Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?

Elie E. Daou, Pascale Salameh
{"title":"Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?","authors":"Elie E. Daou, Pascale Salameh","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_429_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nThe objectives of the study were to compare the adaptation of presintered zirconia and cobalt- chromium prostheses using microcomputed tomography (μCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and stereomicroscope (SM).\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nTwenty-four fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were fabricated on metal abutments, duplicated from maxillary first premolar and first molar prepared on a typodont model. Teeth were reduced to obtain chamfer of 1.2 mm and reduction occlusaly of 2 mm occlusal. Scanning of the abutments was done with random assignment to two groups receiving the FDPs made from soft-milled Co-Cr (n = 12) and zirconia (n = 12). Marginal and internal gaps were assessed using three evaluation techniques (X-ray microcomputer tomography, SEM, and stereomicroscopy).\n\n\nSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED\nComparison of the results was made using Levene and analysis of variance tests (α =0.05).\n\n\nRESULTS\nIrrespective of the material tested, statistical differences were found between the measuring techniques (P = 0.001 overall); the obtained mean gaps were for CT scan (92.60 ± 13.31), for SEM (101.92 ± 23.03), and for SM (113.44 ± 14.68): the multiple comparisons between techniques found a significant difference between CT and SM (P < 0.001), and SEM and SM (P = 0.025). When materials were compared within each measuring technique, Co-Cr showed lower values compared to zirconia in SEM (P < 0.001) and Stereo (P = 0.049); similar results were found in CT.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nResults values differed with the chosen measuring technique. Co-Cr prostheses had a better fit than zirconia prostheses in SEM and Stereo. µCT showed comparable results to SEM, smaller than SM results.","PeriodicalId":519508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"586 1","pages":"201-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_429_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS The objectives of the study were to compare the adaptation of presintered zirconia and cobalt- chromium prostheses using microcomputed tomography (μCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and stereomicroscope (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were fabricated on metal abutments, duplicated from maxillary first premolar and first molar prepared on a typodont model. Teeth were reduced to obtain chamfer of 1.2 mm and reduction occlusaly of 2 mm occlusal. Scanning of the abutments was done with random assignment to two groups receiving the FDPs made from soft-milled Co-Cr (n = 12) and zirconia (n = 12). Marginal and internal gaps were assessed using three evaluation techniques (X-ray microcomputer tomography, SEM, and stereomicroscopy). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Comparison of the results was made using Levene and analysis of variance tests (α =0.05). RESULTS Irrespective of the material tested, statistical differences were found between the measuring techniques (P = 0.001 overall); the obtained mean gaps were for CT scan (92.60 ± 13.31), for SEM (101.92 ± 23.03), and for SM (113.44 ± 14.68): the multiple comparisons between techniques found a significant difference between CT and SM (P < 0.001), and SEM and SM (P = 0.025). When materials were compared within each measuring technique, Co-Cr showed lower values compared to zirconia in SEM (P < 0.001) and Stereo (P = 0.049); similar results were found in CT. CONCLUSIONS Results values differed with the chosen measuring technique. Co-Cr prostheses had a better fit than zirconia prostheses in SEM and Stereo. µCT showed comparable results to SEM, smaller than SM results.
测量技术的选择是否会影响氧化锆修复体与钴铬合金修复体的密合度比较?
材料和方法在金属基台上制作了二十四个固定义齿(FDP),这些义齿是根据在类型矫正模型上制备的上颌第一前磨牙和第一臼齿复制的。对牙齿进行缩小,以获得 1.2 毫米的倒角和 2 毫米的咬合缩小。对基台进行扫描,随机分配到两组,分别接受软磨钴铬(12 个)和氧化锆(12 个)制成的 FDP。使用三种评估技术(X 射线微计算机断层扫描、扫描电镜和体视显微镜)对边缘和内部间隙进行评估。使用的统计分析使用 Levene 和方差分析检验(α =0.05)对结果进行比较。001 总体);CT 扫描(92.60 ± 13.31)、SEM(101.92 ± 23.03)和 SM(113.44 ± 14.68)获得的平均间隙:技术之间的多重比较发现,CT 和 SM(P < 0.001)以及 SEM 和 SM(P = 0.025)之间存在显著差异。当在每种测量技术中对材料进行比较时,在 SEM(P < 0.001)和 Stereo(P = 0.049)中,钴铬合金的值低于氧化锆;在 CT 中也发现了类似的结果。在 SEM 和立体测量中,钴铬合金义齿比氧化锆义齿的贴合度更好。µCT显示的结果与SEM相当,小于SM的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信