Investment Professionals’ Preferences Regarding Income Statement Presentation

Kristian D. Allee, Devon Erickson, Adam M. Esplin, T. Yohn
{"title":"Investment Professionals’ Preferences Regarding Income Statement Presentation","authors":"Kristian D. Allee, Devon Erickson, Adam M. Esplin, T. Yohn","doi":"10.2308/jfr-2023-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The FASB continues to debate useful format and disaggregation choices of financial performance information as part of its disaggregation of income statement expenses project. Using a survey of 235 investment professionals, this study provides insight into their preferences regarding income statement presentation and standardization. Overall, we find that investment professionals are generally satisfied with the level of disclosure firms currently provide in the income statement. However, the investment professionals surveyed generally think that companies should be required to use the same labels for common lines on the income statement and that operating and nonoperating activities should be formally defined. They also generally think that GAAP should allow managers flexibility to present non-GAAP measures or subtotals on the income statement. Our study provides insights for the FASB on the views of investment professionals and for academics and financial statement users regarding the information preferences of key information intermediaries in financial markets.\n Data Availability: Data are available upon request.\n JEL Classifications: M41; M44; M45; G29.","PeriodicalId":506454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting","volume":"151 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfr-2023-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The FASB continues to debate useful format and disaggregation choices of financial performance information as part of its disaggregation of income statement expenses project. Using a survey of 235 investment professionals, this study provides insight into their preferences regarding income statement presentation and standardization. Overall, we find that investment professionals are generally satisfied with the level of disclosure firms currently provide in the income statement. However, the investment professionals surveyed generally think that companies should be required to use the same labels for common lines on the income statement and that operating and nonoperating activities should be formally defined. They also generally think that GAAP should allow managers flexibility to present non-GAAP measures or subtotals on the income statement. Our study provides insights for the FASB on the views of investment professionals and for academics and financial statement users regarding the information preferences of key information intermediaries in financial markets. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M41; M44; M45; G29.
投资专业人士对利润表列报的偏好
美国财务会计准则委员会(FASB)继续就财务业绩信息的有用格式和分类选择进行辩论,这是其损益表费用分类项目的一部分。本研究通过对 235 名投资专业人士的调查,深入了解了他们对利润表列报和标准化的偏好。总体而言,我们发现投资专业人士普遍对公司目前在利润表中的披露水平表示满意。不过,接受调查的投资专业人士普遍认为,应要求公司对利润表中的常见项目使用相同的标签,并对经营活动和非经营性活动进行正式定义。他们还普遍认为,美国通用会计准则应允许管理者灵活地在损益表上列示非美国通用会计准则的指标或小计。我们的研究为美国财务会计准则委员会了解投资专业人士的观点,为学术界和财务报表用户了解金融市场主要信息中介的信息偏好提供了启示。数据提供:数据可应要求提供。JEL 分类:M41;M44;M45;G29。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信