Determination of the geophysical signature of soft-clay and hard lateritic soils and the implications on geotechnical works using electrical resistivity imaging

Joseph Omeiza Alao
{"title":"Determination of the geophysical signature of soft-clay and hard lateritic soils and the implications on geotechnical works using electrical resistivity imaging","authors":"Joseph Omeiza Alao","doi":"10.1016/j.rines.2024.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the geophysical signature of subsurface is quite essential in mapping site conditions for geotechnical engineering and simulating geophysical surveys, especially in coastal areas. This article presents a comparative geophysical study of topsoil (often refer as engineering layer) of soft clay deposit and hard lateritic soil to evaluate the implications on geotechnical work using electrical resistivity imaging (ERI). The results of the 2D ERI show that the hard lateritic soil produces three distinctive geological layers with the topsoil having high apparent electrical resistivity (AER) values varying between 300 Ωm–1000 Ωm and a thickness between 2.0 m – 10.0 m. The layer between the unsaturated and saturated regions has a moderate layer AER and thickness values ranging from 100 Ωm–300 Ωm and 2.5 m–9.5 m, respectively. In contrast, the saturated (weathered) layer has a low AER value (&lt; 100Ω m), which represents the regional groundwater unit, located beneath the subsurface of a depth &gt; 6.0 m. However, the soft clay soil shows no distinctive subsurface layers, as it is characterized by a nearly homogeneity subsurface of poor AER variability. The top-soft clay deposit has very AER values ranging from 11.0 Ωm–80 Ωm, which extends beyond 6.5 m. Higher and lower AER values noted within the overburdened topsoil of lateritic and clay extractions, respectively, were due to the accumulations of compacted clay and lateritic soil, which are very essential for geotechnical works. In addition, the geophysical signal was conspicuously attenuated in soft clay soil, which shows that soft clay soil is not a favourite target of geophysical investigation. However, the geophysical signals in hard lateritic generate a fine geo-electrical layer pattern. It was also noted that the existence of soft clay and lateritic soil decreases with depth. This kind of information is very essential in geotechnical works.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101084,"journal":{"name":"Results in Earth Sciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000128/pdfft?md5=dee20aa46d27c9181d6454bcea474170&pid=1-s2.0-S2211714824000128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the geophysical signature of subsurface is quite essential in mapping site conditions for geotechnical engineering and simulating geophysical surveys, especially in coastal areas. This article presents a comparative geophysical study of topsoil (often refer as engineering layer) of soft clay deposit and hard lateritic soil to evaluate the implications on geotechnical work using electrical resistivity imaging (ERI). The results of the 2D ERI show that the hard lateritic soil produces three distinctive geological layers with the topsoil having high apparent electrical resistivity (AER) values varying between 300 Ωm–1000 Ωm and a thickness between 2.0 m – 10.0 m. The layer between the unsaturated and saturated regions has a moderate layer AER and thickness values ranging from 100 Ωm–300 Ωm and 2.5 m–9.5 m, respectively. In contrast, the saturated (weathered) layer has a low AER value (< 100Ω m), which represents the regional groundwater unit, located beneath the subsurface of a depth > 6.0 m. However, the soft clay soil shows no distinctive subsurface layers, as it is characterized by a nearly homogeneity subsurface of poor AER variability. The top-soft clay deposit has very AER values ranging from 11.0 Ωm–80 Ωm, which extends beyond 6.5 m. Higher and lower AER values noted within the overburdened topsoil of lateritic and clay extractions, respectively, were due to the accumulations of compacted clay and lateritic soil, which are very essential for geotechnical works. In addition, the geophysical signal was conspicuously attenuated in soft clay soil, which shows that soft clay soil is not a favourite target of geophysical investigation. However, the geophysical signals in hard lateritic generate a fine geo-electrical layer pattern. It was also noted that the existence of soft clay and lateritic soil decreases with depth. This kind of information is very essential in geotechnical works.

利用电阻率成像确定软粘土和硬质红土的地球物理特征及其对岩土工程的影响。
了解地下的地球物理特征对于绘制岩土工程现场条件图和模拟地球物理勘测非常重要,尤其是在沿海地区。本文利用电阻率成像(ERI)对软粘土沉积表层(通常称为工程层)和硬红土进行了地球物理比较研究,以评估其对岩土工程的影响。二维电阻率成像的结果显示,硬红土产生了三个不同的地质层,表层土壤的表观电阻率(AER)值较高,在 300 Ωm-1000 Ωm 之间,厚度在 2.0 米-10.0 米之间。介于非饱和与饱和区域之间的地层具有中等的地层 AER 值,厚度值分别为 100 Ωm-300 Ωm 和 2.5 m-9.5 m。相比之下,饱和(风化)层的 AER 值较低(100 Ω m),代表区域地下水单元,位于地下 6.0 米深处。然而,软粘土没有显示出明显的地下层,因为它的特点是近乎均质的地下层,AER 变化较小。软粘土表层的平均辐射率范围在 11.0 Ωm-80 Ωm 之间,超过 6.5 米。在红土和粘土提取物的覆土表层中分别发现了较高和较低的 AER 值,这是由于压实的粘土和红土的堆积所致,而这对于岩土工程是非常重要的。此外,地球物理信号在软粘土中明显衰减,这表明软粘土不是地球物理勘探的首选目标。不过,硬红土中的地球物理信号会产生精细的地球电层模式。研究还发现,软粘土和红土的存在随深度的增加而减少。这类信息在岩土工程中非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信