Implications of computer science theory for the simulation hypothesis

David H. Wolpert
{"title":"Implications of computer science theory for the simulation hypothesis","authors":"David H. Wolpert","doi":"arxiv-2404.16050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest, especially\nin the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically\nconcerns {computers} that simulate physical universes, which means that to\nproperly investigate it we need to couple computer science theory with physics.\nHere I do this by exploiting the physical Church-Turing thesis. This allows me\nto introduce a preliminary investigation of some of the computer science\ntheoretic aspects of the simulation hypothesis. In particular, building on\nKleene's second recursion theorem, I prove that it is mathematically possible\nfor us to be in a simulation that is being run on a computer \\textit{by us}. In\nsuch a case, there would be two identical instances of us; the question of\nwhich of those is ``really us'' is meaningless. I also show how Rice's theorem\nprovides some interesting impossibility results concerning simulation and\nself-simulation; briefly describe the philosophical implications of fully\nhomomorphic encryption for (self-)simulation; briefly investigate the graphical\nstructure of universes simulating universes simulating universes, among other\nissues. I end by describing some of the possible avenues for future research\nthat this preliminary investigation reveals.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.16050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest, especially in the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically concerns {computers} that simulate physical universes, which means that to properly investigate it we need to couple computer science theory with physics. Here I do this by exploiting the physical Church-Turing thesis. This allows me to introduce a preliminary investigation of some of the computer science theoretic aspects of the simulation hypothesis. In particular, building on Kleene's second recursion theorem, I prove that it is mathematically possible for us to be in a simulation that is being run on a computer \textit{by us}. In such a case, there would be two identical instances of us; the question of which of those is ``really us'' is meaningless. I also show how Rice's theorem provides some interesting impossibility results concerning simulation and self-simulation; briefly describe the philosophical implications of fully homomorphic encryption for (self-)simulation; briefly investigate the graphical structure of universes simulating universes simulating universes, among other issues. I end by describing some of the possible avenues for future research that this preliminary investigation reveals.
计算机科学理论对模拟假设的影响
模拟假说最近再次引起了人们的兴趣,尤其是物理学界和哲学界。然而,该假说特别涉及模拟物理宇宙的{计算机},这意味着我们需要将计算机科学理论与物理学结合起来才能对其进行有效研究。这使得我们能够对模拟假说的某些计算机科学理论方面进行初步研究。特别是,在克莱因第二递归定理的基础上,我证明了我们在数学上有可能置身于一个正在计算机(textit{by us})上运行的模拟中。在这种情况下,我们会有两个完全相同的实例;至于哪个是 "真正的我们",这个问题毫无意义。我还展示了赖斯的理论如何提供了一些关于模拟和自我模拟的有趣的不可能性结果;简要描述了完全同构加密对(自我)模拟的哲学意义;简要研究了模拟宇宙的宇宙模拟宇宙的图式结构等问题。最后,我将描述这项初步调查所揭示的未来研究的一些可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信