Development and Validation of a Stroke Literacy Assessment Test for Community Health Workers

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Janhavi Mallaiah, Olajide Williams, John P. Allegrante
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Stroke Literacy Assessment Test for Community Health Workers","authors":"Janhavi Mallaiah, Olajide Williams, John P. Allegrante","doi":"10.1177/10901981241245050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly being required to perform complex health care activities, especially in community cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention. However, currently, there are no psychometrically validated instruments for assessing CHW competencies in these roles. This article describes the development and validation of the stroke literacy assessment test (SLAT)—pertaining to the Life’s Simple Seven (LS7) risk factors for stroke—for evaluating CHWs’ competencies in the context of education and training programs. The SLAT was developed using an iterative instrument design protocol, followed by empirically testing the instrument in 68 CHWs from the Columbia University Institute for Training Outreach and Community Health (InTOuCH) in New York. Data collection began in March 2021 and continued through May 2021. The evaluation was based on four types of validity evidence: (a) content validation with expert reviews of items and overall domain, (b) validation on examinee response processes with cognitive interviews, (c) item validation and diagnostic analysis, and (d) validity evidence based on expected directional group differences. In addition, the internal consistency reliability of the total test scores, with the best functioning items, were evaluated. Two such iterative cycles yielded a 34-item, written structured response test that assesses the factual knowledge and application levels of cognition, and demonstrates sufficient validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α = .69) for use with CHWs specializing in stroke prevention efforts. The SLAT is a novel, valid, and reliable instrument that contributes to filling a critical gap in rigorous competency assessments for CHWs deployed in chronic disease prevention.","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241245050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly being required to perform complex health care activities, especially in community cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention. However, currently, there are no psychometrically validated instruments for assessing CHW competencies in these roles. This article describes the development and validation of the stroke literacy assessment test (SLAT)—pertaining to the Life’s Simple Seven (LS7) risk factors for stroke—for evaluating CHWs’ competencies in the context of education and training programs. The SLAT was developed using an iterative instrument design protocol, followed by empirically testing the instrument in 68 CHWs from the Columbia University Institute for Training Outreach and Community Health (InTOuCH) in New York. Data collection began in March 2021 and continued through May 2021. The evaluation was based on four types of validity evidence: (a) content validation with expert reviews of items and overall domain, (b) validation on examinee response processes with cognitive interviews, (c) item validation and diagnostic analysis, and (d) validity evidence based on expected directional group differences. In addition, the internal consistency reliability of the total test scores, with the best functioning items, were evaluated. Two such iterative cycles yielded a 34-item, written structured response test that assesses the factual knowledge and application levels of cognition, and demonstrates sufficient validity and reliability (Cronbach’s α = .69) for use with CHWs specializing in stroke prevention efforts. The SLAT is a novel, valid, and reliable instrument that contributes to filling a critical gap in rigorous competency assessments for CHWs deployed in chronic disease prevention.
为社区卫生工作人员开发和验证卒中扫盲评估测试
越来越多的社区卫生工作人员(CHWs)需要从事复杂的医疗保健活动,尤其是在社区心血管疾病和中风预防方面。然而,目前还没有经过心理测量学验证的工具来评估社区卫生工作人员在这些方面的能力。本文介绍了脑卒中知识评估测试(SLAT)的开发和验证,该测试与 "生命七要素"(LS7)中的脑卒中风险因素相关,用于评估社区保健工作者在教育和培训项目中的能力。SLAT 采用迭代式工具设计方案进行开发,随后在纽约哥伦比亚大学培训推广和社区卫生研究所 (InTOuCH) 的 68 名社区保健员中进行了实证测试。数据收集工作从 2021 年 3 月开始,一直持续到 2021 年 5 月。评估基于四种有效性证据:(a)内容验证,包括专家对项目和整体领域的审查;(b)验证受试者的认知访谈反应过程;(c)项目验证和诊断分析;以及(d)基于预期方向性群体差异的有效性证据。此外,还评估了功能最佳项目的测试总分的内部一致性可靠性。经过两次反复循环,最终得出了一个包含 34 个项目的书面结构化反应测试,该测试可评估认知的事实知识和应用水平,并具有足够的有效性和可靠性(Cronbach's α = .69),可用于专门从事中风预防工作的社区保健工作者。SLAT 是一种新颖、有效、可靠的工具,有助于填补在慢性病预防领域对 CHW 进行严格能力评估的重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信