High-need beneficiary enrollment patterns in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.

A. Unuigbe, Inna Cintina, Julia Sheriff, Lane Koenig
{"title":"High-need beneficiary enrollment patterns in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.","authors":"A. Unuigbe, Inna Cintina, Julia Sheriff, Lane Koenig","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nHigh-need Medicare beneficiaries require elevated levels of care and coordination to manage their conditions. We evaluated the extent to which high-need beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) or traditional Medicare (TM) accountable care organizations (ACOs) relative to TM non-ACOs.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nUsing Medicare claims and MA encounter data, we identified 3 groups of high-need beneficiaries: (1) individuals younger than 65 years with a disability or end-stage kidney disease, (2) frail individuals, and (3) older individuals with major complex or multiple noncomplex chronic conditions. For comparison, we included non-high-need beneficiaries in the analysis, including those with minor complex chronic conditions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nDescriptive analysis of Medicare enrollment patterns and beneficiary characteristics of high-need and other beneficiaries between 2016 and 2019.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn 2019, high-need beneficiaries accounted for 18 million or 32% of enrollees in TM and MA, an increase of approximately 1 million since 2016, driven by growth in MA. A larger share of beneficiaries in TM ACOs was high need (38%) compared with MA (24%). Although the total count of high-need beneficiaries in TM remained stable from 2016 to 2019, ACOs saw an increase of almost 1.5 million high-need beneficiaries (39% increase), and TM non-ACOs saw a decrease of 1.9 million (23% decrease).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe found that high-need beneficiaries were more likely to be in TM non-ACOs than in MA through 2019. However, an increasing number of these beneficiaries are enrolling in MA or aligned with a TM ACO. A projected increase in the population of older adults will increase the economic burden of caring for high-need individuals.","PeriodicalId":267832,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of managed care","volume":"154 2","pages":"170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of managed care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES High-need Medicare beneficiaries require elevated levels of care and coordination to manage their conditions. We evaluated the extent to which high-need beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) or traditional Medicare (TM) accountable care organizations (ACOs) relative to TM non-ACOs. STUDY DESIGN Using Medicare claims and MA encounter data, we identified 3 groups of high-need beneficiaries: (1) individuals younger than 65 years with a disability or end-stage kidney disease, (2) frail individuals, and (3) older individuals with major complex or multiple noncomplex chronic conditions. For comparison, we included non-high-need beneficiaries in the analysis, including those with minor complex chronic conditions. METHODS Descriptive analysis of Medicare enrollment patterns and beneficiary characteristics of high-need and other beneficiaries between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS In 2019, high-need beneficiaries accounted for 18 million or 32% of enrollees in TM and MA, an increase of approximately 1 million since 2016, driven by growth in MA. A larger share of beneficiaries in TM ACOs was high need (38%) compared with MA (24%). Although the total count of high-need beneficiaries in TM remained stable from 2016 to 2019, ACOs saw an increase of almost 1.5 million high-need beneficiaries (39% increase), and TM non-ACOs saw a decrease of 1.9 million (23% decrease). CONCLUSIONS We found that high-need beneficiaries were more likely to be in TM non-ACOs than in MA through 2019. However, an increasing number of these beneficiaries are enrolling in MA or aligned with a TM ACO. A projected increase in the population of older adults will increase the economic burden of caring for high-need individuals.
医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的高需求受益人注册模式。
目标高需求医疗保险受益人需要更高水平的护理和协调来控制病情。我们评估了高需求受益人相对于非 ACO 的医疗保险优势(MA)或传统医疗保险(TM)责任护理组织(ACO)的加入程度。研究设计利用医疗保险索赔和医疗保险就诊数据,我们确定了三类高需求受益人:(1)65 岁以下患有残疾或终末期肾病的人;(2)体弱者;(3)患有主要复杂或多种非复杂慢性病的老年人。为了进行比较,我们在分析中纳入了非高需求受益人,包括患有轻微复杂慢性病的受益人。方法对 2016 年至 2019 年期间高需求受益人和其他受益人的医疗保险注册模式和受益人特征进行描述性分析。结果2019 年,高需求受益人占 TM 和 MA 注册人数的 1800 万或 32%,自 2016 年以来增加了约 100 万,这主要是受 MA 增长的推动。与 MA(24%)相比,TM ACO 中高需求受益人的比例更高(38%)。虽然 TM 中高需求受益人的总人数从 2016 年到 2019 年保持稳定,但 ACOs 中的高需求受益人增加了近 150 万(增加 39%),而 TM 非 ACOs 中的高需求受益人减少了 190 万(减少 23%)。然而,这些受益人中越来越多的人加入了 MA 或与 TM ACO 结盟。预计老年人口的增加将加重照顾高需求人群的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书