Remineralization and Antibacterial efficacy of Ashwagandha, Maca and Ginger-based mouthwashes versus Fluoride-based mouthwash on initial enamel caries: An in-vitro study

P. M. Abd El Aziz, Raghda Kamh, Esraa El gezawy
{"title":"Remineralization and Antibacterial efficacy of Ashwagandha, Maca and Ginger-based mouthwashes versus Fluoride-based mouthwash on initial enamel caries: An in-vitro study","authors":"P. M. Abd El Aziz, Raghda Kamh, Esraa El gezawy","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.260586.2864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : Non-invasive management of non-cavitated caries lesions by the medicinal use of plant extracts is the goal of modern dentistry; this study was accomplished to assess the remineralizing and antibacterial potential of some herbals (Ashwagandha, Maca, and Ginger) in comparison to Fluoride-based mouthwash on initial enamel carious lesions. Materials and Methods : In this study, fifty extracted premolars were allocated evenly into five groups of 10 teeth each. Group A: teeth treated with 0.5% Ashwagandha-based mouthwash (n=10); Group M: teeth treated with 0.5% Maca-based mouthwash (n=10); Group G: teeth treated with 0.5% Ginger-based mouthwash (n=10); Group F: teeth treated with Fluoride-based mouthwash as a positive control group (n=10); and Group C; negative control group: teeth not exposed to any treatment and stored in artificial saliva. All teeth were evaluated using the DIAGNOdent pen® at baseline, after demineralization, and after 14 days with different remineralizing materials. The antimicrobial properties of fluoride and plant extracts against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus were quantitatively evaluated by an antimicrobial susceptibility test. The data were statistically analyzed using an ANOVA test. Results: All experimental treated groups confirmed a reduction in DIAGNOdent pen® values. Group G showed the most significant decrease (-8.3±2.16), followed by Group M (-7.3±0.82), and Group A (-7.3±1.25), then Group F (-6.5±0.53). The lowest reduction was observed in the control group (-3.60.97). The distinction between groups was statistically significant (p=0.000). All used mouthwashes had antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Herbal-based-mouthwashes of 0.5 % Ashwagandha, Maca, and Ginger are effective remineralizing agents on initial enamel carious lesions with antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.260586.2864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : Non-invasive management of non-cavitated caries lesions by the medicinal use of plant extracts is the goal of modern dentistry; this study was accomplished to assess the remineralizing and antibacterial potential of some herbals (Ashwagandha, Maca, and Ginger) in comparison to Fluoride-based mouthwash on initial enamel carious lesions. Materials and Methods : In this study, fifty extracted premolars were allocated evenly into five groups of 10 teeth each. Group A: teeth treated with 0.5% Ashwagandha-based mouthwash (n=10); Group M: teeth treated with 0.5% Maca-based mouthwash (n=10); Group G: teeth treated with 0.5% Ginger-based mouthwash (n=10); Group F: teeth treated with Fluoride-based mouthwash as a positive control group (n=10); and Group C; negative control group: teeth not exposed to any treatment and stored in artificial saliva. All teeth were evaluated using the DIAGNOdent pen® at baseline, after demineralization, and after 14 days with different remineralizing materials. The antimicrobial properties of fluoride and plant extracts against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus were quantitatively evaluated by an antimicrobial susceptibility test. The data were statistically analyzed using an ANOVA test. Results: All experimental treated groups confirmed a reduction in DIAGNOdent pen® values. Group G showed the most significant decrease (-8.3±2.16), followed by Group M (-7.3±0.82), and Group A (-7.3±1.25), then Group F (-6.5±0.53). The lowest reduction was observed in the control group (-3.60.97). The distinction between groups was statistically significant (p=0.000). All used mouthwashes had antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Herbal-based-mouthwashes of 0.5 % Ashwagandha, Maca, and Ginger are effective remineralizing agents on initial enamel carious lesions with antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
芦荟、玛咖和生姜漱口水与含氟漱口水对初期釉质龋齿的再矿化和抗菌功效:体外研究
目的:现代牙科医学的目标是通过药用植物提取物对非龋齿病变进行非侵入性治疗;本研究旨在评估一些草药(芦荟、玛咖和生姜)与含氟漱口水相比,对初始釉质龋齿病变的再矿化和抗菌潜力。材料与方法:本研究将 50 颗拔出的前臼齿平均分配为五组,每组 10 颗牙齿。A组:使用0.5%芦荟漱口水治疗的牙齿(n=10);M组:使用0.5%玛咖漱口水治疗的牙齿(n=10);G组:使用0.5%生姜漱口水治疗的牙齿(n=10);F组:使用含氟漱口水治疗的牙齿,作为阳性对照组(n=10);C组;阴性对照组:未接受任何治疗并保存在人工唾液中的牙齿。使用 DIAGNOdent pen® 对所有牙齿在基线、脱矿和使用不同再矿化材料 14 天后的情况进行评估。氟化物和植物提取物对变异链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌的抗菌特性通过抗菌敏感性测试进行了定量评估。采用方差分析检验对数据进行统计分析。结果所有实验治疗组的 DIAGNOdent pen® 值均有所下降。G 组的下降幅度最大(-8.3±2.16),其次是 M 组(-7.3±0.82)和 A 组(-7.3±1.25),然后是 F 组(-6.5±0.53)。对照组的降幅最小(-3.60.97)。组间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.000)。所有使用过的漱口水都对变异链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌有抗菌作用,但没有统计学意义上的显著差异。结论0.5 %芦荟、玛咖和生姜草本漱口水对初期釉质龋损具有有效的再矿化作用,对变异链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌具有抗菌活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信