Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion
David Žižek, Miha Mrak, Matevž Jan, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Maja Ivanovski, Tadej Žlahtič, Nina Kajdič, Bor Antolič, Luka Klemen, Rafael Skale, Jurij Avramovič Gregorič, Jernej Štublar, Andrej Pernat, Matjaž Šinkovec
{"title":"Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion","authors":"David Žižek, Miha Mrak, Matevž Jan, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Maja Ivanovski, Tadej Žlahtič, Nina Kajdič, Bor Antolič, Luka Klemen, Rafael Skale, Jurij Avramovič Gregorič, Jernej Štublar, Andrej Pernat, Matjaž Šinkovec","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Primary prevention patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (IRA-CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. Methods The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented VAs, and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome’s components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Results Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94; P=0.037). Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P=0.039) and the electrical storms (Log rank: P=0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P=0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P=0.151). Conclusions Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Primary prevention patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (IRA-CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. Methods The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented VAs, and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome’s components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Results Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94; P=0.037). Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P=0.039) and the electrical storms (Log rank: P=0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P=0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P=0.151). Conclusions Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.