Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion

David Žižek, Miha Mrak, Matevž Jan, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Maja Ivanovski, Tadej Žlahtič, Nina Kajdič, Bor Antolič, Luka Klemen, Rafael Skale, Jurij Avramovič Gregorič, Jernej Štublar, Andrej Pernat, Matjaž Šinkovec
{"title":"Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion","authors":"David Žižek, Miha Mrak, Matevž Jan, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Maja Ivanovski, Tadej Žlahtič, Nina Kajdič, Bor Antolič, Luka Klemen, Rafael Skale, Jurij Avramovič Gregorič, Jernej Štublar, Andrej Pernat, Matjaž Šinkovec","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Primary prevention patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (IRA-CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. Methods The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented VAs, and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome’s components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Results Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94; P=0.037). Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P=0.039) and the electrical storms (Log rank: P=0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P=0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P=0.151). Conclusions Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Primary prevention patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (IRA-CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. Methods The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented VAs, and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome’s components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Results Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94; P=0.037). Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P=0.039) and the electrical storms (Log rank: P=0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P=0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P=0.151). Conclusions Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.
预防性基底导管消融对缺血性心肌病和梗死相关冠状动脉慢性全闭塞患者植入式心律转复除颤器介入治疗的影响
背景 缺血性心肌病和梗死相关冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞(IRA-CTO)的一级预防患者发生植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的风险特别高。目的 评估对接受一级预防 ICD 植入术的缺血性心肌病患者采取预防性 CTO 相关基底消融策略的疗效。方法 PREVENTIVE VT 研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验,研究对象包括射血分数≤40%、无 VA 记录、有冠状动脉 CTO 相关瘢痕证据的缺血性患者。患者按 1:1 随机分配到 ICD 植入前的预防性基底消融术或仅植入 ICD 的标准疗法。主要结果是适当的 ICD 治疗或因 VAs 意外住院的综合结果。次要结果包括主要结果的组成部分、适当 ICD 治疗的发生率、心脏病住院、电风暴和心血管 (CV) 死亡率。结果 研究共纳入了 60 名患者。在平均 44.7±20.7 个月的随访期间,5 例(16.7%)接受预防性基底消融术的患者和 13 例(43.3%)仅接受 ICD 治疗的患者出现了主要结局(危险比 [HR]:0.33;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.12-0.94;P=0.037)。预防性消融组患者的适当 ICD 治疗次数(P=0.039)和电风暴次数(对数等级:P=0.01)也较少。虽然预防性消融也减少了心脏疾病的住院次数(P=0.006),但对心血管疾病的死亡率没有显著影响(P=0.151)。结论 对接受初级 ICD 植入术的患者进行冠状动脉 CTO 相关基质的预防性消融与降低适当的 ICD 治疗或因 VAs 导致的意外住院风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信