Deleuze and Guattari on the French Revolution: Problems, Universal Minority, and the Bourgeoisie

Alex Underwood
{"title":"Deleuze and Guattari on the French Revolution: Problems, Universal Minority, and the Bourgeoisie","authors":"Alex Underwood","doi":"10.1353/tae.2024.a925046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article explores Deleuze and Guattari's theory of revolution in light of their comments on the French Revolution and intersection with the work of Marx. I argue that Deleuze associates revolution with a reformulation of the \"problems\" that condition experience, something Deleuze and Guattari then complicate through their insistence that institutional practice remain subject to the unfolding of an \"indeterminate\" yet collective revolutionary identity. I argue that the most important aspect of their theory for contemporary political thought is its argument for the necessity of uniting disparate forms of political experimentation without introducing institutions grounded in general conceptions of the subject, and conclude by discussing the emphasis they place on overcoming the \"cogito of communication,\" a discursive \"subject in general\" essential to contemporary capitalist democracies.","PeriodicalId":176857,"journal":{"name":"Theory & Event","volume":"137 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory & Event","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2024.a925046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores Deleuze and Guattari's theory of revolution in light of their comments on the French Revolution and intersection with the work of Marx. I argue that Deleuze associates revolution with a reformulation of the "problems" that condition experience, something Deleuze and Guattari then complicate through their insistence that institutional practice remain subject to the unfolding of an "indeterminate" yet collective revolutionary identity. I argue that the most important aspect of their theory for contemporary political thought is its argument for the necessity of uniting disparate forms of political experimentation without introducing institutions grounded in general conceptions of the subject, and conclude by discussing the emphasis they place on overcoming the "cogito of communication," a discursive "subject in general" essential to contemporary capitalist democracies.
德勒兹和瓜塔里论法国大革命:问题、普遍少数和资产阶级
摘要:本文从德勒兹和瓜塔里对法国大革命的评论以及与马克思著作的交集出发,探讨了他们的革命理论。我认为,德勒兹将革命与重新制定制约经验的 "问题 "联系在一起,而德勒兹和瓜塔里坚持认为,制度实践仍然受制于 "不确定的 "但又是集体的革命身份的展开,从而使问题变得更加复杂。我认为,他们的理论对当代政治思想最重要的方面在于,他们论证了在不引入以主体的一般概念为基础的制度的情况下,将不同形式的政治实验联合起来的必要性,并在最后讨论了他们对克服 "交流的cogito"--一种对当代资本主义民主至关重要的话语性 "一般主体"--的重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信