Quantification of interstitial cells of Cajal and fibrosis during gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy and its association with clinical outcomes

Dennis Yang, M. Hasan, BahaAldeen Bani Fawwaz, Aimen Farooq, Yiyang Zhang, Hafiz M Khan, Tony S Brar, Sanmeet Singh, Artur Viana, Gurdeep Singh, Kambiz S. Kadkhodayan, Mustafa A Arain, Natalie Cosgrove, Deepanshu Jain, I. Inayat, Charanjeet Singh
{"title":"Quantification of interstitial cells of Cajal and fibrosis during gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy and its association with clinical outcomes","authors":"Dennis Yang, M. Hasan, BahaAldeen Bani Fawwaz, Aimen Farooq, Yiyang Zhang, Hafiz M Khan, Tony S Brar, Sanmeet Singh, Artur Viana, Gurdeep Singh, Kambiz S. Kadkhodayan, Mustafa A Arain, Natalie Cosgrove, Deepanshu Jain, I. Inayat, Charanjeet Singh","doi":"10.1055/a-2290-0502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and study aims Alterations to interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and collagen fibrosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroparesis. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of pyloric muscle sampling during gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) and the association between pyloric ICC density and degree of fibrosis with clinical outcomes. Patients and methods This was a single-center prospective study of gastroparetic patients who underwent G-POEM and intraprocedural pyloric muscle biopsies between January 2022 and April 2023. ICC count was estimated using CD117 stain and trichome for collagen fibrosis. Clinical response to G-POEM was defined as an improvement of ≥ 1 point on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index. Results Fifty-six patients (median age 60 years, 71.4% women) underwent G-POEM (100% technical success; 71.4% clinical response). ICC depletion (< 10/high-power field) and fibrosis were encountered in 70.4% and 75% of the cases, respectively. There was no difference in mean ICC count between G-POEM responders vs. non-responders (7±3.6 vs. 7.7±3.3; P = 0.9). There was no association between ICC density or degree of fibrosis with the etiology of gastroparesis, duration of symptoms, gastric emptying rate, or pyloric impedance planimetry. Patients who did not respond to G-POEM had a significantly higher degree of moderate/severe fibrosis when compared with those who responded (81.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.0002). Conclusions Pyloric muscle biopsies during G-POEM was feasible and safe. ICC depletion and pyloric muscle fibrosis are common in gastroparetic patients. The degree of fibrosis may be related to pyloric dysfunction and clinical response to G-POEM. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results.","PeriodicalId":508938,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"47 30","pages":"E585 - E592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2290-0502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Alterations to interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and collagen fibrosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroparesis. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of pyloric muscle sampling during gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) and the association between pyloric ICC density and degree of fibrosis with clinical outcomes. Patients and methods This was a single-center prospective study of gastroparetic patients who underwent G-POEM and intraprocedural pyloric muscle biopsies between January 2022 and April 2023. ICC count was estimated using CD117 stain and trichome for collagen fibrosis. Clinical response to G-POEM was defined as an improvement of ≥ 1 point on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index. Results Fifty-six patients (median age 60 years, 71.4% women) underwent G-POEM (100% technical success; 71.4% clinical response). ICC depletion (< 10/high-power field) and fibrosis were encountered in 70.4% and 75% of the cases, respectively. There was no difference in mean ICC count between G-POEM responders vs. non-responders (7±3.6 vs. 7.7±3.3; P = 0.9). There was no association between ICC density or degree of fibrosis with the etiology of gastroparesis, duration of symptoms, gastric emptying rate, or pyloric impedance planimetry. Patients who did not respond to G-POEM had a significantly higher degree of moderate/severe fibrosis when compared with those who responded (81.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.0002). Conclusions Pyloric muscle biopsies during G-POEM was feasible and safe. ICC depletion and pyloric muscle fibrosis are common in gastroparetic patients. The degree of fibrosis may be related to pyloric dysfunction and clinical response to G-POEM. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results.
胃经口内镜肌切开术期间卡贾尔间质细胞和纤维化的定量及其与临床结果的关系
背景和研究目的 卡贾尔间质细胞(ICC)的改变和胶原纤维化与胃瘫的发病机制有关。我们的目的是评估在胃口周内镜肌切开术(G-POEM)中进行幽门肌肉取样的可行性和安全性,以及幽门 ICC 密度和纤维化程度与临床结果之间的关联。患者和方法 这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,研究对象是2022年1月至2023年4月期间接受G-POEM和术中幽门肌肉活检的胃癌患者。采用 CD117 染色法估算 ICC 数量,并用毛状体检测胶原纤维化。对G-POEM的临床反应定义为胃痉挛卡迪纳尔症状指数改善≥1分。结果 56名患者(中位年龄60岁,71.4%为女性)接受了G-POEM(技术成功率100%;临床反应率71.4%)。分别有70.4%和75%的病例出现了ICC耗竭(< 10/高倍视野)和纤维化。G-POEM应答者与非应答者的平均ICC计数没有差异(7±3.6 vs. 7.7±3.3;P = 0.9)。ICC 密度或纤维化程度与胃瘫的病因、症状持续时间、胃排空率或幽门阻抗平面测量没有关联。与有反应的患者相比,对 G-POEM 无反应的患者的中度/重度纤维化程度明显更高(81.3% 对 25%;P = 0.0002)。结论 在 G-POEM 期间进行幽门肌肉活检是可行和安全的。ICC 消耗和幽门肌肉纤维化在胃痉挛患者中很常见。纤维化的程度可能与幽门功能障碍和对 G-POEM 的临床反应有关。还需要更多的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信