{"title":"A Laboratory Comparative Study of the Cytotoxic Effect of Bioceramic and Resin Based Root Canal Sealers","authors":"Rasha Mahfouz, Manal Abdelbaky, Mohamed Omaia","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of MTA Bioseal root canal sealer (Itena-clinical, Villepinte, France) with AH + epoxy resin-based sealer (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and ADSEAL resin sealer (Meta Biomed, Korea). Methods: In sterile test tubes, the tested sealers were consecutively diluted twice. To evaluate the proper concentration where fibroblast cells would survive, extraction media were tempered many times using cell Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) following the ISO standards. The cytotoxic effect of concentrations used in the present study (12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%) were evaluated by Methyl Thiazol Tetrazolium (MTT) essay after 24, 72 hours, and one week using a human fibroblast cell line. Statistical analysis was performed by using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: AH Plus and MTA Bioseal showed generally similar behavior. The highest cytotoxicity was recorded for both sealers at conc.100mg/ml in the first 24 hours. Afterwards the mean percentage of cell viability increased progressively with the decrease in concentration. While ADSEAL showed a nearly constant cytotoxicity that is insignificantly affected by the time factor at the four experimental concentrations used in the study. Conclusion : AH Plus had the lowest cytotoxic effect followed by MTA Bioseal. However, both sealers showed parallel behavior of decreased cytotoxicity with increasing test time period. While ADSEAL had the highest cytotoxicity with statistically insignificant effect of time intervals or concentrations.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of MTA Bioseal root canal sealer (Itena-clinical, Villepinte, France) with AH + epoxy resin-based sealer (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and ADSEAL resin sealer (Meta Biomed, Korea). Methods: In sterile test tubes, the tested sealers were consecutively diluted twice. To evaluate the proper concentration where fibroblast cells would survive, extraction media were tempered many times using cell Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) following the ISO standards. The cytotoxic effect of concentrations used in the present study (12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%) were evaluated by Methyl Thiazol Tetrazolium (MTT) essay after 24, 72 hours, and one week using a human fibroblast cell line. Statistical analysis was performed by using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: AH Plus and MTA Bioseal showed generally similar behavior. The highest cytotoxicity was recorded for both sealers at conc.100mg/ml in the first 24 hours. Afterwards the mean percentage of cell viability increased progressively with the decrease in concentration. While ADSEAL showed a nearly constant cytotoxicity that is insignificantly affected by the time factor at the four experimental concentrations used in the study. Conclusion : AH Plus had the lowest cytotoxic effect followed by MTA Bioseal. However, both sealers showed parallel behavior of decreased cytotoxicity with increasing test time period. While ADSEAL had the highest cytotoxicity with statistically insignificant effect of time intervals or concentrations.
研究目的本研究旨在评估 MTA Bioseal 根管封闭剂(Itena-clinical,法国维勒班特)与 AH + 环氧树脂基封闭剂(Dentsply Sirona,德国)和 ADSEAL 树脂封闭剂(Meta Biomed,韩国)的细胞毒性作用。方法:在无菌试管中,将测试的封闭剂连续稀释两次。为了评估成纤维细胞存活的适当浓度,按照 ISO 标准使用细胞杜氏改良鹰培养基(DMEM)对提取介质进行了多次调温。本研究中使用的浓度(12.5%、25%、50% 和 100%)的细胞毒性效果是通过甲基噻唑四唑(MTT)论文在 24 小时、72 小时和一周后使用人成纤维细胞系进行评估的。采用单向方差分析进行统计分析,然后采用 Tukey`s Post Hoc 检验进行多重比较。结果AH Plus 和 MTA Bioseal 的表现基本相似。在浓度为 100 毫克/毫升时,两种密封剂在最初 24 小时内的细胞毒性最高。之后,细胞存活率的平均百分比随着浓度的降低而逐渐增加。而 ADSEAL 的细胞毒性几乎恒定,在研究中使用的四种实验浓度下,其细胞毒性受时间因素的影响不大。结论:AH Plus 的细胞毒性效果最低,其次是 MTA Bioseal。不过,这两种封闭剂的细胞毒性都随着试验时间的延长而降低。而 ADSEAL 的细胞毒性最高,但时间间隔或浓度的影响在统计学上并不显著。