Application of Polyethylene Terephthalate as a Denture Base Material for Manufacturing Temporary Removable Complete Dentures

IF 1.5 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
E. A. Chizhmakov, A. S. Arutyunov, S. A. Muslov, S. A. Bochkareva, I. L. Panov, G. D. Akhmedov, D. G. Buslovich, S. V. Panin, S. D. Arutyunov
{"title":"Application of Polyethylene Terephthalate as a Denture Base Material for Manufacturing Temporary Removable Complete Dentures","authors":"E. A. Chizhmakov, A. S. Arutyunov, S. A. Muslov, S. A. Bochkareva, I. L. Panov, G. D. Akhmedov, D. G. Buslovich, S. V. Panin, S. D. Arutyunov","doi":"10.1007/s11029-024-10186-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mechanical properties of both polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polyethylene terephthate (PET) were examined in tensile and three-point bending tests, as well as their bond and interlayer shear strengths were assessed. The results obtained were employed in computer simulation of mechanical loading of temporary removable complete dentures (TRCDs). It was shown that the variations of the elastic moduli of the dental materials studied did not exceed 15.6%; the ultimate strength of PET was higher than that of PMMA by ~2.2 times in tension and by ~1.9 times in bending. Elongation at break was greater for the PET specimens than those for the PMMA ones by ~2.3 times in tension and by ~3.1 times in bending. Computer simulation has shown that when the load was applied at the angle of 90°, the tooth fractured in all cases. Stresses were much lower in the denture base concerning the critical levels. Therefore, the adhesion conditions considered did not affect the pattern of their failure, and the critical load was the same for both denture base materials. When the load was applied to canines at the angle of 45°, the critical load was below the specified level of 100 N in the PMMA denture base due to the peculiarities of TRCD design and the lower strength of PMMA. When both canines and incisors were loaded at the angle of 45°, the PET denture base could withstand the greater critical load than the PMMA one. Both mechanical tests and computer simulation results enabled to conclude that PET is the prospect denture base material for the manufacture of TRCDs and dental orthopedic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18308,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Composite Materials","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-024-10186-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanical properties of both polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polyethylene terephthate (PET) were examined in tensile and three-point bending tests, as well as their bond and interlayer shear strengths were assessed. The results obtained were employed in computer simulation of mechanical loading of temporary removable complete dentures (TRCDs). It was shown that the variations of the elastic moduli of the dental materials studied did not exceed 15.6%; the ultimate strength of PET was higher than that of PMMA by ~2.2 times in tension and by ~1.9 times in bending. Elongation at break was greater for the PET specimens than those for the PMMA ones by ~2.3 times in tension and by ~3.1 times in bending. Computer simulation has shown that when the load was applied at the angle of 90°, the tooth fractured in all cases. Stresses were much lower in the denture base concerning the critical levels. Therefore, the adhesion conditions considered did not affect the pattern of their failure, and the critical load was the same for both denture base materials. When the load was applied to canines at the angle of 45°, the critical load was below the specified level of 100 N in the PMMA denture base due to the peculiarities of TRCD design and the lower strength of PMMA. When both canines and incisors were loaded at the angle of 45°, the PET denture base could withstand the greater critical load than the PMMA one. Both mechanical tests and computer simulation results enabled to conclude that PET is the prospect denture base material for the manufacture of TRCDs and dental orthopedic treatment.

Abstract Image

聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯作为义齿基托材料在制作临时可摘全口义齿中的应用
在拉伸和三点弯曲试验中检验了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)的机械性能,并评估了它们的粘接强度和层间剪切强度。所得结果被用于临时活动全口义齿(TRCD)机械加载的计算机模拟。结果表明,所研究的牙科材料的弹性模量变化不超过 15.6%;PET 的拉伸极限强度比 PMMA 高 ~2.2 倍,弯曲极限强度比 PMMA 高 ~1.9 倍。PET 试样的断裂伸长率在拉伸时比 PMMA 试样高 ~2.3 倍,在弯曲时高 ~3.1 倍。计算机模拟显示,当负载以 90° 角施加时,所有情况下牙齿都会断裂。义齿基托的应力远低于临界水平。因此,所考虑的粘附条件并不影响其破坏模式,而且两种义齿基托材料的临界负荷是相同的。当对犬齿施加 45° 角的载荷时,由于 TRCD 设计的特殊性和 PMMA 的较低强度,PMMA 义齿基托的临界载荷低于 100 N 的规定水平。当犬齿和门齿都以 45° 角加载时,PET 义齿基托比 PMMA 义齿基托能承受更大的临界载荷。机械测试和计算机模拟结果都表明,PET 是制造 TRCD 和牙科矫形治疗的理想义齿基托材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Mechanics of Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics of Composite Materials is a peer-reviewed international journal that encourages publication of original experimental and theoretical research on the mechanical properties of composite materials and their constituents including, but not limited to: damage, failure, fatigue, and long-term strength; methods of optimum design of materials and structures; prediction of long-term properties and aging problems; nondestructive testing; mechanical aspects of technology; mechanics of nanocomposites; mechanics of biocomposites; composites in aerospace and wind-power engineering; composites in civil engineering and infrastructure and other composites applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信