evaluation.
用于纵向预测祖先和医学多样性初级保健医生网络中 2 型糖尿病发病率的多基因评分:一项患者队列研究
在祖先多样化、真实世界的美国医疗保健系统中,利用多基因评分(PGS)预测 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的遗传信息的临床效用尚不明确,尤其是对于那些 T2D 临床表型风险较低的患者。我们测试了在一个初级保健实践网络中,在临床数据可用性不同的四种假设情况下(N = 14,712),随访 16 年的患者中 PGS 与 T2D 发病率的关系:(1) 年龄和性别;(2) 年龄、性别、体重指数 (BMI)、收缩压和 T2D 家族史;(3) (2) 中的所有变量和随机葡萄糖;(4) (3) 中的所有变量、高密度脂蛋白、总胆固醇和甘油三酯,合并为临床风险评分 (CRS)。为了确定遗传效应是否因基线临床风险而异,我们检测了与 CRS 的交互作用。在所有模型中,PGS 都与 T2D 的发生有关。仅对年龄和性别进行调整后,每个 PGS 标准差 (SD) 的危险比 (HR) 为 1.76(95% CI 1.68,1.84),PGS 前 5%与四分位数间距 (IQR) 的 HR 为 2.80(2.39,3.28)。对 CRS 进行调整后,每 SD 的 HR 为 1.48 (1.40, 1.57),PGS 前 5% vs 四分位数间距 (IQR) 的 HR 为 2.09 (1.72, 2.55)。遗传效应因基线临床风险而异(PGS-CRS 交互作用 p = 0.05;CRS 低于中位数:HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79);CRS 高于中位数:HR 1.45 (1.35, 1.55))。即使在临床评估中被认为是低风险的患者中,基因信息也能帮助识别高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信