Types of Septic Cardiomyopathy: Prognosis and Influencing Factors - A Clinical Study

Nian-fang Lu, Hong-Xia Niu, An-Qi Liu, Ya-Lei Chen, Hu-Nan Liu, Pei-Hong Zhao, Jun Shao, Xiu-Ming Xi
{"title":"Types of Septic Cardiomyopathy: Prognosis and Influencing Factors - A Clinical Study","authors":"Nian-fang Lu, Hong-Xia Niu, An-Qi Liu, Ya-Lei Chen, Hu-Nan Liu, Pei-Hong Zhao, Jun Shao, Xiu-Ming Xi","doi":"10.2147/rmhp.s452803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the prognostic outcomes associated with different types of septic cardiomyopathy and analyze the factors that exert an influence on these outcomes. Methods: The data collected within 24 hours of ICU admission included cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP); SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) scores, and the proportion of vasopressor use. Based on echocardiographic outcomes, septic cardiomyopathy was categorized into left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, LV diastolic dysfunction, and right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction. Differences between the mortality and survival groups, as well as between each cardiomyopathy subgroup and the non-cardiomyopathy group were compared, to explore the influencing factors of cardiomyopathy. Results: A cohort of 184 patients were included in this study, with LV diastolic dysfunction having the highest incidence rate (43.5%). The mortality group had significantly higher SOFA scores, vasopressor use, and cTnI levels compared to the survival group; the survival group had better LV diastolic function than the mortality group ( p < 0.05 for all). In contrast to the non-cardiomyopathy group, each subgroup within the cardiomyopathy category exhibited elevated levels of cTnI. The subgroup with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction demonstrated a higher prevalence of advanced age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and an increased mortality rate; the RV systolic dysfunction subgroup had higher SOFA scores and NT-proBNP levels, and a higher mortality rate ( P < 0.05 for all); the LV systolic dysfunction subgroup had a similar mortality rate ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with advanced age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or coronary artery disease are more prone to develop LV diastolic dysfunction type of cardiomyopathy; cardiomyopathy subgroups had higher levels of cTnI. The RV systolic dysfunction cardiomyopathy subgroup had higher SOFA scores and NT-proBNP levels. The occurrence of RV systolic dysfunction in patients with sepsis significantly increased the mortality rate.","PeriodicalId":506758,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"71 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s452803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the prognostic outcomes associated with different types of septic cardiomyopathy and analyze the factors that exert an influence on these outcomes. Methods: The data collected within 24 hours of ICU admission included cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP); SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) scores, and the proportion of vasopressor use. Based on echocardiographic outcomes, septic cardiomyopathy was categorized into left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, LV diastolic dysfunction, and right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction. Differences between the mortality and survival groups, as well as between each cardiomyopathy subgroup and the non-cardiomyopathy group were compared, to explore the influencing factors of cardiomyopathy. Results: A cohort of 184 patients were included in this study, with LV diastolic dysfunction having the highest incidence rate (43.5%). The mortality group had significantly higher SOFA scores, vasopressor use, and cTnI levels compared to the survival group; the survival group had better LV diastolic function than the mortality group ( p < 0.05 for all). In contrast to the non-cardiomyopathy group, each subgroup within the cardiomyopathy category exhibited elevated levels of cTnI. The subgroup with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction demonstrated a higher prevalence of advanced age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and an increased mortality rate; the RV systolic dysfunction subgroup had higher SOFA scores and NT-proBNP levels, and a higher mortality rate ( P < 0.05 for all); the LV systolic dysfunction subgroup had a similar mortality rate ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with advanced age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or coronary artery disease are more prone to develop LV diastolic dysfunction type of cardiomyopathy; cardiomyopathy subgroups had higher levels of cTnI. The RV systolic dysfunction cardiomyopathy subgroup had higher SOFA scores and NT-proBNP levels. The occurrence of RV systolic dysfunction in patients with sepsis significantly increased the mortality rate.
化脓性心肌病的类型:预后和影响因素 - 一项临床研究
目的探讨与不同类型脓毒性心肌病相关的预后结果,并分析影响这些结果的因素。方法在重症监护室入院 24 小时内收集的数据包括心肌肌钙蛋白 I(cTnI)、N-末端前脑钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)、SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)评分和使用血管加压器的比例。根据超声心动图结果,脓毒症心肌病分为左心室收缩功能障碍、左心室舒张功能障碍和右心室收缩功能障碍。比较死亡率组和存活率组之间的差异,以及各心肌病亚组与非心肌病组之间的差异,以探讨心肌病的影响因素。研究结果本研究共纳入了 184 例患者,其中左心室舒张功能障碍的发生率最高(43.5%)。与存活组相比,死亡组的 SOFA 评分、血管加压药使用率和 cTnI 水平明显更高;存活组的左心室舒张功能优于死亡组(P < 0.05)。与非心肌病组相比,心肌病组中的每个亚组都显示出 cTnI 水平升高。左心室舒张功能障碍亚组的高龄、高血压、糖尿病、冠心病发病率较高,死亡率也较高;RV 收缩功能障碍亚组的 SOFA 评分和 NT-proBNP 水平较高,死亡率也较高(均为 P <0.05);左心室收缩功能障碍亚组的死亡率相似(P >0.05)。结论高龄、高血压、糖尿病或冠心病患者更易患左心室舒张功能障碍型心肌病;心肌病亚组的 cTnI 水平更高。RV收缩功能障碍心肌病亚组的SOFA评分和NT-proBNP水平较高。脓毒症患者出现 RV 收缩功能障碍会显著增加死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信