An Investigation into Distance Measures in Cluster Analysis

Zoe Shapcott
{"title":"An Investigation into Distance Measures in Cluster Analysis","authors":"Zoe Shapcott","doi":"arxiv-2404.13664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report provides an exploration of different distance measures that can\nbe used with the $K$-means algorithm for cluster analysis. Specifically, we\ninvestigate the Mahalanobis distance, and critically assess any benefits it may\nhave over the more traditional measures of the Euclidean, Manhattan and Maximum\ndistances. We perform this by first defining the metrics, before considering\ntheir advantages and drawbacks as discussed in literature regarding this area.\nWe apply these distances, first to some simulated data and then to subsets of\nthe Dry Bean dataset [1], to explore if there is a better quality detectable\nfor one metric over the others in these cases. One of the sections is devoted\nto analysing the information obtained from ChatGPT in response to prompts\nrelating to this topic.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.13664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report provides an exploration of different distance measures that can be used with the $K$-means algorithm for cluster analysis. Specifically, we investigate the Mahalanobis distance, and critically assess any benefits it may have over the more traditional measures of the Euclidean, Manhattan and Maximum distances. We perform this by first defining the metrics, before considering their advantages and drawbacks as discussed in literature regarding this area. We apply these distances, first to some simulated data and then to subsets of the Dry Bean dataset [1], to explore if there is a better quality detectable for one metric over the others in these cases. One of the sections is devoted to analysing the information obtained from ChatGPT in response to prompts relating to this topic.
对聚类分析中的距离测量方法的研究
本报告探讨了可与 K$-means 算法一起用于聚类分析的不同距离测量方法。具体来说,我们研究了马哈拉诺比斯距离,并认真评估了它与欧几里得、曼哈顿和最大距离等传统度量方法相比可能具有的优势。我们将这些距离首先应用于一些模拟数据,然后再应用于 Dry Bean 数据集[1]的子集,以探索在这些情况下,一种度量是否比其他度量能检测出更好的质量。其中有一节专门分析了从 ChatGPT 中获取的与该主题相关的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信