R. Andrajati, L. A. Kusumawardani, Isti Nurul Afifah, H. W. Risni
{"title":"Analysis of drug-related problems in ischemic stroke in-patients in one Indonesian district hospital","authors":"R. Andrajati, L. A. Kusumawardani, Isti Nurul Afifah, H. W. Risni","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.242.134139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death in Indonesia. Appropriate management, including the identification of drug-related problems (DRPs), is needed to prevent disability and death. \nObjective: This study aimed to analyse DRPs as defined by the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE). \nMethod: This was a cross-sectional research using the medical records of in-patients with ischemic stroke aged >18 years. \nResult: Out of the 115 patients examined, 51.3% were male, and the mean age was 57.85 + 10.539 years. Exactly 204 cases of DRPs and 175 causes appeared in 101 patients. A total of 58 patients experienced one-to-two problems, and 43 patients experienced more than two problems. The problems domain consists of therapeutic effectiveness (P1, 133(65.2%)), adverse effects (P2, 67(32, 84%)), and medical expenses (P3, 4(1, 96%)). The DRPs mostly involved antihypertension and antiplatelet. The most common cause was a new indication for treatment (C1.9, 51(29.14%)) and drug interactions (C8.1, 48(27.43%)). Multivariate analysis of patient characteristics showed that patients taking more than eight medications were more likely to experience more than two DRPs than those on one-to-four medications (OR 5.593; 95%, CI 1.015-30.812). \nConclusion: Most patients experienced one-to-two DRPs with the highest being a potentially suboptimal treatment. Clinical pharmacists are expected to monitor therapy, especially in polypharmacy patients.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.242.134139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death in Indonesia. Appropriate management, including the identification of drug-related problems (DRPs), is needed to prevent disability and death.
Objective: This study aimed to analyse DRPs as defined by the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE).
Method: This was a cross-sectional research using the medical records of in-patients with ischemic stroke aged >18 years.
Result: Out of the 115 patients examined, 51.3% were male, and the mean age was 57.85 + 10.539 years. Exactly 204 cases of DRPs and 175 causes appeared in 101 patients. A total of 58 patients experienced one-to-two problems, and 43 patients experienced more than two problems. The problems domain consists of therapeutic effectiveness (P1, 133(65.2%)), adverse effects (P2, 67(32, 84%)), and medical expenses (P3, 4(1, 96%)). The DRPs mostly involved antihypertension and antiplatelet. The most common cause was a new indication for treatment (C1.9, 51(29.14%)) and drug interactions (C8.1, 48(27.43%)). Multivariate analysis of patient characteristics showed that patients taking more than eight medications were more likely to experience more than two DRPs than those on one-to-four medications (OR 5.593; 95%, CI 1.015-30.812).
Conclusion: Most patients experienced one-to-two DRPs with the highest being a potentially suboptimal treatment. Clinical pharmacists are expected to monitor therapy, especially in polypharmacy patients.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.