Development and adaptation of the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) for the Australian osteopathic profession - A cognitive interview study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Oliver P. Thomson , Gopi Anne McLeod , Michael Fleischmann , Brett Vaughan
{"title":"Development and adaptation of the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) for the Australian osteopathic profession - A cognitive interview study","authors":"Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;Gopi Anne McLeod ,&nbsp;Michael Fleischmann ,&nbsp;Brett Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel 36-item instrument developed from qualitative grounded theory research with osteopaths in the United Kingdom. The Osteo-TAQ has the potential to measure multiple domains of osteopaths' practice including their therapeutic approach, clinical decision-making and therapeutic relationship with patients. It is unknown how well the items in the Osteo-TAQ relate to the practice of Australian osteopaths.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess and improve the quality of the Osteo-TAQ survey items prior to utilising the Osteo-TAQ amongst the Australian osteopathic profession.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cognitive interviews with six Australian registered osteopaths (n = 6) were used to generate data on how participants interpreted and understood the Osteo-TAQ items. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was used to identify issues of comprehension and problem areas relating to the Osteo-TAQ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three areas for improvement were identified in relation to the core aspects of clinical practice (the patient, examination, treatment and management), use of possessive pronouns and Likert scale frequency response options.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These problems may reflect the similarities in osteopathic practice in the UK and Australia, but also indicate subtle differences in the terminology utilised by osteopaths to describe and communicate areas of their clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel 36-item instrument developed from qualitative grounded theory research with osteopaths in the United Kingdom. The Osteo-TAQ has the potential to measure multiple domains of osteopaths' practice including their therapeutic approach, clinical decision-making and therapeutic relationship with patients. It is unknown how well the items in the Osteo-TAQ relate to the practice of Australian osteopaths.

Objectives

To assess and improve the quality of the Osteo-TAQ survey items prior to utilising the Osteo-TAQ amongst the Australian osteopathic profession.

Methods

Cognitive interviews with six Australian registered osteopaths (n = 6) were used to generate data on how participants interpreted and understood the Osteo-TAQ items. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was used to identify issues of comprehension and problem areas relating to the Osteo-TAQ.

Results

Three areas for improvement were identified in relation to the core aspects of clinical practice (the patient, examination, treatment and management), use of possessive pronouns and Likert scale frequency response options.

Conclusion

These problems may reflect the similarities in osteopathic practice in the UK and Australia, but also indicate subtle differences in the terminology utilised by osteopaths to describe and communicate areas of their clinical practice.

为澳大利亚整骨疗法专业开发和改编整骨疗法治疗方法问卷(Osteo-TAQ)--认知访谈研究
背景骨科医师治疗方法问卷(Osteo-TAQ)是根据对英国骨科医师进行的定性基础理论研究开发的 36 个项目的新工具。Osteo-TAQ 有可能测量骨科医生实践的多个领域,包括他们的治疗方法、临床决策以及与患者的治疗关系。在澳大利亚整骨疗法专业中使用 Osteo-TAQ 之前,对 Osteo-TAQ 调查项目的质量进行评估和改进。方法对六名澳大利亚注册整骨疗法医师(n = 6)进行认知访谈,以获得有关参与者如何解释和理解 Osteo-TAQ 项目的数据。结果在临床实践的核心方面(患者、检查、治疗和管理)、物主代词的使用和李克特量表频率响应选项方面发现了三个需要改进的领域。结论这些问题可能反映了英国和澳大利亚骨科实践的相似性,但也表明骨科医生在描述和交流临床实践领域时所使用的术语存在细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信