The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Joanne Susan Barker
{"title":"The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled","authors":"Joanne Susan Barker","doi":"10.1108/her-12-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The Australian Government has long used its international scholarship programs as an instrument of soft power in international diplomacy. The paper examines an international scholarship program and its role in Australia’s soft power efforts during a period in recent history.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The Australia in the Asian Century White Paper of 2012 is used as a lens to reveal how the Australian Government viewed the role of international scholarship programs in international diplomacy at a specific point in the recent past, and compares it with research revealing what was contemporaneously happening with one key government-funded scholarship program.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This paper is based on a comprehensive case study of the Australian Government’s Endeavour Scholarships and Fellowships program (2004–2019). Endeavour was an ambitious and expensive merit-based program with 6,600 recipients in numerous and diffuse sub-categories. The program was complex and cumbersome and lacked clear priorities, particularly in its lack of geographic focus. It missed opportunities to connect with the political zeitgeist, largely due to opaque priorities and inadequate evaluation regimes which focused entirely on outcomes for individual recipients rather than on relationships for Australia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research draws on the first academic study of the Endeavour program. Other scholarship programs (for example Australia Awards and the New Colombo Plan) have attracted considerable scholarly interest. The Endeavour research provides an additional counterpoint for studies of Australian scholarship programs and their contribution to international diplomacy. It is timely to consider this in 2024 when Australia is putting a new focus on its investment in international scholarships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-12-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The Australian Government has long used its international scholarship programs as an instrument of soft power in international diplomacy. The paper examines an international scholarship program and its role in Australia’s soft power efforts during a period in recent history.

Design/methodology/approach

The Australia in the Asian Century White Paper of 2012 is used as a lens to reveal how the Australian Government viewed the role of international scholarship programs in international diplomacy at a specific point in the recent past, and compares it with research revealing what was contemporaneously happening with one key government-funded scholarship program.

Findings

This paper is based on a comprehensive case study of the Australian Government’s Endeavour Scholarships and Fellowships program (2004–2019). Endeavour was an ambitious and expensive merit-based program with 6,600 recipients in numerous and diffuse sub-categories. The program was complex and cumbersome and lacked clear priorities, particularly in its lack of geographic focus. It missed opportunities to connect with the political zeitgeist, largely due to opaque priorities and inadequate evaluation regimes which focused entirely on outcomes for individual recipients rather than on relationships for Australia.

Originality/value

This research draws on the first academic study of the Endeavour program. Other scholarship programs (for example Australia Awards and the New Colombo Plan) have attracted considerable scholarly interest. The Endeavour research provides an additional counterpoint for studies of Australian scholarship programs and their contribution to international diplomacy. It is timely to consider this in 2024 when Australia is putting a new focus on its investment in international scholarships.

亚洲世纪时代的奋进奖学金计划:未兑现的承诺
目的澳大利亚政府长期以来一直将其国际奖学金项目作为国际外交中的软实力工具。设计/方法/途径 本文以 2012 年《亚洲世纪中的澳大利亚》白皮书为视角,揭示了澳大利亚政府是如何看待国际奖学金项目在近代特定时期的国际外交中的作用的,并将其与揭示政府资助的一项重要奖学金项目同期情况的研究成果进行了比较。研究结果本文基于对澳大利亚政府奋进奖学金和研究金项目(2004-2019 年)的全面案例研究。奋进奖学金是一项雄心勃勃、耗资巨大的择优奖学金计划,共有 6,600 名获奖者,分属多个不同的子类别。该计划复杂繁琐,缺乏明确的优先事项,尤其是缺乏地域重点。该计划错失了与政治潮流相联系的机会,这主要是由于其优先事项不透明,且评估制度不完善,完全侧重于获奖者个人的成果而非与澳大利亚的关系。其他奖学金项目(如澳大利亚奖学金和新科伦坡计划)也引起了学术界的极大兴趣。奋进计划 "研究为有关澳大利亚奖学金计划及其对国际外交的贡献的研究提供了一个新的研究视角。2024 年,澳大利亚将把新的重点放在对国际奖学金的投资上,此时考虑这一问题恰逢其时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信