RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kodchawan Doungsong, Ned Hartfiel, John Gladman, Rowan Harwood, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
{"title":"RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Kodchawan Doungsong, Ned Hartfiel, John Gladman, Rowan Harwood, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards","doi":"10.1177/00469580241246468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regular exercise and community engagement may slow the rate of function loss for people with dementia. However, the evidence is uncertain regarding the cost-effectiveness and social return on investment (SROI) of home exercise with community referral for people with dementia. This study aimed to compare the social value generated from the in-person PrAISED program delivered before March 2020 with a blended PrAISED program delivered after March 2020. SROI methodology compared in-person and blended delivery formats of a home exercise program. Stakeholders were identified, a logic model was developed, outcomes were evidenced and valued, costs were calculated, and SROI ratios were estimated. Five relevant and material outcomes were identified: 3 outcomes for patient participants (fear of falling, health-related quality of life, and social connection); 1 outcome for carer participants (carer strain), and 1 outcome for the National Health Service (NHS) (health service resource use). Data were collected at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The in-person PrAISED program generated SROI ratios ranging from £0.58 to £2.33 for every £1 invested. In-person PrAISED patient participants gained social value from improved health-related quality of life, social connection, and less fear of falling. In-person PrAISED carer participants acquired social value from less carer strain. The NHS gained benefit from less health care service resource use. However, the blended PrAISED program generated lower SROI ratios ranging from a negative ratio to £0.08:£1. Compared with the blended program, the PrAISED in-person program generated higher SROI ratios for people with early dementia. An in-person PrAISED intervention with community referral is likely to provide better value for money than a blended one with limited community referral, despite the greater costs of the former.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15320670.","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241246468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regular exercise and community engagement may slow the rate of function loss for people with dementia. However, the evidence is uncertain regarding the cost-effectiveness and social return on investment (SROI) of home exercise with community referral for people with dementia. This study aimed to compare the social value generated from the in-person PrAISED program delivered before March 2020 with a blended PrAISED program delivered after March 2020. SROI methodology compared in-person and blended delivery formats of a home exercise program. Stakeholders were identified, a logic model was developed, outcomes were evidenced and valued, costs were calculated, and SROI ratios were estimated. Five relevant and material outcomes were identified: 3 outcomes for patient participants (fear of falling, health-related quality of life, and social connection); 1 outcome for carer participants (carer strain), and 1 outcome for the National Health Service (NHS) (health service resource use). Data were collected at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The in-person PrAISED program generated SROI ratios ranging from £0.58 to £2.33 for every £1 invested. In-person PrAISED patient participants gained social value from improved health-related quality of life, social connection, and less fear of falling. In-person PrAISED carer participants acquired social value from less carer strain. The NHS gained benefit from less health care service resource use. However, the blended PrAISED program generated lower SROI ratios ranging from a negative ratio to £0.08:£1. Compared with the blended program, the PrAISED in-person program generated higher SROI ratios for people with early dementia. An in-person PrAISED intervention with community referral is likely to provide better value for money than a blended one with limited community referral, despite the greater costs of the former.Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15320670.
基于 RCT 的早期痴呆症患者家庭锻炼计划的社会投资回报率 (SROI),比较 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的亲身参与和混合交付方式
定期锻炼和社区参与可减缓痴呆症患者功能丧失的速度。然而,有关痴呆症患者通过社区转介进行家庭锻炼的成本效益和社会投资回报率(SROI)的证据尚不确定。本研究旨在比较 2020 年 3 月前提供的面对面 PrAISED 计划与 2020 年 3 月后提供的混合式 PrAISED 计划所产生的社会价值。SROI 方法比较了家庭锻炼计划的面对面和混合交付形式。确定了利益相关者,制定了逻辑模型,证明并评估了结果,计算了成本,并估算了 SROI 比率。确定了五项相关的重要成果:患者参与者的 3 项结果(害怕跌倒、与健康相关的生活质量和社会联系);护理参与者的 1 项结果(护理人员的压力);以及国民健康服务(NHS)的 1 项结果(健康服务资源使用)。在基线和 12 个月的随访中收集了数据。亲自参与的 PrAISED 计划每投入 1 英镑就能产生 0.58 英镑到 2.33 英镑不等的 SROI 比率。亲自参与 PrAISED 计划的患者通过改善与健康相关的生活质量、社会联系以及减少对跌倒的恐惧获得了社会价值。亲自参加 PrAISED 的护理人员因减轻护理压力而获得了社会价值。国家医疗服务体系因减少了医疗服务资源的使用而受益。然而,混合式 PrAISED 项目产生的 SROI 比率较低,从负比率到 0.08 英镑:1 英镑不等。与混合式项目相比,PrAISED 面对面项目为早期痴呆症患者带来的 SROI 比率较高。带有社区转介功能的PrAISED面对面干预可能比带有有限社区转介功能的混合干预更物有所值,尽管前者的成本更高:ISRCTN 注册号:ISRCTN15320670。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信