Estimation of the efficiency of unbiased predictive risk estimator in the inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Amin Heiat, MirSattar Meshinchi Asl, Ali Nejati Kalateh, Mahmoud Mirzaei, Mohammad Rezaie
{"title":"Estimation of the efficiency of unbiased predictive risk estimator in the inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data","authors":"Amin Heiat,&nbsp;MirSattar Meshinchi Asl,&nbsp;Ali Nejati Kalateh,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mirzaei,&nbsp;Mohammad Rezaie","doi":"10.1007/s40328-024-00443-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tikhonov Regularization is the most widely used method for geophysical inversion problems. The result of previous and current research has shown that how to estimate the regularization parameter has a dramatic effect on inversion results. In the present research, conventional methods, including L-curve, Discrepancy principle, GCV, and ACB are compared with an innovative technique called Unbiased Predictive Risk Estimator (UPRE) in the inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data. For this purpose, MT2DInvMatlab is applied as the main program. It uses the Levenberg–Marquardt method as the inversion core and the ACB method to estimate the regularization parameter. Then, this program was developed in a way that it could estimate the regularization parameter using all of the above-mentioned methods. Next, a relatively complex model consisting of two layers and three blocks was used as a synthetic model. Comparing the results of all methods in TM, TE, and joint modes showed that the UPRE method, which previously provided desirable results in the inversion of potential field data in terms of convergence rate, time, and accuracy of results, here along with the ACB method, presented more acceptable results in the same indicators. Therefore, these two methods were used in a geothermal case in the North-West of Iran as a real test. In this case, the UPRE presented results at the same level as the ACB method and better than it in terms of some indicators. So, the UPRE method, especially in large-scale problems, could be a suitable alternative to the ACB method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-024-00443-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tikhonov Regularization is the most widely used method for geophysical inversion problems. The result of previous and current research has shown that how to estimate the regularization parameter has a dramatic effect on inversion results. In the present research, conventional methods, including L-curve, Discrepancy principle, GCV, and ACB are compared with an innovative technique called Unbiased Predictive Risk Estimator (UPRE) in the inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data. For this purpose, MT2DInvMatlab is applied as the main program. It uses the Levenberg–Marquardt method as the inversion core and the ACB method to estimate the regularization parameter. Then, this program was developed in a way that it could estimate the regularization parameter using all of the above-mentioned methods. Next, a relatively complex model consisting of two layers and three blocks was used as a synthetic model. Comparing the results of all methods in TM, TE, and joint modes showed that the UPRE method, which previously provided desirable results in the inversion of potential field data in terms of convergence rate, time, and accuracy of results, here along with the ACB method, presented more acceptable results in the same indicators. Therefore, these two methods were used in a geothermal case in the North-West of Iran as a real test. In this case, the UPRE presented results at the same level as the ACB method and better than it in terms of some indicators. So, the UPRE method, especially in large-scale problems, could be a suitable alternative to the ACB method.

Abstract Image

无偏预测风险估算器在二维磁突触数据反演中的效率估算
Tikhonov 正则化是地球物理反演问题中应用最广泛的方法。以往和当前的研究结果表明,如何估计正则化参数会对反演结果产生巨大影响。本研究将 L 曲线、差异原理、GCV 和 ACB 等传统方法与一种名为 "无偏预测风险估算器(UPRE)"的创新技术在二维磁触电数据反演中进行了比较。为此,MT2DInvMatlab 被用作主程序。它使用 Levenberg-Marquardt 方法作为反演核心,并使用 ACB 方法估计正则化参数。然后,开发了该程序,使其能够使用上述所有方法估算正则化参数。接下来,一个由两层三块组成的相对复杂的模型被用作合成模型。对所有方法在 TM、TE 和联合模式下的结果进行比较后发现,UPRE 方法以前在反演电位场数据时在收敛速度、时间和结果精度方面都取得了理想的结果,而在这里与 ACB 方法一起,在相同指标下取得了更可接受的结果。因此,在伊朗西北部的一个地热案例中使用了这两种方法进行实际测试。在这种情况下,UPRE 得出的结果与 ACB 方法相同,在某些指标上还优于 ACB 方法。因此,UPRE 方法,尤其是在大规模问题上,可以成为 ACB 方法的合适替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信